Impact of sputum gross appearance and volume on smear positivity of pulmonary tuberculosis: a prospective cohort study

BMC Infectious Diseases

Jae Joon Yim¹  Nyoung Keun Lee²  Soon Ho Yoon² 

[1] Seoul National University College of Medicine, Chongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, South Korea;Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28, Yongon-dong, Chongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, South Korea

关键词: Tuberculosis;    Sputum;    Smear microscopy;   

Others  :  1175319
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2334-12-172

 received in 2012-03-08, accepted in 2012-06-13,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Although checking specimen quality upon sputum collection for acid-fast smear of suspected tuberculosis (TB) cases is recommended, this procedure is based on expert opinion. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the impact of sputum gross appearance and volume on smear positivity among patients with suspected pulmonary TB, according to sex.

Methods

From November 2010 through June 2011, we enrolled consecutive patients suspected to have active pulmonary TB. The association of sputum gross appearance and volume with smear positivity, along with other variables possibly affecting smear positivity such as symptoms, disease extent, and cavity on chest radiograph, were investigated.

Results

Among 2,439 patients undergoing TB examination, 170 (113 men, 57 women) with active pulmonary TB were enrolled. They submitted 492 sputa. There were 73 smear-positive patients (42.9%) and 164 smear-positive sputa (33.3%). While gross appearance was associated with smear positivity in both sexes (purulent or blood-tinged sputum (rather than mucoid sputum or saliva); odds ratio (OR), 2.05, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.21–3.47 in men; OR, 2.78, 95% CI, 1.23–6.26 in women), the amount of sputum specimens was associated with smear positivity in only female patients (≥4 ml versus <4 ml; OR, 4.96, 95% CI, 1.98–12.37).

