Rural-urban disparities in child nutrition in Bangladesh and Nepal

BMC Public Health

Bhavani Shankar³  Giacomo Zanello¹  Chittur S Srinivasan² 

[1] Oxford Department of International Development, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford, 3 Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3TB, UK;Department of Food Economics and Marketing, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AR, UK;Leverhulme Centre for Integrative Research on Agriculture and Health, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, 36, Gordon Square, London WC1H 0XG, UK

关键词: Nepal;    Bangladesh;    Developing countries;    Counterfactual decompositions;    Quantile regression;    Rural-Urban disparities;    Socio-economic characteristics;    Child nutrition;   

Others  :  1162101
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-13-581

 received in 2012-10-09, accepted in 2013-05-15,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

The persistence of rural-urban disparities in child nutrition outcomes in developing countries alongside rapid urbanisation and increasing incidence of child malnutrition in urban areas raises an important health policy question - whether fundamentally different nutrition policies and interventions are required in rural and urban areas. Addressing this question requires an enhanced understanding of the main drivers of rural-urban disparities in child nutrition outcomes especially for the vulnerable segments of the population. This study applies recently developed statistical methods to quantify the contribution of different socio-economic determinants to rural-urban differences in child nutrition outcomes in two South Asian countries – Bangladesh and Nepal.

Methods

Using DHS data sets for Bangladesh and Nepal, we apply quantile regression-based counterfactual decomposition methods to quantify the contribution of (1) the differences in levels of socio-economic determinants (covariate effects) and (2) the differences in the strength of association between socio-economic determinants and child nutrition outcomes (co-efficient effects) to the observed rural-urban disparities in child HAZ scores. The methodology employed in the study allows the covariate and coefficient effects to vary across entire distribution of child nutrition outcomes. This is particularly useful in providing specific insights into factors influencing rural-urban disparities at the lower tails of child HAZ score distributions. It also helps assess the importance of individual determinants and how they vary across the distribution of HAZ scores.

Results

There are no fundamental differences in the characteristics that determine child nutrition outcomes in urban and rural areas. Differences in the levels of a limited number of socio-economic characteristics – maternal education, spouse’s education and the wealth index (incorporating household asset ownership and access to drinking water and sanitation) contribute a major share of rural-urban disparities in the lowest quantiles of child nutrition outcomes. Differences in the strength of association between socio-economic characteristics and child nutrition outcomes account for less than a quarter of rural-urban disparities at the lower end of the HAZ score distribution.

