Fixation using alternative implants for the treatment of hip fractures (FAITH): design and rationale for a multi-centre randomized trial comparing sliding hip screws and cancellous screws on revision surgery rates and quality of life in the treatment of femoral neck fractures

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

The FAITH Investigators¹ 

[1] Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, 293 Wellington Street North, Suite 110, L8L 8E7 Hamilton, ON, Canada

关键词: Sliding hip screw;    Cancellous screws;    Internal fixation;    Fracture fixation;    Femoral neck fractures;    Hip fractures;   

Others  :  1125508
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2474-15-219

 received in 2014-05-21, accepted in 2014-06-18,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Hip fractures are a common type of fragility fracture that afflict 293,000 Americans (over 5,000 per week) and 35,000 Canadians (over 670 per week) annually. Despite the large population impact the optimal fixation technique for low energy femoral neck fractures remains controversial. The primary objective of the FAITH study is to assess the impact of cancellous screw fixation versus sliding hip screws on rates of revision surgery at 24 months in individuals with femoral neck fractures. The secondary objective is to determine the impact on health-related quality of life, functional outcomes, health state utilities, fracture healing, mortality and fracture-related adverse events.

Methods/Design

FAITH is a multi-centre, multi-national randomized controlled trial utilizing minimization to determine patient allocation. Surgeons in North America, Europe, Australia, and Asia will recruit a total of at least 1,000 patients with low-energy femoral neck fractures. Using central randomization, patients will be allocated to receive surgical treatment with cancellous screws or a sliding hip screw. Patient outcomes will be assessed at one week (baseline), 10 weeks, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post initial fixation. We will independently adjudicate revision surgery and complications within 24 months of the initial fixation. Outcome analysis will be performed using a Cox proportional hazards model and likelihood ratio test.

Discussion

This study represents major international efforts to definitively resolve the treatment of low-energy femoral neck fractures. This trial will not only change current Orthopaedic practice, but will also set a benchmark for the conduct of future Orthopaedic trials.

Trial registration

The FAITH trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT00761813).

