Identifying targets of the Sox domain protein Dichaete in the Drosophila CNS via targeted expression of dominant negative proteins

BMC Developmental Biology

Steven Russell²  Jelena Aleksic²  Shih Pei Shen¹ 

[1] Present address: Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK;Cambridge Systems Biology Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

关键词: Genomics;    Dominant-negative;    CNS;    Drosophila;    Dichaete;    Sox;   

Others  :  1086131
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-213X-13-1

 received in 2012-10-24, accepted in 2013-01-03,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Group B Sox domain transcription factors play important roles in metazoan central nervous system development. They are, however, difficult to study as mutations often have pleiotropic effects and other Sox family members can mask phenotypes due to functional compensation. In Drosophila melanogaster, the Sox gene Dichaete is dynamically expressed in the embryonic CNS, where it is known to have functional roles in neuroblasts and the ventral midline. In this study, we use inducible dominant negative proteins in combination with ChIP, immunohistochemistry and genome-wide expression profiling to further dissect the role of Dichaete in these two tissues.

Results

We generated two dominant negative Dichaete constructs, one lacking a DNA binding domain and the other fused to the Engrailed transcriptional repressor domain. We expressed these tissue-specifically in the midline and in neuroblasts using the UAS/GAL4 system, validating their use at the phenotypic level and with known target genes. Using ChIP and immunohistochemistry, we identified two new likely direct Dichaete target genes, commisureless in the midline and asense in the neuroectoderm. We performed genome-wide expression profiling in stage 8–9 embryos, identifying almost a thousand potential tissue-specific Dichaete targets, with half of these genes showing evidence of Dichaete binding in vivo. These include a number of genes with known roles in CNS development, including several components of the Notch, Wnt and EGFR signalling pathways.

