Family medicine trainees’ clinical experience of chronic disease during training: a cross-sectional analysis from the registrars’ clinical encounters in training study

BMC Medical Education

Mieke van Driel⁵  Allison Thomson²  John Scott⁶  Caroline Laurence¹  Neil Spike³  Susan Goode⁷  James Pearlman²  Patrick McElduff⁴  Amanda Tapley⁶  Kim Henderson⁶  Simon Morgan⁶  Parker Magin⁶ 

[1] Discipline of General Practice, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia;Discipline of General Practice, the University of Newcastle, Callaghan 2308, NSW, Australia;Victorian Metropolitan Alliance, Melbourne, Australia;School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia;Academic Discipline of General Practice, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia;General Practice Training Valley to Coast, Mayfield, Australia;Hunter Translational Cancer Research Unit, School of Medicine and Public Health, the University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia

关键词: Physician's practice patterns;    Chronic disease;    Graduate;    Medical;    Education;    Family practice;   

Others  :  1090010
DOI  :  10.1186/s12909-014-0260-7

 received in 2014-06-17, accepted in 2014-12-02,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

A broad case-mix in family physicians’ (general practitioners’, GPs’) vocational trainee experience is deemed essential in producing competent independent practitioners. It is suggested that the patient-mix should include common and significant conditions and be similar to that of established GPs. But the content of contemporary GP trainees’ clinical experience in training is not well-documented. In particular, how well trainees’ experience reflects changing general practice demographics (with an increasing prevalence of chronic disease) is unknown. We aimed to establish levels of trainees’ clinical exposure to chronic disease in training (and associations of this exposure) and to establish content differences in chronic disease consultations (compared to other consultations), and differences in trainees’ actions arising from these consultations.

Methods

A cross-sectional analysis from the Registrars’ Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) study, a cohort study of GP registrars’ (trainees’) consultations in four Australian GP training organisations. Trainees record detailed data from 60 consecutive consultations per six-month training term. Diagnoses/problems encountered are coded using the International Classification of Primary Care-2 PLUS (ICPC-2 PLUS). A classification system derived from ICPC-2 PLUS was used to define diagnoses/problems as chronic/non-chronic disease. The outcome factor for analyses was trainees’ consultations in which chronic disease was encountered. Independent variables were a range of patient, trainee, practice, consultation and educational factors.

Results

Of 48,112 consultations (of 400 individual trainees), 29.5% included chronic disease problems/diagnoses. Associations of a consultation including chronic disease were the patient being older, male, and having consulted the trainee previously, and the practice routinely bulk-billing (not personally charging) patients. Consultations involving a chronic disease lasted longer, dealt with more problems/diagnoses, and were more likely to result in specialist referrals and trainees generating a personal learning goal. They were associated with less pathology tests being ordered.

