Variations in levels of care between nursing home patients in a public health care system

BMC Health Services Research

Jon Magnussen³  Jorid Kalseth¹  Helge Garåsen²  Øystein Døhl² 

[1] SINTEF Health research, SINTEF Technology and Society, Trondheim, Norway;Department of Health and Welfare Services, City of Trondheim, Trondheim, Norway;Department of Public Health and General Practice, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 8905 MTFS, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway

关键词: Multi level analysis;    Cognitive impairment;    IADL;    ADL;    Care level;    Nursing home;   

Others  :  1133921
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6963-14-108

 received in 2013-09-27, accepted in 2014-02-21,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Within the setting of a public health service we analyse the distribution of resources between individuals in nursing homes funded by global budgets. Three questions are pursued. Firstly, whether there are systematic variations between nursing homes in the level of care given to patients. Secondly, whether such variations can be explained by nursing home characteristics. And thirdly, how individual need-related variables are associated with differences in the level of care given.

Methods

The study included 1204 residents in 35 nursing homes and extra care sheltered housing facilities. Direct time spent with patients was recorded. In average each patient received 14.8 hours direct care each week. Multilevel regression analysis is used to analyse the relationship between individual characteristics, nursing home characteristics and time spent with patients in nursing homes. The study setting is the city of Trondheim, with a population of approximately 180 000.

Results

There are large variations between nursing homes in the total amount of individual care given to patients. As much as 24 percent of the variation of individual care between patients could be explained by variation between nursing homes. Adjusting for structural nursing home characteristics did not substantially reduce the variation between nursing homes. As expected a negative association was found between individual care and case-mix, implying that at nursing home level a more resource demanding case-mix is compensated by lowering the average amount of care. At individual level ADL-disability is the strongest predictor for use of resources in nursing homes. For the average user one point increase in ADL-disability increases the use of resources with 27 percent.

Conclusion

In a financial reimbursement model for nursing homes with no adjustment for case-mix, the amount of care patients receive does not solely depend on the patients’ own needs, but also on the needs of all the other residents.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Døhl et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]OECD: Projecting OECD Health and Long-Term Care Expenditures: What are the main drivers? Volume 477. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2006.
• [2]Colombo F, Llena-Nozal A, Mercier J, Tjadens F: Help Wanted? Providing and Paying for Long-Term Care. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2011.
• [3]Gaugler JE, Duval S, Anderson KA, Kane RL: Predicting nursing home admission in the U.S: a meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr 2007, 7:13. BioMed Central Full Text
• [4]Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW: Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 1963, 185:914-919.
• [5]Fillenbaum GG: Screening the elderly. A brief instrumental activities of daily living measure. J Am Geriatr Soc 1985, 33(10):698-706.
• [6]Mahoney FI, Barthel DW: Functional Evaluation: The Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965, 14:61-65.
• [7]Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975, 12(3):189-198.
• [8]Fries BE, Schneider DP, Foley WJ, Gavazzi M, Burke R, Cornelius E: Refining a case-mix measure for nursing homes: Resource Utilization Groups (RUG-III). Med Care 1994, 32(7):668-685.
• [9]Björkgren M: RUG-III-baserade ersättningssystem för äldrevården. In Rapporter och artiklar, Volume 45. Karleby: Chydenius institutet - Karleby universitetscenter; 2004.
• [10]StatBank Kostra https://www.ssb.no/statistikkbanken/selecttable/hovedtabellHjem.asp?KortNavnWeb=pleie&CMSSubjectArea=helse&PLanguage=1&checked=true webcite
• [11]Christensen EW: Scale and scope economies in nursing homes: A quantile regression approach. Health Econ 2004, 13(4):363-377.
• [12]Farsi M, Filippini M, Lunati D: Economies of scale and efficiency measurement in Switzerland’s Nursing homes. Schweiz Z Volkswirtsch Stat 2008, 144(3):359.
• [13]Bostick JE, Rantz MJ, Flesner MK, Riggs CJ: Systematic review of studies of staffing and quality in nursing homes. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2006, 7(6):366-376.
• [14]Norwegian Directorate of health and social affairs: Felles forståelse-individuell registrering; Veileder. 2003., 1.0
• [15]Hebert R, Carrier R, Bilodeau A: The Functional Autonomy Measurement System (SMAF): description and validation of an instrument for the measurement of handicaps. Age Ageing 1988, 17(5):293-302.
• [16]Osborne JW, Costello AB, Kellow TJ: Best practices in exploratory factor analysis. In Best practices in quantitative methods. Edited by Osborne JW. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications; 2008.
• [17]Kennedy PE: Estimation with Correctly Interpreted Dummy Variables in Semilogarithmic Equations. Am Econ Rev 1981, 71(4):801.
• [18]Jan van Garderen K, Shah C: Exact interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. Econ J 2002, 5(1):149-159.
• [19]Arling G, Kane RL, Mueller C, Lewis T: Explaining direct care resource use of nursing home residents: findings from time studies in four states. Health Serv Res 2007, 42(2):827-846.
• [20]Tousignant M, Hebert R, Dubuc N, Simoneau F, Dieleman L: Application of a case-mix classification based on the functional autonomy of the residents for funding long-term care facilities. Age Ageing 2003, 32(1):60-66.
• [21]Farsi M, Filippini M: An Empirical Analysis of Cost Efficiency in Non-profit and Public Nursing Homes. Ann Pub Cooperative Econ 2004, 75(3):339-365.
• [22]Bjorkgren MA, Hakkinen U, Finne-Soveri UH, Fries BE: Validity and reliability of Resource Utilization Groups (RUG-III) in Finnish long-term care facilities. Scand J Pub Health 1999, 27(3):228-234.
• [23]Brizioli E, Bernabei R, Grechi F, Masera F, Landi F, Bandinelli S, Cavazzini C, Gangemi S, Ferrucci L: Nursing home case-mix instruments: validation of the RUG-III system in Italy. Aging Clin Exp Res 2003, 15(3):243-253.
• [24]Carpenter I, Perry M, Challis D, Hope K: Identification of registered nursing care of residents in English nursing homes using the Minimum Data Set Resident Assessment Instrument (MDS/RAI) and Resource Utilisation Groups version III (RUG-III). Age Ageing 2003, 32(3):279-285.
• [25]Nordberg G, Wimo A, Jonsson L, Kareholt I, Sjolund BM, Lagergren M, von Strauss E: Time use and costs of institutionalised elderly persons with or without dementia: results from the Nordanstig cohort in the Kungsholmen Project–a population based study in Sweden. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2007, 22(7):639-648.
• [26]Arling G, Williams AR: Cognitive impairment and resource use of nursing home residents: a structural equation model. Med Care 2003, 41(7):802-812.
• [27]Luttenberger K, Graessel E: Recording care time in nursing homes: development and validation of the “RUD-FOCA”(Resource Utilization in Dementia–Formal Care). Int Psychogeriatr 2010, 22(8):1291.
• [28]Banaszak-Holl J, Fendrick AM, Foster NL, Herzog AR, Kabeto MU, Kent DM, Straus WL, Langa KM: Predicting nursing home admission: estimates from a 7-year follow-up of a nationally representative sample of older Americans. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2004, 18(2):83-89.
• [29]Kalseth J: Politics and resource use in local government service production. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology; 2003.