Conclusions

Sputum gross appearance and volume were associated with smear positivity. A volume of 4 ml seems to be the the minimum sputum volume acceptable for smear microscopy in females suspected of TB. Those suspected of TB should be encouraged to expectorate grossly qualified sputum specimens.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Yoon et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Global tuberculosis control WHO report 2011.
• [2]WHO: Quality Assurance of Sputum Microscopy in DOTS Programmes: Regional Guidelines for Countries in the Western Pacific. http://www.wpro.who.int/NR/rdonlyres/769B76D6-270F-4438-A4BE-D6B9FAC3902E/0/Quality_assurance_for_sputum_WP.pdf webcite
• [3]Alisjahbana B, van Crevel R, Danusantoso H, Gartinah T, Soemantri ES, Nelwan RH, van der Meer JW: Better patient instruction for sputum sampling can improve microscopic tuberculosis diagnosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2005, 9(7):814-817.
• [4]Khan MS, Dar O, Sismanidis C, Shah K, Godfrey-Faussett P: Improvement of tuberculosis case detection and reduction of discrepancies between men and women by simple sputum-submission instructions: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2007, 369(9577):1955-1960.
• [5]Warren JR, Bhattacharya M, De Almeida KN, Trakas K, Peterson LR: A minimum 5.0 ml of sputum improves the sensitivity of acid-fast smear for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000, 161(5):1559-1562.
• [6]Hirooka T, Higuchi T, Tanaka N, Ogura T: The value of proper sputum collection instruction in detection of acid-fast bacillus. Kekkaku 2004, 79(2):33-37.
• [7]Macq J, Solis A, Velazquez H, Dujardin B: Informing the TB suspect for sputum sample collection and communicating laboratory results in Nicaragua: a neglected process in tuberculosis case finding. Salud Publica Mex 2005, 47(4):303-307.
• [8]Sakundarno M, Nurjazuli N, Jati SP, Sariningdyah R, Purwadi S, Alisjahbana B, van der Werf MJ: Insufficient quality of sputum submitted for tuberculosis diagnosis and associated factors, in Klaten district. Indonesia. BMC Pulm Med 2009, 9:16. BioMed Central Full Text
• [9]WHO Same-day diagnosis of tuberculosis by microscopy http://www.tbevidence.org/policies.htm webcite
• [10]Cuevas LE, Yassin MA, Al-Sonboli N, Lawson L, Arbide I, Al-Aghbari N, Sherchand JB, Al-Absi A, Emenyonu EN, Merid Y, et al.: A multi-country non-inferiority cluster randomized trial of frontloaded smear microscopy for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. PLoS Med 2011, 8(7):e1000443.
• [11]Mase SR, Ramsay A, Ng V, Henry M, Hopewell PC, Cunningham J, Urbanczik R, Perkins MD, Aziz MA, Pai M: Yield of serial sputum specimen examinations in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2007, 11(5):485-495.
• [12]South-East Asia Regional Office: WHO. http://www.searo.who.int/en/Section10/Section17/Section53/Section482_1799.htm webcite
• [13]California Department of Public Health/California Tuberculosis Controllers Association Joint Guidelines: Guidelines for the Assessment of Tuberculosis Patient Infectiousness and Placement into High and Lower Risk Settings http://www.ctca.org/guidelines/ctca_infectiousness_guidelines.doc webcite
• [14]Khan MS, Dar O, Tahseen S, Godfrey-Faussett P: Judging respiratory specimen acceptability for AFB microscopy: visual vs. microscopic screening. Trop Med Int Health 2009, 14(5):571-575.
• [15]Metchock BG, Nolte FS, Wallace RJ: Mycobacterium. In Manual of Clinical Microbiology. 7th edition. Edited by Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfaller MA, Tenover FC, Yokken RH. Washington: ASM Press; 1999:399-437.
• [16]Falk A, O'Connor JB, Pratt PC: Classification of pulmonary tuberculosis. In Diagnostic standards and classification of tuberculosis. 12, vol. 6th edition. New York: National Tuberculosis and Respiratory Disease Association; 1969:68-76.
• [17]Ramsay A, Bonnet M, Gagnidze L, Githui W, Varaine F, Guerin PJ: Sputum, sex and scanty smears: new case definition may reduce sex disparities in smear-positive tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2009, 13(5):613-619.
• [18]Landis JR, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977, 33(1):159-174.
• [19]Bonnet M, Ramsay A, Githui W, Gagnidze L, Varaine F, Guerin PJ: Bleach sedimentation: an opportunity to optimize smear microscopy for tuberculosis diagnosis in settings of high prevalence of HIV. Clin Infect Dis 2008, 46(11):1710-1716.
• [20]Curione CJ, Kaneko GS, Voss JL, Hesse F, Smith RF: Gram stain evaluation of the quality of sputum specimens for mycobacterial culture. J Clin Microbiol 1977, 5(3):381-382.
• [21]Isaac-Renton JL, Puselja BB, Allen EA, Grzybowski S, Black WA: Microscopic evaluation of sputum specimens submitted for Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture. Am J Clin Pathol 1985, 84(3):361-363.
• [22]Murray P, Baron EJ, Jorgenson JH, et al.: Manual of Clinical Microbiology. 9th edition. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2007:1-319.
• [23]Uplekar MRS, Ogden J: Gender and tuberculosis control: towards a strategy for research and action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.
• [24]Alisjahbana B, van Crevel R: Improved diagnosis of tuberculosis by better sputum quality. Lancet 2007, 369(9577):1908-1909.
• [25]Department of Health: Tuberculosis - Sputum Induction Guidelines. http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/policies/gl/2009/GL2009_006.html webcite
• [26]Kivihya-Ndugga LE, van Cleeff MR, Ng'ang'a LW, Meme H, Odhiambo JA, Klatser PR: Sex-specific performance of routine TB diagnostic tests. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2005, 9(3):294-300.
• [27]Tessema TA, Bjune G, Assefa G, Bjorvat B: An evaluation of the diagnostic value of clinical and radiological manifestations in patients attending the addis ababa tuberculosis centre. Scand J Infect Dis 2001, 33(5):355-361.
• [28]El-Sony A, Enarson D, Khamis A, Baraka O, Bjune G: Relation of grading of sputum smears with clinical features of tuberculosis patients in routine practice in Sudan. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2002, 6(2):91-97.
• [29]Palaci M, Dietze R, Hadad DJ, Ribeiro FK, Peres RL, Vinhas SA, Maciel EL, Dettoni V, Horter L, Boom WH, et al.: Cavitary disease and quantitative sputum bacillary load in cases of pulmonary tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 2007, 45(12):4064-4066.