Conclusions

Trainees saw chronic disease less frequently than have established GPs in comparable studies. The longer duration and more frequent generation of learning goals in chronic disease-containing consultations suggest trainees may find these consultations particularly challenging. Our findings may inform the design of measures aimed at increasing the chronic disease component of trainees’ patient-mix.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Magin et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]RACGP Standards for General Practice Education and Training - Programs and Providers. 2005. http://www.racgp.org.au/download/Documents/Vocational%20training/vocational-training-standards.pdf Accessed 16/12/14.
• [2]Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) Curriculum 2011. At http://curriculum.racgp.org.au/ Accessed 2/2/13.
• [3]Exam Handbook for candidates: RACGP Examination Policies and Processes. 2013. Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Melbourne. Available at: http://www.racgp.org.au/download/Documents/Policies/Assessment/2014examhandbook.pdf Accessed 30/5/14
• [4]Hasler J: Do trainees see patients with chronic illness? BMJ 1983, 287(6406):1679-1682.
• [5]Carney TA: Clinical experience of a trainee in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract 1979, 29(198):40-44.
• [6]Fleming DM: A comparison of the practice activities of trainees and principals. J R Coll Gen Pract 1986, 36(286):212-216.
• [7]O'Flanagan PH: One trainee's clinical experience. J R Coll Gen Pract 1977, 27(177):227-230.
• [8]Fouracre R, Savory JN: Steering patients with selected conditions to trainees. J R Coll Gen Pract 1980, 30(221):729-733.
• [9]Pearson CR, Goss BM: Comparison of the workload of a trainer and trainee. J R Coll Gen Pract 1989, 39(325):320-323.
• [10]Fairley R: Patients who usually consult the trainee in general practice. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984, 288(6410):33-35.
• [11]Parkerson G, Wilson E: Clinical experience during family medicine residency training. South Med J 1987, 80(7):895-900.
• [12]Caine N, Strang J, Acheson RM: Study of trainer/trainee workload with special reference to the care of the elderly. J R Coll Gen Pract 1985, 35(278):419-422.
• [13]Weeda G, Hutter AW, Groenier KH, Schuling J: The workload of trainees in general practice. Med Educ 1997, 31(2):138-143.
• [14]Eccles M, Bamford C, Steen N, Russell I: Case mix and content of trainee consultations: findings from the north of England study of standards and performance in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 1994, 44(387):437-440.
• [15]World Health Organization: Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases 2010. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. at http://www.who.int/nmh/publications/ncd_report2010/en/ (accessed 23/4/13).
• [16]Schers H, Bor H, van den Hoogen H, van Weel C: What went and what came? Morbidity trends in general practice from the Netherlands. Eur J Gen Pract 2008, 14(Suppl 1):13-24.
• [17]Hughes H, Jordan KP, Rajaratnam G, Fawcett S, Croft P: Recent changes in general practice morbidity in older people. Age Ageing 2008, 37(5):572-575.
• [18]Uijen AA, van de Lisdonk EH: Multimorbidity in primary care: prevalence and trend over the last 20 years. Eur J Gen Pract 2008, 14(Suppl 1):28-32.
• [19]de Jong J, Visser MRM, Mohrs J, Wieringa-de Waard M: Opening the black box: the patient mix of GP trainees. Br J Gen Pract 2011, 61(591):e650-e657.
• [20]De Jong J, Visser MRM, Wieringa-de Waard M: Exploring differences in patient mix in a cohort of GP trainees and their trainers. BMJ Open 2011, 1:e000318. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000318
• [21]Morgan S, Magin PJ, Henderson KM, Goode SM, Scott J, Bowe SJ, Regan CM, Sweeney KP, Jackel J, van Driel ML: The registrar clinical encounters in training (ReCEnT) study – protocol. BMC Fam Pract 2012, 13:50. BioMed Central Full Text
• [22]Britt H: A new coding tool for computerised clinical systems in primary care–ICPC plus. Aust Fam Physician 1997, 26(Suppl 2):S79-S82.
• [23]O'Halloran J, Miller GC, Britt H: Defining chronic conditions for primary care with ICPC-2. Fam Pract 2004, 21(4):381-386.
• [24]Australian Standard Geographical Classification (ASGC) - 2006. at http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/1AE106C101420508CA2571A900170741: accessed 23/4/13
• [25]Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2039.0 - Information Paper: An Introduction to Socio-economic Indexes of Areas (SEIFA), 2006. Available at: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/2039.0/ [accessed 23/4/13]
• [26]O'Halloran J, Harrison C, Britt H: The management of chronic problems. Aust Fam Physician 2008, 37(9):697.
• [27]AGPT Registrar satisfaction survey 2013. Australian General Practice Training Limited and Australian Council of Educational Research. Available at: http://www.gpet.com.au/About-Us/Policies-/Research-and-Reports. Accessed 30/5/14.
• [28]GPET Annual Report 2013. General Practice Education and Training Limited. Available at: http://www.gpet.com.au/About-Us/Policies-/Research-and-Reports. Accessed 30/5/14
• [29]Australian Medical Workforce Advisory Committee (2005), The General Practice Workforce in Australia: Supply and Requirements to 2013, AMWAC Report 2005.2, Sydney.
• [30]Bonevski B, Magin P, Horton G, Foster M, Girgis A: Response rates in GP surveys - trialling two recruitment strategies. Aust Fam Physician 2011, 40(6):427-430.
• [31]Nieman LZ, Cheng L: Chronic illness needs educated doctors: an innovative primary care training program for chronic illness education. Med Teach 2011, 33(6):e340-e348.
• [32]Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen IHAP, Essed GGM, Scherpbier AJJA, van der Vleuten CPM: The impacts of supervision, patient mix, and numbers of students on the effectiveness of clinical rotations. Acad Med 2002, 77(4):332-335.
• [33]van der Zwet J, Hanssen VG, Zwietering PJ, Muijtjens AM, Van der Vleuten CP, Metsemakers JF, Scherpbier AJ: Workplace learning in general practice: supervision, patient mix and independence emerge from the black box once again. Med Teach 2010, 32(7):e294-e299.
• [34]Dong T, Artino AR Jr, Durning SJ, Denton GD: Relationship between clinical experiences and internal medicine clerkship performance. Med Educ 2012, 46(7):689-697.
• [35]de Jong J, Visser M, Wieringa-de Waard M: Steering the patient mix of GP trainees: results of a randomized controlled intervention. Med Teach 2013, 235:101-108.
• [36]Bonney A, Jones SC, Iverson D: The older patient, the general practitioner and the trainee: patients' attitudes and implications for training. Educ Prim Care 2012, 23(3):186-195.
• [37]Bonney A, Phillipson L, Jones SC, Iverson D: Older patients' attitudes to general practice registrars - a qualitative study. Aust Fam Physician 2009, 38(11):927-931.
• [38]de Jong J, Visser MRM, Wieringa-de Waard M: Who determines the patient mix of GP trainees? The role of the receptionist. Fam Pract 2011, 28(3):287-293.