Conclusions

Public health interventions aimed at overcoming rural-urban disparities in child nutrition outcomes need to focus principally on bridging gaps in socio-economic endowments of rural and urban households and improving the quality of rural infrastructure. Improving child nutrition outcomes in developing countries does not call for fundamentally different approaches to public health interventions in rural and urban areas.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Srinivasan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Van de Poel E, O'Donnell O, Van Doorslaer E: Are urban children really healthier? Evidence from 47 developing countries. Soc Sci Med 2007, 65(10):1986-2003.
• [2]Smith LC, Ruel MT, Ndiaye A: Why is child malnutrition lower in urban than in rural areas? Evidence from 36 developing countries. World Dev 2005, 33(8):1285-1305.
• [3]Von Braun J, McComb J, Fred-Mensah BK, Pandya-Lorch R: Urban food insecurity and malnutrition in developing countries: Trends, policies, and research implications. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute; 1993.
• [4]Menon P, Ruel MT, Morris SS: Socio-economic differentials in child stunting are consistently larger in urban than in rural areas. Food Nutr Bull 2001, 21(3):282-289.
• [5]Wang L: Determinants of child mortality in LDCs: Empirical findings from demographic and health surveys. Health Policy 2003, 65(3):277-299.
• [6]Sahn DE, Stifel DC: Urban–rural inequality in living standards in Africa. J African Econ 2003, 12(4):564-597.
• [7]Fotso JC: Urban–rural differentials in child malnutrition: trends and socioeconomic correlates in sub-Saharan Africa. Health Place 2007, 13(1):205-223.
• [8]Fotso JC: Child health inequities in developing countries: differences across urban and rural areas. Int J Equity Health 2006, 5:9. BioMed Central Full Text
• [9]Achrya LB, Cleland J: Maternal health services in rural Nepal: does access or quality matter more? Health Pol Plan 2000, 15:223-229.
• [10]Dhakal S, Chapman GN, Simkhada PP, Van Teijlingen ER, Stephens J, Raja AE: Utilisation of postnatal care among rural women in Nepal. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2007, 7(1):19. BioMed Central Full Text
• [11]Garrett JL, Ruel MT: Are determinants of rural and urban food security and nutritional status different? Some insights from Mozambique. World Dev 1999, 27(11):1955-1975.
• [12]Costa-Font J, Fabbri D, Gil J: Decomposing body mass index gaps between Mediterranean countries: A counterfactual quantile regression analysis. Econ Hum Biol 2008, 7(3):351-365.
• [13]O'Donnell O, Nicolás ÁL, Van Doorslaer E: Growing richer and taller: Explaining change in the distribution of child nutritional status during Vietnam's economic boom. J Dev Econ 2009, 88(1):45-58.
• [14]Dunn RA, Tan AK, Nayga RM: Obesity inequality in Malaysia: decomposing differences by gender and ethnicity using quantile regression. Ethn Health 2013, 17(5):493-511.
• [15]Etile F: Education policies and health inequalities: evidence from changes in the distribution of Body Mass Index in France, 1981–2003. Econ Hum Biol 2013.
• [16]World Bank: World Development Indicators. [http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators webcite]; 2012 (Accessed July 2012)
• [17]United Nations: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2011 revision. New York: United Nations: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division; 2012. [CD-ROM Edition] http://esa.un.org/unup/Documentation/cd-rom_order-info.htm webcite
• [18]World Health Organization: WHO Child Growth Standards: Methods and Development. Geneva: WHO; 2006.
• [19]Rutstein SO, Kiersten J: The DHS Wealth Index. Calverton, Maryland: ORC Macro; 2007. [DHS Comparative Reports No. 6]
• [20]Balarajan Y, Ramakrishnan U, Özaltin E, Shankar AH, Subramanian SV: Anaemia in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 2012, 378(9809):2123-2135.
• [21]Jones-Smith JC, Gordon-Larsen P, Siddiqi A, Popkin BM: Cross-national comparisons of time trends in overweight inequality by socioeconomic status among women using repeated cross-sectional surveys from 37 developing countries, 1989–2007. Am J Epidemiol 2011, 173(6):667-675.
• [22]Balarajan Y, Villamor E: Nationally representative surveys show recent increases in the prevalence of overweight and obesity among women of reproductive age in Bangladesh, Nepal, and India. J Nutr 2009, 139(11):2139-2144.
• [23]Lee V, Ahmed F, Wada S, Ahmed T, Ahmed AS, Parvin Banu C, Akhter N: Extent of vitamin A deficiency among rural pregnant women in Bangladesh. Public Health Nutr 2008, 11(12):1326.
• [24]Subramanian SV, Perkins JM, Özaltin E, Smith GD: Weight of nations: a socioeconomic analysis of women in low-to middle-income countries. Am J Clin Nutr 2011, 93(2):413-421.
• [25]Fortson JG: The gradient in sub-Saharan Africa: socioeconomic status and HIV/AIDS. Demography 2008, 45(2):303-322.
• [26]Kishor S, Johnson K: Reproductive health and domestic violence: are the poorest women uniquely disadvantaged? Demography 2006, 43(2):293-307.
• [27]Filmer D, Pritchett L: Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data – or tears: An application to educational enrolments in states of India. Demography 2001, 38(1):115-132.
• [28]UNICEF: Strategy for Improved Nutrition for Women and Children in Developing Countries. New York: UNICEF; 1990. [UNICEF Policy Review No.1]
• [29]Sastry N: What explains rural-urban differentials in child mortality in Brazil? Soc Sci Med 1997, 44(7):989-1002.
• [30]Oaxaca R: Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. Int Econ Rev 1973, 14(3):693-709.
• [31]Blinder AS: Wage discrimination: reduced form and structural estimates. J Hum Resour 1973, 8(4):436-455.
• [32]Koenker R, Hallock KF: Quantile Regression. J Econ Perspect 2001, 4:436-455.
• [33]Koenker R, Bassett G Jr: Regression quantiles. Econometrica 1978, 46(1):33-50.
• [34]Firpo S, Fortin NM, Lemieux T: Unconditional quantile regressions. Econometrica 2009, 77(3):953-973.
• [35]DiNardo J, Fortin NM, Lemieux T: Labor Market Institutions and the Distribution of Wages, 1973-1992: a semiparametric approach. Econometrica 1996, 64(5):1001-1044.
• [36]Firpo S, Fortin N, Lemieux T: Decomposing wage distributions using recentered influence function regressions. Working Paper, University of British Columbia; 2007.
• [37]Chi W, Li B: Glass ceiling or sticky floor? Examining the gender earnings differential across the earnings distribution in urban China, 1987–2004. J Comp Econ 2008, 36(2):243-263.
• [38]Asadullah MN, Chaudhury N: Reverse gender gap in schooling in Bangladesh: insights from urban and rural households. J Dev Studies 2009, 45(8):1360-1380.
• [39]Khandker S, Pitt M, Fuwa N: Subsidy to promote girls' secondary education: the female stipend program in Bangladesh. Washington DC: World Bank; 2003.
• [40]Spears D: Height and cognitive achievement among Indian children. Econ Hum Biol 2012, 10(2):210-219.
• [41]Rutstein SO: The DHS wealth index: approaches for rural and urban areas. Washington, DC: Macro International Inc; 2008. http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNADN521.pdf webcite