期刊论文详细信息
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
“Expectant Parents”: Study protocol of a longitudinal study concerning prenatal (risk) factors and postnatal infant development, parenting, and parent-infant relationships
Hedwig JA van Bakel1  Catharina HAM Rijk2  Evi SA de Cock2  Charlotte MJM Vreeswijk2  A Janneke BM Maas2 
[1]Centre of Infant Mental Health, Dimence, Deventer, the Netherlands
[2]Department of Developmental Psychology, Tilburg University, Room P-704, P.O. Box 90153, 5000, Tilburg, the Netherlands
关键词: Infant;    Representations;    Risk factors;    Pregnancy;    Father;    Mother;    Bonding;    Attachment;   
Others  :  1152829
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2393-12-46
 received in 2012-03-28, accepted in 2012-05-23,  发布年份 2012
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

While the importance of the infant-parent relationship from the child’s perspective is acknowledged worldwide, there is still a lack of knowledge about predictors and long-term benefits or consequences of the quality of parent-infant relationships from the parent’s perspective. The purpose of this prospective study is to investigate the quality of parent-infant relationships from parents’ perspectives, both in the prenatal and postpartum period. This study therefore focuses on prenatal (risk) factors that may influence the quality of pre- and postnatal bonding, the transition to parenthood, and bonding as a process within families with young children. In contrast to most research concerning pregnancy and infant development, not only the roles and experiences of mothers during pregnancy and the first two years of infants’ lives are studied, but also those of fathers.

Methods/design

The present study is a prospective longitudinal cohort study, in which pregnant women (N = 466) and their partners (N = 319) are followed from 15 weeks gestation until their child is 24 months old. During pregnancy, midwives register the presence of prenatal risk factors and provide obstetric information after the child’s birth. Parental characteristics are investigated using self-report questionnaires at 15, 26, and 36 weeks gestational age and at 4, 6, 12, and 24 months postpartum. At 26 weeks of pregnancy and at 6 months postpartum, parents are interviewed concerning their representations of the (unborn) child. At 6 months postpartum, the mother-child interaction is observed in several situations within the home setting. When children are 4, 6, 12, and 24 months old, parents also completed questionnaires concerning the child’s (social-emotional) development and the parent-child relationship. Additionally, at 12 months information about the child’s physical development and well-being during the first year of life is retrieved from National Health Care Centres.