Conclusions

As well as identifying commisureless as a target, our data indicate that Dichaete helps establish its expression during early midline development but has less effect on its established later expression, highlighting Dichaete action on tissue specific enhancers. An analysis of the broader range of candidate Dichaete targets indicates that Dichaete plays diverse roles in CNS development, with the 500 or so Dichaete-bound putative targets including a number of transcription factors, signalling pathway components and terminal differentiation genes. In the early neurectoderm we implicate Dichaete in the lateral inhibition pathway and show that Dichaete acts to repress the proneural gene asense. Our analysis also reveals that dominant negatives cause off-target effects, highlighting the need to use other experimental data for validating findings from dominant negative studies.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Shen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Kalinka AT, Varga KM, Gerrard DT, Preibisch S, Corcoran DL, Jarrells J, Ohler U, Bergman CM, Tomancak P: Gene expression divergence recapitulates the developmental hourglass model. Nature 2010, 468:811-814.
• [2]Masui S, Nakatake Y, Toyooka Y, Shimosato D, Yagi R, Takahashi K, Okochi H, Okuda A, Matoba R, Sharov AA, et al.: Pluripotency governed by Sox2 via regulation of Oct3/4 expression in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat Cell Biol 2007, 9(6):625-635.
• [3]Blanco J, Girard F, Kamachi Y, Kondoh H, Gehring WJ: Functional analysis of the chicken delta1-crystallin enhancer activity in Drosophila reveals remarkable evolutionary conservation between chicken and fly. Development 2005, 132:1895-1905.
• [4]Nambu P, Nambu J: The Drosophila fishhook gene encodes a HMG domain protein essential for segmentation and CNS development. Development 1996, 122:3467-3475.
• [5]Russell SRH, Sanchez-Soriano N, Wright CR, Ashburner M: The Dichaete gene of Drosophila melanogaster encodes a SOX-domain protein required for embryonic segmentation. Development 1996, 122:3669-3676.
• [6]Guth SIE, Wegner M: Having it both ways: Sox protein function between conservation and innovation. Cell Mol Life Sci 2008, 65:3000-3018.
• [7]Phochanukul N, Russell S: No backbone but lots of Sox: Invertebrate Sox genes. Int J Bioc Cell Bio 2010, 42:453-464.
• [8]Wegner M: SOX after SOX: SOXession regulates neurogenesis. Genes Dev 2011, 25:2423-2428.
• [9]Buescher M, Hing FS, Chia W: Formation of neuroblasts in the embryonic central nervous system of Drosophila melanogaster is controlled by SoxNeuro. Development 2002,  :4193-4203.
• [10]Overton P, Meadows L, Urban J, Russell S: Evidence for differential and redundant function of the Sox genes Dichaete and SoxN during CNS development in Drosophila. Development 2002, 129:4219-4228.
• [11]Miyagi S, Kato H, Okuda A: Role of SoxB1 transcription factors in development. Cell Mol Life Sci 2009, 66:3675-3684.
• [12]Cremazy F, Berta P, Girard F: Genome-wide analysis of Sox genes in Drosophila melanogaster. Mech Dev 2001, 109:371-375.
• [13]McKimmmie C, Woerfel G, Russell S: Conserved genomic organisation of group B Sox genes in insects. BMC Genet 2005, 6:26.21-26.15.
• [14]Wilson MJ, Dearden PK: Evolution of the insect Sox genes. BMC Evol Biol 2008, 8:120.
• [15]Sanchez-Soriano N, Russell S: The Drosophila Sox-domain protein Dichaete is required for the development of the central nervous system midline. Development 1998, 125:3989-3996.
• [16]Zhao G, Boekhoff-Falk G, Wilson BA, Skeath JB: Linking pattern formation to cell-type specification: Dichaete and Ind directly repress achaete gene expression in the Drosophila CNS. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2007, 106:3847-3852.
• [17]Zhao G, Skeath J: The Sox-domain containing gene Dichaete/fish-hook acts in concert with vnd and ind to regulate cell fate in the Drosophila neuroectoderm. Development 2002, 129:1165-1174.
• [18]Sanchez-Soriano N, Russell S: Regulatory mutations of the Drosophila Sox gene Dichaete reveal new functions in embryonic brain and hindgut development. Dev Biol 2000, 129:1165-1174.
• [19]Ma Y, Tel KC, Gao Y, Niemitz E, Mosher J, Mukherjee A, Mutsuddi M, Huseinovic N, Crews ST, Johnson WA, et al.: Functional interactions between Drosophila bHLH/PAS, Sox, and POU transcription factors regulate CNS midline expression of the slit gene. J Neurosci 2000, 20:4596-4605.
