Comparing short versions of the AUDIT in a community-based survey of young people

BMC Public Health

Paul Dietze²  Margaret Hellard³  Maelenn Gouillou¹  Anna L Bowring¹ 

[1] Centre for Population Health, Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia;Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia;The Nossal Institute for Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

关键词: Adolescents;    Young adult;    Alcohol consumption;    AUDIT;    Alcohol use disorders identification test;    Alcohol screening;   

Others  :  1162380
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2458-13-301

 received in 2012-09-12, accepted in 2013-03-27,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

The 10-item Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT-10) is commonly used to monitor harmful alcohol consumption among high-risk groups, including young people. However, time and space constraints have generated interest for shortened versions. Commonly used variations are the AUDIT-C (three questions) and the Fast Alcohol Screening Test (FAST) (four questions), but their utility in screening young people in non-clinical settings has received little attention.

Methods

We examined the performance of established and novel shortened versions of the AUDIT in relation to the full AUDIT-10 in a community-based survey of young people (16–29 years) attending a music festival in Melbourne, Australia (January 2010).

Among those reporting drinking alcohol in the previous 12 months, the following statistics were systematically assessed for all possible combinations of three or four AUDIT items and established AUDIT variations: Cronbach’s alpha (internal consistency), variance explained (R²) and Pearson’s correlation coefficient (concurrent validity). For our purposes, novel shortened AUDIT versions considered were required to represent all three AUDIT domains and include item 9 on alcohol-related injury.

Results

We recruited 640 participants (68% female) reporting drinking in the previous 12 months. Median AUDIT-10 score was 10 in males and 9 in females, and 127 (20%) were classified as having at least high-level alcohol problems according to WHO classification.

The FAST scored consistently high across statistical measures; it explained 85.6% of variance in AUDIT-10, correlation with AUDIT-10 was 0.92, and Cronbach’s alpha was 0.66. A number of novel four-item AUDIT variations scored similarly high. Comparatively, the AUDIT-C scored substantially lower on all measures except internal consistency.

