Partitioning of excess mortality in population-based cancer patient survival studies using flexible parametric survival models

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Paul W Dickman³  Magnus Björkholm²  Per Hall³  Kamila Czene³  Therese ML Andersson³  Paul C Lambert¹  Sandra Eloranta³ 

[1] Center for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, UK;Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Sweden;Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, , Box 281, Sweden

关键词: Competing risks;    Regression models;    Relative survival;    Cancer;    Survival analysis;   

Others  :  1136601
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2288-12-86

 received in 2011-08-18, accepted in 2012-06-24,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Relative survival is commonly used for studying survival of cancer patients as it captures both the direct and indirect contribution of a cancer diagnosis on mortality by comparing the observed survival of the patients to the expected survival in a comparable cancer-free population. However, existing methods do not allow estimation of the impact of isolated conditions (e.g., excess cardiovascular mortality) on the total excess mortality. For this purpose we extend flexible parametric survival models for relative survival, which use restricted cubic splines for the baseline cumulative excess hazard and for any time-dependent effects.

Methods

In the extended model we partition the excess mortality associated with a diagnosis of cancer through estimating a separate baseline excess hazard function for the outcomes under investigation. This is done by incorporating mutually exclusive background mortality rates, stratified by the underlying causes of death reported in the Swedish population, and by introducing cause of death as a time-dependent effect in the extended model. This approach thereby enables modeling of temporal trends in e.g., excess cardiovascular mortality and remaining cancer excess mortality simultaneously. Furthermore, we illustrate how the results from the proposed model can be used to derive crude probabilities of death due to the component parts, i.e., probabilities estimated in the presence of competing causes of death.

Results

The method is illustrated with examples where the total excess mortality experienced by patients diagnosed with breast cancer is partitioned into excess cardiovascular mortality and remaining cancer excess mortality.

Conclusions

The proposed method can be used to simultaneously study disease patterns and temporal trends for various causes of cancer-consequent deaths. Such information should be of interest for patients and clinicians as one way of improving prognosis after cancer is through adapting treatment strategies and follow-up of patients towards reducing the excess mortality caused by side effects of the treatment.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Eloranta et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Fig. 10.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Perme MP, Stare J, Estève J: On Estimation in Relative Survival. Biometrics 2012, 68(1):113.
• [2]Bird BR, Swain SM: Cardiac toxicity in breast cancer survivors: review of potential cardiac problems. Clin Cancer Res 2008, 14:14.
• [3]Roychoudhuri R, Robinson D, Putcha V, Cuzick J, Darby S, Møller H: Increased cardiovascular mortality more than fifteen years after radiotherapy for breast cancer: a population-based study. BMC Cancer 2007, 7:9. BioMed Central Full Text
• [4]Violet JA, Harmer C: Breast cancer: improving outcome following adjuvant radiotherapy. Br J Radiol 2004, 77(922):811.
• [5]Darby S, McGale P, Peto R, Granath F, Hall P, Ekbom A: Mortality from cardiovascular disease more than 10 years after radiotherapy for breast cancer: nationwide cohort study of 90 000 Swedish women. BMJ 2003, 326(7383):256.
• [6]Hooning M, Aleman BM, van Rosmalen AJ, Kuenen MA, Klijn JG, van Leeuwen FE: Cause-specific mortality in long-term survivors of breast cancer: A 25-year follow-up study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006, 64(4):1081.
• [7]Putter H, Fiocco M, Geskus R: Tutorial in biostatistics: competing risks and multistate models. Stat Med 2007, 26(11):2389.
• [8]Pintilie M, Bai Y, Yun L, Hodgson DC: The analysis of case cohort design in the presence of competing risks with application to estimate the risk of delayed cardiac toxicity among Hodgkin Lymphoma survivors. Stat Med 2010, 29(27):2802.
• [9]Fine J, Gray R: A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. JASA 1999, 94:496.
• [10]Royston P, Parmar MK: Flexible parametric proportional-hazards and proportional-odds models for censored survival data, with application to prognostic modelling and estimation of treatment effects. Stat Med 2002, 21(15):2175.
• [11]Nelson CP, Lambert PC, Squire IB, Jones DR: Flexible parametric models for relative survival, with application in coronary heart disease. Stat Med 2007, 26(30):5486.
• [12]Durrleman S, Simon R: Flexible regression models with cubic splines. Stat Med 1989, 8(5):551.
• [13]Cronin KA, Feuer EJ: Cumulative cause-specific mortality for cancer patients in the presence of other causes: a crude analogue of relative survival. Stat Med 2000, 19(13):1729.
• [14]Lambert P, Dickman P, Nelson C, Royston P: Estimating the crude probability of death due to cancer and other causes using relative survival models. Stat Med 2010, 29(7-8):885.
• [15]Dickman PW, Sloggett A, Hills M, Hakulinen T: Regression models for relative survival. Stat Med 2004, 23:51.
• [16]Perme MP, Henderson R, Stare J: An approach to estimation in relative survival regression. Biostatistics 2009, 100:136.
• [17]McKeague I, Sasieni P: A partly parametric additive risk model. Biometrica 1994, 81:501.
• [18]Cortese G, Scheike TH: Dynamic regression hazards models for relative survival. Stat Med 2008, 27(18):3563.
• [19]Stare J, Pohar M, Henderson R: Goodness of fit of relative survival models. Stat Med 2005, 24(24):3911.
• [20]Lambert P, Royston P: Further development of flexible parametric models for survival analysis. The Stata J 2010, 9(2):265.
• [21]Barlow L, Westergren K, Holmberg L, Talbäck M: The completeness of the Swedish Cancer Register: a sample survey for year 1998. Acta Oncol 2009, 48:27.
• [22]Taylor CW, Brønnum D, Darby SC, Gagliardi G, Hall P, Jensen MB, McGale P, Nisbet A, Ewertz M: Cardiac dose estimates from Danish and Swedish breast cancer radiotherapy during 1977-2001. Radiother Oncol 2011, 100(2):1976.
• [23]Nystrøm L, Larsson LG, Rutqvist LE, Lindgren A, Lindqvist M, Rydén S, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Fagerberg G, Frisell J: Determination of cause of death among breast cancer cases in the Swedish randomized mammography screening trials. A comparison between official statistics and validation by an endpoint committee. Acta Oncol 1995, 34(2):145.
• [24]Dickman PW, Auvinen A, Voutilainen ET, Hakulinen T: Measuring social class differences in cancer patient survival: is it necessary to control for social class differences in general population mortality? A Finnish population-based study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998, 52(11):727.
• [25]Prochazka M, Hall P, Gagliardi G, Granath F, Nilsson BN, Shields PG, Tennis M, Czene K: Ionizing radiation and tobacco use increases the risk of a subsequent lung carcinoma in women with breast cancer: case-only design. J Clin Oncol 2005, 23(30):7467.
• [26]Ng AK, Mauch PM: Late effects of Hodgkin’s disease and its treatment. Cancer J 2009, 15(2):164.
• [27]Andersson TM, Dickman PW, Eloranta S, Lambert PC: Estimating and modelling cure in population-based cancer studies within the framework of flexible parametric survival models. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011, 11:96. BioMed Central Full Text
• [28]Human Mortality Database (data downloaded on 2010-04-13). University of California, Berkeley (USA), and Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (Germany) [http://www.mortality.org] webcite
• [29]Wilmoth J, Andreev K, Jdanov D, Glei D: Methods protocol for the Human Mortality Database. Tech. rep., University of California, Berkeley and Max Plack Institute for Demographic Research 2007.