• [20]Ambrosetti DC, Basilico C, Dailey L: Synergistic activation of the fibroblast growth factor 4 enhancer by Sox2 and Oct-3 depends on protein-protein interactions facilitated by a specific spatial arrangement of factor binding sites. Mol Cell Biol 1997, 17:6321-6329.
• [21]Remenyi A, Lins K, Nissen LJ, Reinbold R, Scholer HR, Wilmanns M: Crystal structure of a POU/HMG/DNA ternary complex suggests differential assembly of Oct4 and Sox2 on two enhancers. Genes Dev 2003, 17:2048-2059.
• [22]Maurange C, Cheng L, Gould AP: Temporal Transcription Factors and Their Targets Schedule the End of Neural Proliferation in Drosophila. Cell 2008, 133:891-902.
• [23]MacArthur S, Li XY, Li J, Brown JB, Chu HC, Zeng L, Grondona BP, Hechmer A, Simirenko L, Keranen SV, et al.: Developmental roles of 21 Drosophila transcription factors are determined by quantitative differences in binding to an overlapping set of thousands of genomic regions. Genome Biol 2009, 10:R80.
• [24]Negre N, Brown CD, Ma L, Bristow CA, Miller SW, Wagner U, Kheradpour P, Eaton ML, Loriaux P, Sealfon R, et al.: A cis-regulatory map of the Drosophila genome. Nature 2011, 471:527-531.
• [25]Brand AH, Perrimon N: Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 1993, 118:401-415.
• [26]Kishi M, Mizuseki K, Sasai N, Yamazaki H, Shiota K, Nakanishi S, Sasai Y: Requirement of Sox2-mediated signalling for differentiation of early Xenopus neuroectoderm. Development 2000, 127:791-800.
• [27]Graham V, Khudyakov J, Ellis P, Pevny L: SOX2 functions to maintain neural progenitor identity. Neuron 2003, 39:749-765.
• [28]Okuda Y, Ogura E, Kondoh H, Kamachi Y: B1 SOX coordinate cell specification with patterning and morphogenesis in the early zebrafish embryo. PLoS Genet 2010, 6:e1000936.
• [29]John A, Smith ST, Jaynes JB: Inserting the Ftz homeodomain into Engrailed creates a dominant transcriptional repressor that specifically turns off Ftz target genes in vivo. Development 1995, 121:1801-1813.
• [30]Vickers ER, Sharrocks AD: The use of inducible engrailed fusion proteins to study the cellular functions of eukaryotic transcription factors. Methods 2002, 26:270-280.
• [31]Kambadur R, Koizumi K, Stivers C, Nagle J, Poole SJ, Odenwald WF: Regulation of POU genes by castor and hunchback establishes layered compartments in the Drosophila CNS. Genes Dev 1998, 12:246-260.
• [32]Ruiz-Gomez M, Ghysen A: The expression and role of a proneural gene, achaete, in the development of the larval nervous system of Drosophila. EMBO J 1993, 12:1121-1130.
• [33]Tear G, Harris R, Sutaria S, Kilomanski K, Goodman CS, Seeger MA: Commissureless controls growth cone guidance across the cns midline in Drosophila and encodes a novel membrane protein. Neuron 1996, 16:501-514.
• [34]Jarman AP, Brand M, Jan LY, Jan YN: The regulation and function of the helix-loop-helix gene, asense, in Drosophila neural precursors. Development 1993, 119:19-29.
• [35]Bergsland M, Ramskold D, Zaouter C, Klum S, Sandberg R, Muhr J: Sequentially acting Sox transcription factors in neural lineage development. Genes Dev 2011, 25:2453-2464.
• [36]Kearney JB, Wheeler SR, Estes P, Parente B, Crew ST: Gene expression profiling of the developing Drosophila CNS midline cells. Dev Biol 2004, 275:473-492.
• [37]Kumar S, Konikoff C, Van Emden B, Busick C, Davis KT, Ji S, Wu LW, Ramos H, Brody T, Panchanathan S, et al.: FlyExpress: visual mining of spatiotemporal patterns for genes and publications in Drosophila embryogenesis. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:3319-3320.
• [38]Herrmann C, Van de Sande B, Potier D, Aerts S: I-cisTarget: an integrative genomics method for the prediction of regulatory features and cis-regulatory modules. Nuc Acids Res 2012, 40:e114.
• [39]Ma Y, Niemitz EL, Nambu PA, Shan X, Sackerson C, Fujioka M, Goto T, Nambu JR: Gene regulatory functions of Drosophila Fish-hook, a high mobility group domain Sox protein. Mech Dev 1998, 73:169-182.
• [40]Campos-Ortega JA: Early neurogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. In The Development of Drosophila melanogaster vol II. Edited by Bate M, Martinez-Arias A. Long Island NY: Cold Spring Harbor Publ; 1993:1091-1130.
