Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: preliminary experience and comparison to conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgery

BMC Surgery

Jinyan Han¹  Xiaopeng Yu¹  Yongsheng Chen¹  Yongnan Li¹  Shuodong Wu¹  Dianbo Yao¹ 

[1] Department of General Surgery, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China

关键词: Multi-incision laparoscopic surgery;    Minimally invasive surgery;    Distal pancreatectomy;    Single-incision laparoscopic surgery;   

Others  :  1090894
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2482-14-105

 received in 2014-05-22, accepted in 2014-11-28,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), which has been demonstrated to be safely applied on kinds of surgeries, may represent an improvement over conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgery. However, there are still few clinical experiences of SILS in pancreatic surgery until now. In this study, we will summarize our experience of transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (TUSI-LDP), and compare its related parameters with conventional multi-port laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (C-LDP).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted for the patients who underwent C-LDP or TUSI-LDP in our department. The demographic data, operative parameters, and postoperative complications in the two groups were summarized and compared.

Results

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy was performed in a total of 21 cases, among which TUSI-LDP was performed in 14 cases. As far as the demographical results concerned, there were no significant differences between the two groups. The conversion to open surgery was conducted in one case in the TUSI-LDP group because of severe adhesion between pancreatic cyst and surrounding tissues, while in the C-LDP group the only one conversion was for the difficult detection of small lesion. The mean operating time and intraoperative blood loss in TUSI-LDP group was a little shorter (166.4 ± 57.4 versus 202.1 ± 122.5 minutes, p > 0.05, and 157.1 ± 162.4 versus 168.6 ± 157.4 ml, p > 0.05). The postoperative pain and post-operation lengths of hospital stay in the TUSI-LDP group were also less, though there was no significant statistical difference between the two groups. For the post-operation complications, in TUSI-LDP group the pancreatic leakage occurred in only one case, and ceased spontaneously with only a drain for 61 days. There were no other complications including postoperative hemorrhage, venous thrombosis, infections and so on in both groups.

