Stakeholders’ perceptions of transferability criteria for health promotion interventions: a case study

BMC Public Health

François Alla²  Linda Cambon¹  Laetitia Minary³  Joëlle Kivits²  Justine Trompette² 

[1] EA 4360 Apemac, Faculté de médecine, Université de Lorraine, 54250 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France;Université de Lorraine, Faculté de Médecine, Ecole de Santé Publique, 9 avenue de la Forêt de Haye – BP 184, 54505 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France;Inserm, CIC-EC, Centre hospitalier universitaire, 54000 Nancy, France

关键词: Evidence-based health promotion;    Implementation;    Intervention;    Health promotion;    Transferability;   

Others  :  1123067
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-14-1134

 received in 2013-06-05, accepted in 2014-10-17,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

The effects of health promotion interventions are the result not only of the interventions themselves, but also of the contexts in which they unfold. The objective of this study was to analyze, through stakeholders’ discourse, the characteristics of an intervention that can influence its outcomes.

Methods

This case study was based on semi-structured interviews with health promotion stakeholders involved in a regional program (PRALIMAP). General hypotheses on transferability and on how the intervention is presumed to produce its effects were used to construct an interview guide. Interviews were analyzed using thematic coding.

Results

Twenty-three stakeholders were interviewed. Results showed stakeholders made few references to population and environment characteristics. Three themes emerged as significant for the stakeholders: implementation modalities and methodology, modalities used to mobilize actors; and transferability-promoting factors and barriers.