【 授权许可】

   
2014 The FAITH Investigators; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Leslie WD, O’Donnell S, Jean S, Lagacé C, Walsh P, Bancej C, Morin S, Hanley DA, Papaioannou A, Osteoporosis Surveillance Expert Working Group: Trends in hip fracture rates in Canada. JAMA 2009, 302:883-889.
• [2]Stevens JA, Rudd RA: Declining hip fracture rates in the United States. Age Ageing 2010, 39:500-503.
• [3]Johnell O, Kanis JA: An estimate of the worldwide prevalence, mortality and disability associated with hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 2004, 15:897-902.
• [4]Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ 3rd: Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int 1992, 2:285-289.
• [5]Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A: Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res 2007, 22:465-475.
• [6]Tarride JE, Hopkins R, Leslie WD, Morin S, Papaioannou A, Adachi R, Bischof M, Goeree R: The Acute Care Costs of Osteoporosis-Related Fractures in Canada. In Proceedings of the ISPOR 13th Annual European Congress: 6–9 November 2010. Prague, Czech Republic: International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research; 2010.
• [7]Papadimitropoulos EA, Coyte PC, Josse RG, Greenwood CE: Current and projected rates of hip fracture in Canada. CMAJ 1997, 157:1357-1363.
• [8]Moran CG, Wenn RT, Sikand M, Taylor AM: Early mortality after hip fracture: is delay before surgery important? J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87:483-489.
• [9]Jongjit J, Komsopapong L, Songjakkaew P, Kongsakon R: Health-related quality of life after hip fracture in the elderly community-dwelling. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2003, 34:670-674.
• [10]Wilkins K: Health care consequences of falls for seniors. Health Rep 1999, 10:47-55.
• [11]Laursen JO: Treatment of intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck in Denmark: trends over the past decade. Acta Orthop Belg 1999, 65:478-484.
• [12]Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Tornetta P 3rd, Swiontkowski MF, Berry DJ, Haidukewych G, Schemitsch EH, Hanson BP, Koval K, Dirschl D, Leece P, Keel M, Petrisor B, Heetveld M, Guyatt GH: Operative management of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. An international survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87:2122-2130.
• [13]Leonardsson O, Sernbo I, Carlsson A, Akesson K, Rogmark C: Long-term follow-up of replacement compared with internal fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures: results at ten years in a randomised study of 450 patients. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2010, 92:406-412.
• [14]Chua D, Jagai SB, Schatzker J: An orthopedic surgeon survey on the treatment of displaced femoral neck fracture: opposing views. Can J Surg 1997, 40:271-277.
• [15]Masson M, Parker MJ, Fleischer S: Internal fixation versus arthroplasty for intracapsular proximal femoral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002, i-84.
• [16]Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Swiontkowski M, Tornetta P, Obremskey W, Koval K, Nork S, Sprague S, Schemitsch E, Guyatt G: Internal fixation compared with arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femoral neck. J Bone Joint Surg 2003, 85A:1673-1681.
• [17]Elmerson S, Sjostedt A, Zetterberg C: Fixation of femoral neck fracture. A randomized 2-year follow-up study of hook pins and sliding screw plate in 222 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 1995, 66:507-510.
• [18]Johansson A, Stromqvist B, Bauer G, Hansson LI, Pettersson H: Improved operations for femoral neck fracture. A radiographic evaluation. Acta Orthop Scand 1986, 57:505-509.
• [19]Lindequist S: Cortical screw support in femoral neck fractures. A radiographic analysis of 87 fractures with a new mensuration technique. Acta Orthop Scand 1993, 64:289-293.
• [20]Swiontkowski MF, Harrington RM, Keller TS, Van Patten PK: Torsion and bending analysis of internal fixation techniques for femoral neck fractures: the role of implant design and bone density. J Orthop Res 1987, 5:433-444.
• [21]Linke B, Schwieger K, Bursic D, Dutoit C, Ulrich D, Gautier E: Treatment of Unstable Femoral Neck Fractures: Is the Dynamic hip Screw a Superior Alternative to 3 Cannulated Screws? In Presented at OTA Annual Meeting (Poster 55): 8–10 October 2004. Hollywood: Orthopaedic Trauma Association; 2004:80-81.
• [22]Madsen F, Linde F, Andersen E, Birke H, Hvass I, Poulsen TD: Fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures. A comparison between sliding screw plate and four cancellous bone screws. Acta Orthop Scand 1987, 58:212-216.
• [23]Jones HW, Johnston P, Parker M: Are short femoral nails superior to the sliding hip screw? A meta-analysis of 24 studies involving 3,279 fractures. Int Orthop 2006, 30:69-78.
• [24]Alobaid A, Harvey EJ, Elder GM, Lander P, Guy P, Reindl R: Minimally invasive dynamic hip screw: prospective randomized trial of two techniques of insertion of a standard dynamic fixation device. J Orthop Trauma 2004, 18:207-212.
• [25]Parker MJ, Gurusamy KS: Internal fixation implants for intracapsular proximal femoral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001, i-73.
• [26]Pandis N: Randomization. Part 2: minimization. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011, 140:902-904.
• [27]Gillespie WJ: Extracts for “clinical evidence”: hip fracture. BMJ 2001, 322:968-975.
• [28]Dripps RD: New classification of physical status. Anesthesiol 1963, 24:111.
• [29]Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR: Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Centers for disease control and prevention (CDC) hospital infection control practices advisory committee. Am J Infect Control 1999, 27:97-132.
