BMC Oral Health | |
Trends in tooth loss in relation to socio-economic status among Swedish women, aged 38 and 50 years: repeated cross-sectional surveys 1968-2004 | |
Magnus Hakeberg2  Cecilia Björkelund3  Ulrika Stenman2  Margareta Ahlqwist1  Anette Wennström2  | |
[1] Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden;Department of Behavioral and Community Dentistry, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 450, Gothenburg 405 30, Sweden;Department of Public Health and Community Medicine / Primary Health Care, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden | |
关键词: Number of teeth; Trends; Women; Socio-economic status; Oral health; Tooth loss; | |
Others : 1121550 DOI : 10.1186/1472-6831-13-63 |
|
received in 2013-04-30, accepted in 2013-10-31, 发布年份 2013 | |
【 摘 要 】
Background
Oral diseases are a health problem worldwide. Differences in oral health status may vary with geographical locations, but also within the same country and between groups with different social backgrounds. The specific aims were to describe secular trends in oral health status regarding number of remaining teeth and also to describe differences in socio-economic status, among 38- and 50-year-old women, over a 36-year period.
Methods
Cross-sectional health surveys were performed at four occasions; 1968/69 (n = 746), 1980/81 (n = 532), 1992/93 (n = 165) and 2004/05 (n = 500), including randomly selected women aged 38 and 50 years. The number of teeth was determined using panoramic radiographs and self-reported measures of marital status, social class, educational level, and income were recorded.
Results
The mean number of teeth among women has increased significantly. The educational level has increased while fewer women are married/cohabiting over time. There has been a shift in the social group the women belong to, where proportionally more women were categorized in a higher social group in 2004/05 than in 1968/69. Moreover, there is a significant relationship between fewer teeth and a lower social group, and among the 50-year-old women, this was irrespective of examination year. However, multivariate analyses showed that the risk to be edentulous or not, or to have fewer remaining teeth was significantly higher for women of lower social group, or living alone, in all studies over the 36 year-period. This was independent of age group, even though the risk diminished over the study period.
Conclusions
Cohort comparisons of women aged 38 and 50 years during 36 years showed that dental status improved, with (i) a decreasing prevalence of edentulism and, (ii) an increasing number of remaining teeth in dentate individuals over time. Differences due to social group and education were still present, with more remaining teeth in the women in the higher social group. A time trend analysis indicated that in the later examination years the individuals had fewer teeth lost, irrespective of age, marital status and, social group.
【 授权许可】
2013 Wennström et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
20150212024656517.pdf | 191KB | download |
【 参考文献 】
- [1]Petersen PE: The World Oral Health Report 2003: continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century–the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003, 31(Suppl 1):3-23.
- [2]Mackenbach JP, Kunst AE, Cavelaars AE, Groenhof F, Geurts JJ: Socioeconomic inequalities in morbidity and mortality in western Europe. The EU Working Group on Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health. Lancet 1997, 349(9066):1655-1659.
- [3]Cunha-Cruz J, Hujoel PP, Nadanovsky P: Secular trends in socio-economic disparities in edentulism: USA, 1972–2001. J Dent Res 2007, 86(2):131-136.
- [4]Smedby B: Betydelsen av vissa faktorer för tandvårdskonsumtionen: en metodologisk studie baserad på en intervjuundersökning. Stockholm; 1972:37. [Socialmedicinsk tidskrifts skriftserie] Volume 0346-6329
- [5]Holst D: Oral health equality during 30 years in Norway. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2008, 36(4):326-334.
- [6]Celeste RK, Nadanovsky P, Fritzell J: Trends in socioeconomic disparities in the utilization of dental care in Brazil and Sweden. Scand J Public Health 2011, 39(6):640-648.
- [7]Watt RG: From victim blaming to upstream action: tackling the social determinants of oral health inequalities. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2007, 35(1):1-11.
- [8]Holm A-K: Att förebygga karies [Elektronisk resurs]: en systematisk litteraturöversikt. Stockholm: SBU; 2002.
- [9]Hugoson A, Koch G, Gothberg C, Helkimo AN, Lundin SA, Norderyd O, Sjodin B, Sondell K: Oral health of individuals aged 3–80 years in Jonkoping, Sweden during 30 years (1973–2003). I. Review of findings on dental care habits and knowledge of oral health. Swed Dent J 2005, 29(4):125-138.
- [10]Hugoson A, Koch G, Gothberg C, Helkimo AN, Lundin SA, Norderyd O, Sjodin B, Sondell K: Oral health of individuals aged 3–80 years in Jonkoping, Sweden during 30 years (1973–2003). II. Review of clinical and radiographic findings. Swed Dent J 2005, 29(4):139-155.