Conclusion

For the experienced laparoscopic surgeons, in selected patients, TUSI-LDP is a feasible technique, with excellent cosmetic effect, less postoperative pain and post-operation lengths of hospital stay. With the experience accumulated, the operating time and intraoperative blood loss of TUSI-LDP could also gradually reduce.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Yao et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Lee SY, Allen PJ, Sadot E, D'Angelica MI, DeMatteo RP, Fong Y, Jarnagin WR, Kingham TP: Distal Pancreatectomy: A Single Institution's Experience in Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Approaches. J Am Coll Surg 2014. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.10.004
• [2]Røsok BI, Marangos IP, Kazaryan AM, Rosseland AR, Buanes T, Mathisen O, Edwin B: Single-centre experience of laparoscopic pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg 2010, 97:902-909.
• [3]Kneuertz PJ, Patel SH, Chu CK, Fisher SB, Maithel SK, Sarmiento JM, Weber SM, Staley CA, Kooby DA: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: trends and lessons learned through an 11-year experience. J Am Coll Surg 2012, 215:167-176.
• [4]Tranchart H, Ketoff S, Lainas P, Pourcher G, Di Giuro G, Tzanis D, Ferretti S, Dautruche A, Devaquet N, Dagher I: Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: for what benefit? HPB (Oxford) 2013, 15:433-438.
• [5]Frutos MD, Abrisqueta J, Lujan J, Abellan I, Parrilla P: Randomized prospective study to compare laparoscopic appendectomy versus umbilical single-incision appendectomy. Ann Surg 2013, 257:413-418.
• [6]Barbaros U, Sümer A, Demirel T, Karakullukçu N, Batman B, Içscan Y, Sarıçam G, Serin K, Loh WL, Dinççağ A, Mercan S: Single incision laparoscopic pancreas resection for pancreatic metastasis of renal cell carcinoma. JSLS 2010, 14:566-570.
• [7]Kuroki T, Adachi T, Okamoto T, Kanematsu T: Single-incision laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 2011, 58:1022-1024.
• [8]Chang SK, Lomanto D, Mayasari M: Single-port laparoscopic spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy. Minim Invasive Surg 2012, 2012:197429.
• [9]Misawa T, Ito R, Futagawa Y, Fujiwara Y, Kitamura H, Tsutsui N, Shiba H, Wakiyama S, Ishida Y, Yanaga K: Single-incision laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with or without splenic preservation: how we do it. Asian J Endosc Surg 2012, 5:195-199.
• [10]Srikanth G, Shetty N, Dubey D: Single incision laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy for neuroendocrine tumor of the tail of pancreas. J Minim Access Surg 2013, 9:132-135.
• [11]Yao D, Wu S, Tian Y, Fan Y, Kong J, Li Y: Transumbilical Single-Incision Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy: Primary Experience and Review of the English Literature. World J Surg 2013, 38:1196-1204.
• [12]Haugvik SP, Røsok BI, Waage A, Mathisen O, Edwin B: Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a single-institution case–control study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2013, 398:1091-1096.
• [13]Machado MA, Surjan RC, Makdissi FF: First single-port laparoscopic pancreatectomy in Brazil. Arq Gastroenterol 2013, 50:310-312.
• [14]Hong TH, Kim HL, Lee YS, Kim JJ, Lee KH, You YK, Oh SJ, Park SM: Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (TUSPLA): scarless intracorporeal appendectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2009, 19:75-78.
• [15]Filipovic-Cugura J, Kirac I, Kulis T, Jankovic J, Bekavac-Beslin M: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: first case. Surg Endosc 2009, 4:920-921.
• [16]Reavis KM, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, Nguyen NT: Single-laparoscopic incision transabdominal surgery sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 2008, 11:1492-1494.
• [17]Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P: Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis for gastrojejunostomy: case report. Surg Endosc 2009, 7:1667-1670.
• [18]Barbaros U, Dinc¸c¸ag˘ A: Single incision laparoscopic splenectomy: the first two cases. J Gastrointest Surg 2009, 13:1520-1523.
• [19]Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Cadeddu JA: Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence. Eur Urol 2008, 5:1198-1204.
• [20]Zhao G, Hu M, Liu R, Xu D, Ouyang C, Xu Y, Jiao H, Wang B, Gu X: Laparoendoscopic single-site liver resection: a preliminary report of 12 cases. Surg Endosc 2011, 25:3286-3293.
• [21]Vidal O, Valentini M, Ginest’a C, Martí J, Espert JJ, Benarroch G, García-Valdecasas JC: Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery appendectomy. Surg Endosc 2010, 24:686-691.
• [22]Lee J, Baek J, Kim W: Laparoscopic transumbilical single-port appendectomy: initial experience and comparison with three-port appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Technol 2010, 20:100-103.
• [23]St Peter SD, Adibe OO, Juang D, Sharp SW, Garey CL, Laituri CA, Murphy JP, Andrews WS, Sharp RJ, Snyder CL, Holcomb GW 3rd, Ostlie DJ: Single incision versus standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 2011, 254:586-590.
• [24]Papaconstantinou HT, Thomas JS: Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: assessment of oncologic resection and short-term outcomes in a case-matched comparison with standard laparoscopy. Surgery 2011, 150:820-827.
• [25]Kong J, Wu SD, Su Y, Fan Y: Single incision versus conventional laparoscopic resection in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a retrospective cohort analysis at a single tertiary care center. Onco Targets Ther 2014, 7:995-999.
• [26]Ahmed K, Wang TT, Patel VM, Nagpal K, Clark J, Ali M, Deeba S, Ashrafian H, Darzi A, Athanasiou T, Paraskeva P: The role of single-incision laparoscopic surgery in abdominal and pelvic surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2011, 25:378-396.
• [27]Raakow R, Jacob DA: Initial experience in laparoscopic single-port appendectomy: a pilot study. Dig Surg 2011, 28:74-79.
• [28]Teoh AY, Chiu PW, Wong TC, Wong SK, Lai PB, Ng EK: A case-controlled comparison of singlesite access versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc 2011, 25:1415-1419.
• [29]Kooby DA, Gillespie T, Bentrem D, Nakeeb A, Schmidt MC, Merchant NB, Parikh AA, Martin RC 2nd, Scoggins CR, Ahmad S, Kim HJ, Park J, Johnston F, Strouch MJ, Menze A, Rymer J, McClaine R, Strasberg SM, Talamonti MS, Staley CA, McMasters KM, Lowy AM, Byrd-Sellers J, Wood WC, Hawkins WG: Left-sided pancreatectomy: a multicenter comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches. Ann Surg 2008, 248:438-446.
• [30]Cho CS, Kooby DA, Schmidt CM, Nakeeb A, Bentrem DJ, Merchant NB, Parikh AA, Martin RC 2nd, Scoggins CR, Ahmad SA, Kim HJ, Hamilton N, Hawkins WG, Weber SM: Laparoscopic versus open left pancreatectomy: can preoperative factors indicate the safer technique? Ann Surg 2011, 253:975-980.
• [31]Elola-Olaso AM, Allen A, Gagliardi RJ: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for solid and cystic pancreatic neoplasms: outpatient postoperative management. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2009, 19:470-473.
• [32]Tsai AY, Selzer DJ: Single-port laparoscopic surgery. Adv Surg 2010, 44:1-27.