• [30]Davison JN, Calder SJ, Anderson GH, Ward G, Jagger C, Harper WM, Gregg PJ: Treatment for displaced intracapsular fracture of the proximal femur: a prospective, randomized trial in patients aged 65 to 79 years. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2001, 83:206-212.
• [31]Rogmark C, Carlsson A, Johnell O, Sernbo I: A prospective randomised trial of internal fixation versus arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the neck of the femur. Functional outcome for 450 patients at two years. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2002, 84:183-188.
• [32]McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Rogers W, Raczek AE, Lu JF: The validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts. Results from the medical outcomes study. Med Care 1992, 30:MS253-MS265.
• [33]Brooks R, Rabin R, De Charro F: The Measurement and Valuation of Health Status Using EQ-5D: A European Perspective. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2003.
• [34]Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW: Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988, 15:1833-1840.
• [35]Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD: A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996, 34:220-233.
• [36]Dattani R, Slobogean GP, O’Brien PJ, Broekhuyse HM, Blachut PA, Guy P, Lefaivre KA: Psychometric analysis of measuring functional outcomes in tibial plateau fractures using the Short Form 36 (SF-36), Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) and the Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) questionnaires. Injury 2013, 44:825-829.
• [37]Devereaux PJ, Bhandari M, Clarke M, Montori VM, Cook DJ, Yusuf S, Sackett DL, Cinà CS, Walter SD, Haynes B, Schünemann HJ, Norman GR, Guyatt GH: Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2005, 330:88.
• [38]Keating JF, Grant A, Masson M, Scott NW, Forbes JF: Displaced intracapsular hip fractures in fit, older people: a randomised comparison of reduction and fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty. Health Technol Assess 2005, 9:1-65.
• [39]Iversen BF, Aalberg JR, Naver LS: Complications of fractures of the femoral neck. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1986, 75:341-344.
• [40]Lu-Yao GL, Keller RB, Littenberg B, Wennberg JE: Outcomes after displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta analysis of 106 published reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994, 76:15-25.
• [41]Puolakka TJ, Laine HJ, Tarvainen T, Aho H: Thompson hemiarthroplasty is superior to Ullevaal screws in treating displaced femoral neck fractures in patients over 75 years. A prospective randomized study with two-year follow-up. Ann Chir Gynaecol 2001, 90:225-228.
• [42]Kuokkanen H, Korkala O, Antti-Poika I, Tolonen J, Lehtimäki MY, Silvennoinen T: Three cancellous bone screws versus a screw-angle plate in the treatment of Garden I and II fractures of the femoral neck. Acta Orthop Belg 1991, 57:53-57.
• [43]Harper WM, Gregg PJ: The treatment of intracapsular proximal femoral fractures: a randomized prospective trial (abstract). J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1992, 74(111 Suppl):282S.
• [44]Sørensen JL, Varmarken JE, Bømler J: Internal fixation of femoral neck fractures. Dynamic Hip and Gouffon screws compared in 73 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 1992, 63:288-292.
• [45]Paus A, Gjengedal E, Hareide A, Jørgensen JJ: Dislocated fractures of the femoral neck treated with von Bahr screws or hip compression screw. Results of a prospective, randomized study. J Oslo City Hosp 1986, 36(5–6):55-61.
• [46]Collett D: Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research. London, UK: Chapman and Hall; 1994.
• [47]Rogmark C, Johnell O: Primary arthroplasty is better than internal fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures: a meta-analysis of 14 randomized studies with 2,289 patients. Acta Orthop 2006, 77(3):359-367.
• [48]Sernbo I, Fredin H: Changing methods of hip fracture osteosynthesis in Sweden. An epidemiological enquiry covering 46,900 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 1993, 64:173-174.
• [49]Wu CC, Chen WJ: Minimally displaced intra-capsular femoral neck fractures in the elderly – comparison of multiple threaded pins and sliding hip compression screws surgical techniques. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2003, 11:129-136.
• [50]Bhandari M, Guyatt G, Tornetta P III, Schemitsch EH, Swiontkowski M, Sanders D, Walter SD, SPRINT Investigators: Randomized trial of reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90:2567-2578.
• [51]Bhandari M, Guyatt G, Tornetta P III, Schemitsch E, Swiontkowski M, Sanders D, Walter SD, SPRINT Investigators: Study to prospectively evaluate reamed intramedually nails in patients with tibial fractures (S.P.R.I.N.T.): study rationale and design. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008, 9:91.
• [52]Devereaux PJ, Yang H, Guyatt GH, Leslie K, Villar JC, Monteri VM, Choi P, Giles JW, Yusuf S, POISE Trial Investigators: Rationale, design, and organization of the PeriOperative ISchemic Evaluation (POISE) trial: a randomized controlled trial of metoprolol versus placebo in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Am Heart J 2006, 152:223-230.
• [53]Cook D, Meade M, Guyatt G, Walter S, Heels-Ansdell D, Warkentin TE, Zytaruk N, Crowther M, Geerts W, Cooper DJ, Vallance S, Qushmaq I, Rocha M, Berwanger O, Vlahakis NE, PROTECT Investigators for the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group: Dalteparin versus unfractionated heparin in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 2011, 364:1305-1314.