Discussion

The results of this study may contribute to early identification of families at risk for adverse parent-infant relationships, infant development, or parenting. Thereby this study will be relevant for the development of policy, practice, and theory concerning infant mental health.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Maas et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150406232635957.pdf 418KB PDF download
Figure 3. 141KB Image download
Figure 2. 97KB Image download
Figure 1. 26KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]DeKleyn M, Greenberg MT: Attachment and psychopathology in childhood. 2nd edition. Edited by Cassidy J, Shaver PR. Guilford Press, New York; 2008:637-665. [Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications]
  • [2]Lyons-Ruth K, Jacobvitz D: Attachment disorganization: Genetic factors, parenting contexts, and developmental transformation from infancy to adulthood. 2nd edition. Edited by Cassidy J, Shaver PR. Guilford Press, New York; 2008:666-697. [Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications]
  • [3]Rees CA: Thinking about children’s attachments. Arch Dis Child 2005, 90(10):1058-1065.
  • [4]Sroufe LA: Attachment and development: A prospective, longitudinal study from birth to adulthood. Attachment Hum Dev 2005, 7(4):349-367.
  • [5]Sroufe LA, Egeland B, Carlson EA, Collins WA: The development of the person: The Minnesota Study of Risk and Adaptation From Birth to Adulthood. Guilford Press, New York; 2005.
  • [6]Weinfield NS, Sroufe A, Egeland B, Carlson E: Individual differences in infant- caregiver attachment: Conceptual and empirical aspects of security. 2nd edition. Edited by Cassidy J, Shaver PR. Guilford Press, New York; 2008:78-101. [Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications]
  • [7]Thompson RA: Early attachment and later development: Familiar questions, new answers. 2nd edition. Edited by Cassidy J, Shaver PR. Guilford Press, New York; 2008:348-365. [Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications]
  • [8]Barlow J, Svanberg PO: Keeping the baby in mind: Infant mental health in practice. Edited by Barlow J, Svanberg PO. Taylor & Francis Group, New York; 2009:1-14. [Keeping the baby in mind]
  • [9]Brandon A, Pitts S, Denton W, Stringer A, Evans H: A History of the Theory of Prenatal Attachment. J Prenat Perinat Psychol Health 2009, 23(4):201-222.
  • [10]Raphael-Leff J: Psychological Processes of Childbearing. The Anna Freud Centre, London; 2005.
  • [11]Condon JT, Corkindale C: The correlates of antenatal attachment in pregnant women. Br J Med Psychol 1997, 70(4):359-372.
  • [12]Condon JT: The assessment of antenatal emotional attachment: Development of a questionnaire instrument. Br J Med Psychol 1993, 66(2):167-183.
  • [13]Cranley MS: Development of a tool for the measurement of maternal attachment during pregnancy. Nurs Res 1981, 30(5):281-284.
  • [14]Benoit D, Parker KCH, Zeanah CH: Mothers' Representations of Their Infants Assessed Prenatally: Stability and Association with Infants' Attachment Classifications. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1997, 38(3):307-313.
  • [15]Müller ME: Prenatal and Postnatal Attachment: A Modest Correlation. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1996, 25(2):161-166.
  • [16]Siddiqui A, Hägglöf B: Does maternal prenatal attachment predict postnatal mother–infant interaction? Early Hum Dev 2000, 59(1):13-25.
  • [17]Theran SA, Levendosky AA, Bogat AG, Huth-Bocks AC: Stability and change in mothers' internal representations of their infants over time. Attachment Hum Dev 2005, 7(3):253-268.
  • [18]Ainsworth MS, Bowlby J: An ethological approach to personality development. Am Psychol 1991, 46(4):333-341.
  • [19]Bretherton I: The origins of attachment theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth. Dev Psychol 1992, 28(5):759-775.
  • [20]Zeanah CH, Smyke AT: Attachment Disorders. 3rd edition. Edited by Zeanah CH. Guilford Press, New York; 2009. [Handbook of Infant Mental Health]
  • [21]Dayton CJ, Levendosky AA, Davidson WS, Bogat GA: The child as held in the mind of the mother: The influence of prenatal maternal representations on parenting behaviors. Infant Ment Health J 2010, 31(2):220-241.
  • [22]Bruschweiler-Stern N: The Neonatal Moment of Meeting—Building the Dialogue, Strengthening the Bond. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin North Am 2009, 18(3):533-544.
  • [23]Benoit D: Infant-parent attachment: Definition, types, antecedents, measurement and outcome. Paediatr Child Health 2004, 9(8):541.
  • [24]Nicol-Harper R, Harvey AG, Stein A: Interactions between mothers and infants: Impact of maternal anxiety. Infant Behav Dev 2007, 30(1):161-167.
  • [25]Reck C, Hunt A, Fuchs T, Weiss R, Noon A, Moehler E, Downing G, Tronick EZ, Mundt C: Interactive regulation of affect in postpartum depressed mothers and their infants: an overview. Psychopathology 2004, 37(6):272-280.
  • [26]Singer LT, Fulton S, Davillier M, Koshy D, Salvator A, Baley JE: Effects of Infant Risk Status and Maternal Psychological Distress on Maternal-Infant Interactions During the First Year of Life. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2003, 24(4):233-241.
  • [27]Zeitlin D, Dhanjal T, Colmsee M: Maternal-foetal bonding: the impact of domestic violence on the bonding process between a mother and child. Arch Wom Ment Health 1999, 2(4):183-189.
  • [28]Brockington IF, Aucamp HM, Fraser C: Severe disorders of the mother–infant relationship: definitions and frequency. Arch Wom Ment Health 2006, 9(5):243-251.