• [41]Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Kuhn M, Simonovic M, Roth A, Minguez P, Doerks T, Stark M, Muller J, Bork P, et al.: The STRING database in 2011: functional interaction networks of proteins, globally integrated and scored. Nuc Acids Res 2011, 39:D561-D568.
• [42]Keleman K, Riberio C, Dickson BJ: Comm function in commissural axon guidance: cell-autonomous sorting of Robo in vivo. Nat Neurosci 2005, 8:156-163.
• [43]Wheeler JC, Vanderzwan C, Xu X, Swantek D, Tracey WD, Gergen JP: Distinct in vivo requirements for establishment versus maintenance of transcriptional repression. Nat Genet 2002, 32:206-210.
• [44]Brand M, Jarman AP, Jan LY, Jan YN: Asense is a Drosophila neural precursor gene and is capable of initiating sense organ formation. Development 1993, 119:1-17.
• [45]Thomas JB, Crews ST, Goodman CS: Molecular genetics of the single-minded locus: a gene involved in the development of the Drosophila nervous system. Cell 1988, 52:133-141.
• [46]de Celis JF, Llimargas M, Casanova J: Ventral veinless, the gene encoding the Cf1a transcription factor, links positional information and cell differentiation during embryonic and imaginal development in Drosophila melanogaster. Development 1995, 121:3405-3416.
• [47]Zhao G, Wheeler SR, Skeath JB: Genetic control of dorsoventral patterning and neuroblast specification in the Drosophila Central Nervous System. Int J Dev Biol 2007, 51:107-115.
• [48]Pearson BJ, Doe CQ: Specification of temporal identity in the developing nervous system. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2004, 20:619-647.
• [49]Kan L, Isasena N, Zhang Z, Hu M, Zhao L-R, Jalali A, Sahni V, Kessler J: Sox1 acts through multiple independent pathways to promote neurogenesis. Dev Biol 2004, 269:580-594.
• [50]Chao AT, Jones WM, Bejsovec A: The HMG-box transcription factor SoxNeuro acts with Tcf to control Wg/Wnt signaling activity. Development 2007, 134:989-997.
• [51]Overton PM, Chia W, Buescher M: The Drosophila HMG-domain proteins SoxNeuro and Dichaete direct trichome formation via the activation of shavenbaby and the restriction of Wingless pathway activity. Development 2007, 134:2807-2813.
• [52]Bogdan S, Klambt C: Epidermal growth factor receptor signaling. Curr Biol 2001, 11:R292-R295.
• [53]Bernard P, Harley VR: Acquisition of SOX transcription factor specificity through protein–protein interaction, modulation of Wnt signalling and post-translational modification. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2010, 42:400-410.
• [54]Karess RE: P element mediated germ line transformation of Drosophila. In DNA cloning Volume II. Edited by Glover DM. Oxford: IRL Press; 1985:121-142.
• [55]Patel NH: Imaging neuronal subsets and other cell types in whole mount Drosophila embryos and and larvae using antibody probes. In Drosophila melanogaster: Practical Uses in Cell Biology. vol. 44 edition. Edited by Goldstein LSB, Fyrbeg E. New York: Academic; 1994:445-456.
• [56]Birch-Machin I, Gao S, Huen D, McGirr R, White RA, Russell S: Genomic analysis of heat-shock factor targets in Drosophila. Genome Biol 2005, 6:R63.
• [57]Contrino S, Smith RN, Butano D, Carr A, Hu F, Lyne R, Rutherford K, Kalderimis A, Sullivan J, Carbon S, et al.: ModMine: flexible access to modENCODE data. Nuc Acids Res 2012, 40:D1082-D1088.
• [58]Nicol JW, Helt GA, Blanchard SG Jr, Raja A, Loraine AE: The Integrated Genome Browser: free software for distribution and exploration of genome-scale datasets. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:2730-2731.
• [59]Lyne R, Smith R, Rutherford K, Wakeling M, Varley A, Guillier F, Janssens H, Ji W, McLaren P, North P, et al.: FlyMine: an integrated database for Drosophila and Anopheles genomics. Genome Biol 2007, 8:R129.
• [60]Buhler J, Ideker T, Haynor D: Dapple: improved techniques for finding spots on DNA microarrays. UW CSE Technical Report, UWTR 2000-08-05. 2000.
• [61]Huber W, Heydebreck AV, Sultmann H, Poustka A, Vingron M: Varience stabilization applied to microarray data calibration and to the quantification of differential expression. Bioinformatics 2002, 18:S96.
• [62]Baldi P, Long AD: A Bayesian framework for the analysis of microarray expression data: regularized t -test and statistical inferences of gene changes. Bioinformatics 2001, 17:509-519.