Conclusions

Numerous abbreviated variations of the AUDIT may be a suitable alternative to the AUDIT-10 for classifying high-level alcohol problems in a community-based population of young Australians. Four-item AUDIT variations scored more consistently high across all evaluated statistics compared to three-item combinations. Novel AUDIT versions may be more effective than many established shortened versions as an alternative screening tool to the AUDIT-10 to measure hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption in this population.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Bowring et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Livingston M, Room R: Variations by age and sex in alcohol-related problematic behaviour per drinking volume and heavier drinking occasion. Drug Alcohol Depen 2009, 101(3):169-175.
• [2]NHMRC: Australian Guidelines to Reduce Health Risks from Drinking Alcohol. Canberra: Department of Health and Ageing; 2009.
• [3]Bonomo YA, Bowes G, Coffey C, Carlin JB, Patton GC: Teenage drinking and the onset of alcohol dependence: a cohort study over seven years. Addiction 2004, 99:1520-1528.
• [4]Meyers P: Victorian Youth Alcohol and Drug Survey, 2009. Final Report. Commissioned by the Victorian Drug and Alcohol Prevention Council for the Department of Health. Melbourne: Social Research Centre; 2010.
• [5]Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, De La Fuente JR, Grant M: Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption-II. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1993, 88:791-804.
• [6]Babor T, Higgins-Biddle J, Saunders J, Monteiro M: The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Guidelines for use in primary care, 2nd edn. Geneva: World Health Organization, Department of Mental Health and Substance Dependence; 2001.
• [7]Aalto M, Alho H, Halme JT, Seppa K: AUDIT and its abbreviated versions in detecting heavy and binge drinking in a general population survey. Drug Alcohol Depend 2009, 103(1–2):25-29.
• [8]Rumpf H, Hapke U, Meyer C, John U: Screening for alcohol use disorders and at-risk drinking in the general population: psychometric performance of three questionnaires. Alcohol Alcohol 2002, 37(3):261.
• [9]Reinert DF, Allen JP: The alcohol use disorders identification test: an update of research findings. Alcohol Clin Exp Re 2007, 31(2):185-199.
• [10]Kriston L, Hölzel L, Weiser A-K, Berner MM, Härter M: Meta-analysis: Are 3 Questions Enough to Detect Unhealthy Alcohol Use? Ann Intern Med 2008, 149(12):879-888.
• [11]Gordon AJ, Maisto SA, McNeil M, Kraemer KL, Conigliaro RL, Kelley ME, Conigliaro J: Three questions can detect hazardous drinkers. J Fam Pract 2001, 50(4):313-320.
• [12]Gual A, Segura L, Contel M, Heather N, Colom J: Audit-3 and audit-4: effectiveness of two short forms of the alcohol use disorders identification test. Alcohol Alcohol 2002, 37(6):591-596.
• [13]Hodgson R, Alwyn T, John B, Thom B, Smith A: The FAST alcohol screening test. Alcohol Alcohol 2002, 37(1):61.
• [14]Bush K, Kivlahan DR, McDonell MB, Fihn SD, Bradley KA: The Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project: The AUDIT Alcohol Consumption Questions (AUDIT-C): An Effective Brief Screening Test for Problem Drinking. Arch Intern Med 1998, 158(16):1789-1795.
• [15]Aertgeerts B, Buntinx F, Ansoms S, Fevery J: Screening properties of questionnaires and laboratory tests for the detection of alcohol abuse or dependence in a general practice population. Br J Gen Pract 2001, 51(464):206-217.
• [16]Bradley KA, Bush KR, Epler AJ, Dobie DJ, Davis TM, Sporleder JL, Maynard C, Burman ML, Kivlahan DR: Two brief alcohol-screening tests From the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): validation in a female Veterans Affairs patient population. Arch Intern Med 2003, 163(7):821-829.
• [17]Meneses-Gaya C, Zuardi AW, Loureiro SR, Hallak JEC, Trzesniak C, De Azevedo Marques JM, Machado-de-Sousa JP, Chagas MHN, Souza RM, Crippa JAS: Is the Full Version of the AUDIT Really Necessary? Study of the Validity and Internal Construct of Its Abbreviated Versions. Alcohol Clin Exp Re 2010, 34(8):1417-1424.
• [18]Chung T, Colby SM, Barnett NP, Rohsenow DJ, Spirito A, Monti PM: Screening Adolescents for Problem Drinking: Performance of Brief Screens against DSM-IV Alcohol Diagnoses(*).(Statistical Data Included). J Stud Alcohol 2000, 61(4):579.
• [19]Dawson DA, Grant BF, Stinson FS, Zhou Y: Effectiveness of the Derived Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT-C) in Screening for Alcohol Use Disorders and Risk Drinking in the US General Population. Alcohol Clin Exp Re 2005, 29(5):844-854.
• [20]Bradley KA, DeBenedetti AF, Volk RJ, Williams EC, Frank D, Kivlahan DR: AUDIT-C as a Brief Screen for Alcohol Misuse in Primary Care. Alcohol Clin Exp Re 2007, 31(7):1208-1217.
• [21]Kelly TM, Donovan JE, Chung T, Bukstein OG, Cornelius JR: Brief screens for detecting alcohol use disorder among 18–20 year old young adults in emergency departments: Comparing AUDIT-C, CRAFFT, RAPS4-QF, FAST, RUFT-Cut, and DSM-IV 2-Item Scale. Addict Behav 2009, 34(8):668-674.
• [22]Aertgeerts B, Buntinx F, Bande-Knops J, Vanderrneulen C, Roelants M, Ansoms S, Fevery J: The Value of CAGE, CUGE, and AUDIT in Screening for Alcohol Abuse and Dependence Among College Freshmen. Alcohol Clin Exp Re 2000, 24(1):53-57.
• [23]Demartini K, Carey K: Correlates of AUDIT risk status for male and female college students. J Am Coll Health 2009, 58(3):233-239.
• [24]Fleming MF, Barry KL, Macdonald R: The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) in a College Sample. Subst Use Misuse 1991, 26(11):1173-1185.
• [25]Demartini KS, Carey KB: Optimizing the use of the AUDIT for alcohol screening in college students. Psychol Assess 2012, 24(4):954-963.
• [26]Dawson DA, Pulay AJ, Grant BF: A comparison of two single-item screeners for hazardous drinking and alcohol use disorder. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2010, 34(2):364-374.
• [27]Lim MSC, Hellard ME, Aitken CK, Hocking JS: Surveillance of STI risk behaviour among young people attending a music festival in Australia, 2005–08. Aust N Z J Public Health 2009, 33:482-484.
• [28]Lim MSC, Hellard ME, Hocking JS, Spelman TD, Aitken CK: Surveillance of drug use among young people attending a music festival in Australia, 2005–2008. Drug Alcohol Rev 2010, 29(2):150-156.
• [29]Lim MSC, Hellard ME, Aitken CK, Hocking JS: Sexual-risk behaviour, self-perceived risk and knowledge of sexually transmissible infections among young Australians attending a music festival. Sex Health 2007, 4(1):51-56.
• [30]Patrick D, Andrew M: Safe, familiar but big crowd still enjoys rocking day out. 1st edition. Melbourne, Australia: The Age; 2010:5.
• [31]Bowring AL, Gold J, Dietze P, Gouillou M, Van Gemert C, Hellard ME: Know your limits: Awareness of the 2009 Australian alcohol guidelines among young people. Drug Alcohol Rev 2012, 31(2):213-223.
• [32]StataCorp: Stata Statistical Software: Release 11. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2009.
• [33]Chikritzhs TN, Pascal R: Trends in Youth Alcohol Consumption and Related Harms in Australian Jurisdictions, 1990–2002. Perth, Australia: National Drug Research Institute; 2004. [National Alcohol Indicators: Bulletin No 6]
• [34]Australian Bureau of Statistics: Australian Standard Geographical Classification (ASGC) Remoteness Areas (cat. no. 1216.0). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2006.
• [35]Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ 1997, 314(7080):572.
• [36]Allen J: Assessing Alcohol Problems: A Guide for Clinicians and Researchers. In. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; 1995.
• [37]McCambridge J, Thomas BA: Short forms of the AUDIT in a Web-based study of young drinkers. Drug Alcohol Rev 2009, 28(1):18-24.
• [38]Mundt MP, Zakletskaia LI: Brown DD. Fleming MF: Alcohol-induced memory blackouts as an indicator of injury risk among college drinkers. Inj Prev; 2011.
• [39]Lim MSC, Aitken C, Hocking J, Hellard M: Discrepancies between young people’s self-reported sexual experience and their perceptions of ‘normality’. Sex Health 2009, 6(2):171-172.
• [40]Lim MSC, Hellard ME, Hocking JS, Aitken CK: A cross-sectional survey of young people attending a music festival: associations between drug use and musical preference. Drug Alcohol Rev 2008, 27(4):439-441.