Conclusion

Our work contributes to a better understanding not only of transferability factors, but also of stakeholders’ perceptions of them, which are just as important, because those perceptions themselves are a factor in mobilization of actors, implementation, and transferability.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Trompette et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Victora CG, Habicht J-P, Bryce J: Evidence-based public health: moving beyond randomized trials. Am J Public Health 2004, 94:400-405.
• [2]Rychetnik L, Frommer M, Hawe P, Shiell A: Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002, 56:119-127.
• [3]Nutbeam D: Evaluating health promotion—progress, problems and solutions. Health Promot Int 1998, 13:27-44.
• [4]McQueen D, Anderson L: Données probantes et évaluation des programmes en promotion de la santé. Ruptures 2000, 7:79-98.
• [5]McQueen DV: Strengthening the evidence base for health promotion. Health Promot Int 2001, 16:261-268.
• [6]McQueen D, Jones CM: Global Perspectives on Health Promotion Effectiveness. New York: Springer; 2007.
• [7]Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M: Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008, 337:a1655.
• [8]Campbell NC, Murray E, Darbyshire J, Emery J, Farmer A, Griffiths F, Guthrie B, Lester H, Wilson P, Kinmonth AL: Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care. BMJ 2007, 334:455-459.
• [9]Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T: Theorising interventions as events in systems. Am J Community Psychol 2009, 43:267-276.
• [10]Wang S, Moss JR, Hiller JE: Applicability and transferability of interventions in evidence-based public health. Health Promot Int 2006, 21:76-83.
• [11]Cambon L, Minary L, Ridde V, Alla F: Transferability of interventions in health education: a review. BMC Public Health 2012, 12:497. BioMed Central Full Text
• [12]Burford B, Lewin S, Welch V, Rehfuess E, Waters E: Assessing the applicability of findings in systematic reviews of complex interventions can enhance the utility of reviews for decision making. J Clin Epidemiol 2013, 66:1251-1261.
• [13]Dyrvig A-K, Kidholm K, Gerke O, Vondeling H: Checklists for external validity: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract 2014.
• [14]Green LW, Glasgow RE: Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: issues in external validation and translation methodology. Eval Health Prof 2006, 29:126-153.
• [15]Burchett H, Umoquit M, Dobrow M: How do we know when research from one setting can be useful in another? A review of external validity, applicability and transferability frameworks. J Health Serv Res Policy 2011, 16:238-244.
• [16]Stirman SW, Kimberly J, Cook N, Calloway A, Castro F, Charns M: The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research. Implement Sci 2012, 7:17. BioMed Central Full Text
• [17]Chaudoir SR, Dugan AG, Barr CHI: Measuring factors affecting implementation of health innovations: a systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient, and innovation level measures. Implement Sci IS 2013, 8:22. BioMed Central Full Text
• [18]Feldstein AC, Glasgow RE: A Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM). Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2008, 34:228-243.
• [19]Dzewaltowski DA, Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Estabrooks PA, Brock E: RE-AIM: evidence-based standards and a web resource to improve translation of research into practice. Ann Behav Med 2004, 28:75-80.
• [20]Buffett C, Ciliska D, Thomas H: Can I Use This Evidence in my Program Decision? Assessing Applicability and Transferability of Evidence. Hamilton, ON: National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools; 2007.
• [21]Laws RA, St George AB, Rychetnik L, Bauman AE: Diabetes prevention research: a systematic review of external validity in lifestyle interventions. Am J Prev Med 2012, 43:205-214.
• [22]Cambon L, Minary L, Ridde V, Alla F: A tool to analyze the transferability of health promotion interventions. BMC Public Health 2013, 13:1184. BioMed Central Full Text
• [23]Desgroseilliers V, Vonarx N: Retrouver la complexité du réel dans les approches théoriques de promotion de la santé : transiter par l’identité du sujet. Sante Publique 2014, 26:17-31.
• [24]Ridde V, Mak G: La place des données qualitatives dans les évaluations en santé publique. adsp 2009, 69:32-34.
• [25]Wertz FJ, Charmaz K, McMullen LM, Josselson R, Anderson R, McSpadden E: Five Ways of Doing Qualitative Analysis: Phenomenological Psychology, Grounded Theory, Discourse Analysis, Narrative Research, and Intuitive Inquiry. New York: Guilford Publications; 2011.
• [26]Flick U: An Introduction to Qualitative Research. 4th edition. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications; 2009.
• [27]Baxter P, Jack S: Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers. Qual Rep 2008, 13:544-559.
• [28]Bonsergent E, Agrinier N, Thilly N, Tessier S, Legrand K, Lecomte E, Aptel E, Hercberg S, Collin J-F, Briançon S: Overweight and obesity prevention for adolescents. Am J Prev Med 2013, 44:30-39.
• [29]Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldaña J: Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2013.
• [30]Programme national nutrition santé - 2011–2015 - Ministère des Affaires sociales et de la Santé - http://www.sante.gouv.fr webcite [http://www.sante.gouv.fr/programme-national-nutrition-sante-2011-2015.html webcite]
• [31]Hercberg S, Chat-Yung S, Chauliac M: The French National Nutrition and Health Program: 2001–2006–2010. Int J Public Health 2008, 53:68-77.
• [32]Kam C-M, Greenberg MT, Walls CT: Examining the role of implementation quality in school-based prevention using the PATHS curriculum. Promoting Alternative THinking Skills Curriculum. Prev Sci Off J Soc Prev Res 2003, 4:55-63.
• [33]Tzenalis A, Sotiriadou C: Health promotion as multi-professional and multi-disciplinary work. Int J Caring Sci 2010, 3:49-55.
• [34]Saunders RP, Evans AE, Kenison K, Workman L, Dowda M, Chu YH: Conceptualizing, implementing, and monitoring a structural health promotion intervention in an organizational setting. Health Promot Pract 2013, 14:343-353.
• [35]Potvin L, Bilodeau A, Gendron S: Trois défis pour l’évaluation en promotion de la santé. Promot Educ 2008, 15(1 suppl):17-21.
• [36]Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC: Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci IS 2009, 4:50. BioMed Central Full Text
• [37]Poland B, Krupa G, McCall D: Settings for health promotion: an analytic framework to guide intervention design and implementation. Health Promot Pract 2009, 10:505-516.
• [38]Flottorp SA, Oxman AD, Krause J, Musila NR, Wensing M, Godycki-Cwirko M, Baker R, Eccles MP: A checklist for identifying determinants of practice: a systematic review and synthesis of frameworks and taxonomies of factors that prevent or enable improvements in healthcare professional practice. Implement Sci IS 2013, 8:35. BioMed Central Full Text
• [39]Gagliardi AR, Brouwers MC: Integrating guideline development and implementation: analysis of guideline development manual instructions for generating implementation advice. Implement Sci IS 2012, 7:67. BioMed Central Full Text
• [40]Cambon L, Alla F: [Transfer and sharing of public health knowledge: reflections on the components of a national information system in France]. Santé Publique Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy Fr 2013, 25:757-762.
• [41]Nutley S, Walter I, Davies HTO: Promoting evidence-based practice models and mechanisms from cross-sector review. Res Soc Work Pract 2009, 19:552-559.
• [42]Munerol L, Cambon L, Alla F: [Knowledge brokering: definition and application based on a review of the literature]. Santé Publique Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy Fr 2013, 25:587-597.
• [43]Ridde V, Dagenais C, Boileau M: An exploratory synthesis of knowledge brokering in public health. Sante Publique 2013, 25:137-145.
• [44]Pawson R, Tilley N: Realistic Evaluation. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 1997.