- [11]Ahlqwist M, Bengtsson C, Hakeberg M, Hagglin C: Dental status of women in a 24-year longitudinal and cross-sectional study. Results from a population study of women in Goteborg. Acta Odontol Scand 1999, 57(3):162-167.
- [12]Ahlqwist M, Bengtsson C, Grondahl HG, Lapidus L: Social factors and tooth loss in a 12-year follow-up study of women in Gothenburg, Sweden. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1991, 19(3):141-146.
- [13]Ahlqwist M, Begtsson C, Grondahl HG, Lapidus L: A 12-year cross-sectional and longitudinal radiographic study of dental restorations in women in Gothenburg, Sweden. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1988, 16(3):175-180.
- [14]Hiidenkari T, Parvinen T, Helenius H: Missing teeth and lost teeth of adults aged 30 years and over in south-western Finland. Community Dent Health 1996, 13(4):215-222.
- [15]Muller F, Naharro M, Carlsson GE: What are the prevalence and incidence of tooth loss in the adult and elderly population in Europe? Clin Oral Implants Res 2007, 18(Suppl 3):2-14.
- [16]Donaldson AN, Everitt B, Newton T, Steele J, Sherriff M, Bower E: The effects of social class and dental attendance on oral health. J Dent Res 2008, 87(1):60-64.
- [17]Aleksejuniene J, Holst D, Grytten JI, Eriksen HM: Causal patterns of dental health in populations. An empirical approach. Caries Res 2002, 36(4):233-240.
- [18]Hjern A, Grindefjord M, Sundberg H, Rosen M: Social inequality in oral health and use of dental care in Sweden. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2001, 29(3):167-174.
- [19]Bengtsson C, Blohme G, Hallberg L, Hallstrom T, Isaksson B, Korsan-Bengtsen K, Rybo G, Tibblin E, Tibblin G, Westerberg H: The study of women in Gothenburg 1968-1969--a population study. General design, purpose and sampling results. Acta Med Scand 1973, 193(4):311-318.
- [20]Bengtsson C, Ahlqwist M, Andersson K, Bjorkelund C, Lissner L, Soderstrom M: The Prospective Population Study of Women in Gothenburg, Sweden, 1968–69 to 1992–93. A 24-year follow-up study with special reference to participation, representativeness, and mortality. Scand J Prim Health Care 1997, 15(4):214-219.
- [21]Bengtsson C, Gredmark T, Hallberg L, Hallstrom T, Isaksson B, Lapidus L, Lindquist O, Lindstedt S, Lurie M, Nystrom E, et al.: The population study of women in Gothenburg 1980–81–the third phase of a longitudinal study. Comparison between participants and non-participants. Scand J Soc Med 1989, 17(2):141-145.
- [22]Bjorkelund C, Andersson-Hange D, Andersson K, Bengtsson C, Blomstrand A, Bondyr-Carlsson D, Eiben G, Rodstrom K, Sjoberg A, Sundh V, et al.: Secular trends in cardiovascular risk factors with a 36-year perspective: observations from 38- and 50-year-olds in the Population Study of Women in Gothenburg. Scand J Prim Health Care 2008, 26(3):140-146.
- [23]Ahlqwist M: Women's teeth. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of women in Gothenburg, Sweden, with special reference to tooth loss and restorations. Swed Dent J Suppl 1989, 62:1-84.
- [24]Carlsson G: Social mobility and class structure. Lund: Gleerup; 1958.
- [25]Consumer Price Index. http://www.scb.se/Pages/TableAndChart____35667.aspx webcite
- [26]Pihlgren K, Forsberg H, Sjodin L, Lundgren P, Wanman A: Changes in tooth mortality between 1990 and 2002 among adults in Vasterbotten County, Sweden: influence of socioeconomic factors, general health, smoking, and dental care habits on tooth mortality. Swed Dent J 2011, 35(2):77-88.
- [27]Pearce MS, Thomson WM, Walls AW, Steele JG: Lifecourse socio-economic mobility and oral health in middle age. J Dent Res 2009, 88(10):938-941.
- [28]Astrom AN, Ekback G, Ordell S, Unell L: Socio-behavioral predictors of changes in dentition status: a prospective analysis of the 1942 Swedish birth cohort. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2011, 39(4):300-310.
- [29]Thorstensson H, Johansson B: Why do some people lose teeth across their lifespan whereas others retain a functional dentition into very old age? Gerodontology 2010, 27(1):19-25.
- [30]Locker D, Ford J, Leake JL: Incidence of and risk factors for tooth loss in a population of older Canadians. J Dent Res 1996, 75(2):783-789.
- [31]Ahacic K, Thorslund M: Changes in dental status and dental care utilization in the Swedish population over three decades: age, period, or cohort effects? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2008, 36(2):118-127.