Combined examination of sequence and copy number variations in human deafness genes improves diagnosis for cases of genetic deafness

BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders

Xi Lin¹  Huawei Li²  Jianjun Wang¹  Jingqiao Lu¹  Haiting Ji² 

[1] Department of Otolaryngology, Emory University School of Medicine, 615 Michael Street, Atlanta, GA 30322-3030, USA;Department of Otolaryngology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, #83 Fenyang Road, Shanghai 200031, P.R China

关键词: Hearing;    Deafness gene panel;    Next-generation sequencing;    Sequence mutations;    Copy number variations;    Genetic deafness;   

Others  :  1084620
DOI  :  10.1186/1472-6815-14-9

 received in 2014-04-15, accepted in 2014-08-26,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Copy number variations (CNVs) are the major type of structural variation in the human genome, and are more common than DNA sequence variations in populations. CNVs are important factors for human genetic and phenotypic diversity. Many CNVs have been associated with either resistance to diseases or identified as the cause of diseases. Currently little is known about the role of CNVs in causing deafness. CNVs are currently not analyzed by conventional genetic analysis methods to study deafness. Here we detected both DNA sequence variations and CNVs affecting 80 genes known to be required for normal hearing.

Methods

Coding regions of the deafness genes were captured by a hybridization-based method and processed through the standard next-generation sequencing (NGS) protocol using the Illumina platform. Samples hybridized together in the same reaction were analyzed to obtain CNVs. A read depth based method was used to measure CNVs at the resolution of a single exon. Results were validated by the quantitative PCR (qPCR) based method.

Results

Among 79 sporadic cases clinically diagnosed with sensorineural hearing loss, we identified previously-reported disease-causing sequence mutations in 16 cases. In addition, we identified a total of 97 CNVs (72 CNV gains and 25 CNV losses) in 27 deafness genes. The CNVs included homozygous deletions which may directly give rise to deleterious effects on protein functions known to be essential for hearing, as well as heterozygous deletions and CNV gains compounded with sequence mutations in deafness genes that could potentially harm gene functions.

Conclusions

We studied how CNVs in known deafness genes may result in deafness. Data provided here served as a basis to explain how CNVs disrupt normal functions of deafness genes. These results may significantly expand our understanding about how various types of genetic mutations cause deafness in humans.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Ji et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Smith RJ, Bale JF Jr, White KR: Sensorineural hearing loss in children. Lancet 2005, 365(9462):879-890.
• [2]Hilgert N, Smith RJ, Van Camp G: Forty-six genes causing nonsyndromic hearing impairment: Which ones should be analyzed in DNA diagnostics? Mutat Res 2009, 681(2–3):189-196.
• [3]Shearer AE, Deluca AP, Hildebrand MS, Taylor KR, Gurrola J, Scherer S 2nd, Scheetz TE, Smith RJ: Comprehensive genetic testing for hereditary hearing loss using massively parallel sequencing. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 2010, 10(49):21104-21109.
• [4]Dror AA, Avraham KB: Hearing loss: mechanisms revealed by genetics and cell biology. Annu Rev Genet 2009, 43:411-437.
• [5]Lin X, Tang W, Ahmad S, Lu J, Colby CC, Zhu J, Yu Q: Applications of targeted gene capture and next-generation sequencing technologies in studies of human deafness and other genetic disabilities. Hear Res 2012, 288(1–2):67-76.
• [6]Zhang F, Gu W, Hurles ME, Lupski JR: Copy number variation in human health, disease, and evolution. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2009, 10:451-481.
• [7]Tang WS, Qian D, Ahmad S, Mattox D, Todd NW, Harrison H, Huang S, Li Y, Wang Y, Li HW, Lin X: A low-cost exon capture method suitable for large-scale screening of genetic deafness by the massively-parallel sequencing approach. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2012, 16(6):536-542.
• [8]Mills RE, Walter K, Stewart C, Handsaker RE, Chen K, Alkan C, Abyzov A, Yoon SC, Ye K, Cheetham RK, Korbel JO: Mapping copy number variation by population-scale genome sequencing. Nature 2011, 470(7332):59-65.
• [9]Zhao M, Wang Q, Jia P, Zhao Z: Computational tools for copy number variation (CNV) detection using next-generation sequencing data: features and perspectives. BMC Bioinformatics 2013, 14(Suppl 11):S1. BioMed Central Full Text
• [10]Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, Kondrashov AS, Sunyaev SR: A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods 2010, 7(4):248-249.
• [11]Kumar P, Henikoff S, Ng PC: Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc 2009, 4(7):1073-1081.
• [12]Hoang Dinh E, Ahmad S, Chang Q, Tang W, Stong B, Lin X: Diverse deafness mechanisms of connexin mutations revealed by studies using in vitro approaches and mouse models. Brain Res 2009, 1277(24):52-69.
• [13]Xiao S, Yu C, Chou X, Yuan W, Wang Y, Bu L, Fu G, Qian M, Yang J, Shi Y, Zhao G, Kong X, Zhao G, Kong X: Dentinogenesis imperfecta 1 with or without progressive hearing loss is associated with distinct mutations in DSPP. Nat Genet 2001, 27(2):201-204.
• [14]Redon R, Ishikawa S, Fitch KR, Feuk L, Perry GH, Andrews TD, Fiegler H, Shapero MH, Carson AR, Chen W, Jones KW, Scherer SW, Hurles ME: Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature 2006, 444(7118):444-454.
• [15]Shearer AE, Kolbe DL, Azaiez H, Sloan CM, Frees KL, Weaver AE, Clark ET, Nishimura CJ, Black-Ziegelbein EA, Smith RJ: Copy number variants are a common cause of non-syndromic hearing loss. Genome Med 2014, 6(5):37. BioMed Central Full Text
• [16]Bademci G, Diaz-Horta O, Guo S, Duman D, Van Booven D, Foster Ii J, Cengiz FB, Blanton S, Tekin M: Identification of Copy Number Variants Through Whole-Exome Sequencing in Autosomal Recessive Nonsyndromic Hearing Loss. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2014, 12(1):1201-1212.
• [17]Armour JA, Palla R, Zeeuwen PL, den Heijer M, Schalkwijk J, Hollox EJ: Accurate, high-throughput typing of copy number variation using paralogue ratios from dispersed repeats. Nucleic Acids Res 2007, 35(3):e19.
• [18]Yoon S, Xuan Z, Makarov V, Ye K, Sebat J: Sensitive and accurate detection of copy number variants using read depth of coverage. Genome Res 2009, 19(9):1586-1592.
• [19]Iafrate AJ, Feuk L, Rivera MN, Listewnik ML, Donahoe PK, Qi Y, Scherer SW, Lee C: Detection of large-scale variation in the human genome. Nat Genet 2004, 36(9):949-951.