  • [29]Wilson LM, Reid AJ, Midmer DK, Biringer A, Carroll JC, Stewart DE: Antenatal psychosocial risk factors associated with adverse postpartum family outcomes. CMAJ Can Med Assoc J 1996, 154(6):785.
  • [30]Davis EP, Snidman N, Wadhwa PD, Glynn LM, Schetter CD, Sandman CA: Prenatal Maternal Anxiety and Depression Predict Negative Behavioral Reactivity in Infancy. Infancy 2004, 6(3):319-331.
  • [31]Muir RC, Monaghan SM, Gilmore RJ, Clarkson JE, Crooks TJ, Egan TG: Predicting child abuse and neglect in New Zealand. Australas Psychiatr 1989, 23(2):255-260.
  • [32]Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R: Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatr Journal Ment Sci 1987, 150:782-786.
  • [33]Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE: Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA; 1970.
  • [34]Arrindell WA, Ettema JHM: SCL-90 Symptom checklist: Handleiding bij een multidimensionele psychopathologie-indicator [SCL-90 Symptom checklist: Manual to a multidimensional psychopathology indicator]. Swets Test Publishers, Lisse; 2003.
  • [35]Denollet J, Strik JJ, Lousberg R, Honig A: Recognizing increased risk of depressive comorbidity after myocardial infarction: Looking for 4 symptoms of anxiety-depression. Psychother Psychosom 2006, 75(6):346-352.
  • [36]Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R: A global measure of perceived stress. J Heal Soc Behav 1983, 24(4):385-396.
  • [37]Vermulst AA, Gerris JRM: Quick Big Five persoonlijkheidstest [The Quick Big Five personality test]. LDC Publishers, Leeuwarden, NL; 2005.
  • [38]Denollet J: DS14: Standard assessment of negative affectivity, social inhibition, and Type D personality. Psychosom Med 2005, 67(1):89-97.
  • [39]Block J, Kremen AM: IQ and ego-resiliency: Conceptual and empirical connections and separateness. J Personal Soc Psychol 1996, 70(2):349-361.
  • [40]Holmes BM, Lyons-Ruth K: The relationship questionnaire-clinical version (RQ- CV): Introducing a profoundly-distrustful attachment style. Infant Ment Health J 2006, 27(3):310-325.
  • [41]Koot HM: Handleiding bij de Vragenlijst voor Gezinsproblemen [Manual Questionnaire on Family Problems]. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Sophia Children`s Hospital, Rotterdam; 1997.
  • [42]Raphael-Leff J: Facilitators and regulators: two approaches to mothering. Br J Med Psychol 1983, 56(4):379-390.
  • [43]Bricker D, Squires J, Mounts L: Ages and Stages Questionnaire: A parent- completed, child-monitoring system. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD; 1995.
  • [44]Squires J, Bricker D, Twombly E: Ages & Stages Questionnaires-Social- Emotional: A parent-completed, child-monitoring system for social-emotional behaviors. Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Inc, Baltimore; 2002.
  • [45]Bates JE, Freeland CA, Lounsbury ML: Measurement of infant difficultness. Child Dev 1979, 50(3):794-803.
  • [46]Carter AS, Briggs-Gowan MJ: Manual of the Infant-Toddler Social-Emotional Assessment. Yale University, New Haven, CT; 2000.
  • [47]Briggs-Gowan MJ, Carter AS: Brief Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA) mannual, version 2.0. Yale University, New Haven, CT; 2002.
  • [48]Gartstein MA, Rothbart MK: Studying infant temperament via the Revised Infant Behavior Questionnaire. Infant Behav Dev 2003, 26(1):64-86.
  • [49]Putnam SP, Gartstein MA, Rothbart MK: Measurement of fine-grained aspects of toddler temperament: The early childhood behavior questionnaire. Infant Behav Dev 2006, 29(3):386-401.
  • [50]Gioia GA, Espy KA, Isquith PK: Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Preschool Version (BRIEF-P). Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL; 2002.
  • [51]Zeanah CH, Benoit D, Barton ML, Hirshberg L: Working model of the child interview coding manual. 1996. Unpublished manuscript
  • [52]Van Bakel HJA, Vreeswijk CMJM, Maas AJBM: Pictorial and verbal representations of prenatal attachment [abstract]. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2009, 27:323.
  • [53]NICHD, Early Child Care Research Network: Child Care and Mother-Child Interaction in the First 3 Years of Life. Dev Psychol 1999, 35(6):1399-1413.
  • [54]Condon JT, Corkindale CJ: The assessment of parent-to-infant attachment: Development of a self-report questionnaire instrument. J Reprod Infant Psychol 1998, 16(1):57-76.
  • [55]Condon JT, Corkindale CJ, Boyce P: Assessment of postnatal paternal-infant attachment: development of a questionnaire instrument. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2008, 26(3):195-210.
  • [56]Brockington IF, Oates J, George S, Turner D, Vostanis P, Sullivan M, Loh C, Murdoch C: A Screening Questionnaire for mother-infant bonding disorders. Arch Wom Ment Health 2001, 3(4):133-140.
  • [57]Stams GJJM, Hoeve M, Asscher JJ, Colonnesi C, Noom MJ, Polderman N, Kellaert-Knol M: Validation of the Attachment Difficulties Screening Inventory 2–5 YearsSubmitted for publication. 2011.
  • [58]de Brock AJLL, Vermulst AA, Gerris JRM, Abidin RR: NOSI. Nijmeegse Ouderlijke Stress Index. Handleiding experimentele versie. Swets en Zeitlinger, Lisse; 1992.
  • [59]Barnes CR, Adamson-Macedo EN: Perceived Maternal Parenting Self-Efficacy (PMP S-E) tool: development and validation with mothers of hospitalized preterm neonates. J Adv Nurs 2007, 60(5):550-560.
  • [60]Baron RM, Kenny DA: The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Personal Soc Psychol 1986, 51(6):1173.
  • [61]Cohen J: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale; 1988.
  • [62]Gatsonis C, Sampson AR: Multiple correlation: Exact power and sample size calculations. Psychol Bull 1989, 106(3):516.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:23次 浏览次数:23次