Pain relief in labour: a qualitative study to determine how to support women to make decisions about pain relief in labour

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Catherine Exley¹  Sheila MacPhail²  Richard G Thomson¹  Joanne E Lally¹ 

[1]Institute of Health and Society, Baddiley Clark Building, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, United Kingdom

[2]Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Hospitals Trust, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, United Kingdom

关键词: Risk communication;    Antenatal education;    Shared decision making;    Pain relief;   

Others  :  1131835
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2393-14-6

 received in 2013-02-20, accepted in 2013-12-16,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Engagement in decision making is a key priority of modern healthcare. Women are encouraged to make decisions about pain relief in labour in the ante-natal period based upon their expectations of what labour pain will be like. Many women find this planning difficult. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore how women can be better supported in preparing for, and making, decisions during pregnancy and labour regarding pain management.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 primiparous and 10 multiparous women at 36 weeks of pregnancy and again within six weeks postnatally. Data collection and analysis occurred concurrently to identify key themes.

Results

Three main themes emerged from the data. Firstly, during pregnancy women expressed a degree of uncertainty about the level of pain they would experience in labour and the effect of different methods of pain relief. Secondly, women reflected on how decisions had been made regarding pain management in labour and the degree to which they had felt comfortable making these decisions. Finally, women discussed their perceived levels of control, both desired and experienced, over both their bodies and the decisions they were making.

Conclusion

This study suggests that the current approach of antenatal preparation in the NHS, of asking women to make decisions antenatally for pain relief in labour, needs reviewing. It would be more beneficial to concentrate efforts on better informing women and on engaging them in discussions around their values, expectations and preferences and how these affect each specific choice rather than expecting them to make to make firm decisions in advance of such an unpredictable event as labour.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Lally et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Department of Health: National Inpatient Survey. 2011. http://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/media/documents/ip11_national_tables_final.pdf webcite
• [2]The foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making. http://www.fimdm.org/about.php webcite
• [3]Department of Health: NHS Constitution. London: Department of Health; 2010.
• [4]Janzen JA, Silvius J, Jacobs S, Slaughter S, Dalziel W, Drummond N: What is a health expectation? Developing a pragmatic conceptual model from psychological theory. Health Expectations 2006, 9:37-48.
• [5]O'Connor AM: Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making 1995, 15:25-30.
• [6]Green JM: Expectations and experiences of pain in labour: Findings from a large prospective study. Birth 1993, 20(2):65-72.
• [7]Leung KK, Silvius JL, Pimlott N, Dalziel W, Drummond N: Why health expectations and hopes are different: the development of a conceptual model. Health Expectations 2009, 12:347-360.
• [8]Kravitz RL, Callahan EJ, Paterniti D, Antonius D, Dunham M, Lewis CE: Prevalence and sources of patients’ unmet expectations for care. Annals of Internal Medicine 1996, 125(9):730-737.
• [9]Thompson AGH, Sunol R: Expectations as determinants of patient satisfaction: Concepts, Theory and Evidence. International Journal of Quality in HealthCare 1994, 7(2):127-141.
• [10]Lally JE, Murtagh MJ, Macphail S, Thomson RG: More in hope than expectation: a systematic review of women's expectations and experience of pain relief in labour. BMC Medicine 2008., 6(7)
• [11]Roberts C, Raynes-Greenow C, Nassar N, Trevena L, McCaffery K: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for the management of pain in labour and childbirth [ISRCTN52287533]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2004, 4(1):24. BioMed Central Full Text
• [12]Lothian JA: Choice, Autonomy, and childbirth education. Journal of Perinatal Education 2008, 17:35-38.
• [13]Gupton A, Beaton J, Sloan J, Bramadat I: The development of a scale to measure childbirth expectations. The Canadian Journal of Nursing Research 1991, 23:35-47.
• [14]Waldenstrom U, Borg IM, Olsson B, Skold M: The childbirth experience: a study of 295 new mothers. Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care 1996, 23(3):144-153.
• [15]Kitzinger S: Birth your way: Choosing birth at home or in a birth centre. Chester le Street: Fresh Heart Publishing; 2011.
• [16]Lundgren I, Dahlberg K: Women's experience of pain during childbirth. Midwifery 1998, 14(2):105-110.
• [17]Leap N: Being with women in pain: do midwives need to rethink their role. British Journal of Midwifery 1997, 5(5):263.
• [18]Leeman L, Fontaine P, King V, Klein MC, Ratcliffe S: The nature and management of labor pain: part I. Non-pharmacologic pain relief.[erratum appears in American Family Physician. 2003 Dec 15;68(12):2330]. Am Fam Physician 2003, 68(6):1109-1112.
• [19]Peach MJ: The King Edward Memorial Hospital 1000 mother survey of methods of pain relief in labour. Anaesthesia & Intensive Care 1991, 19(3):393-399.
• [20]Sadler LC, Davison T, McCowan LME: Maternal satisfaction with active management of labor: a randomized controlled trial. Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care 2001, 28(4):225-235.
• [21]Maclean J: Pain Psychology. In Health Psychology in Context. Edited by Gilmartin J. Chichester: Wiley; 2009.
• [22]Rooks JP: Labor Pain Management Other Than Neuraxial: what do we know and where do we go next? Birth 2012, 39(4):318-322.
• [23]Baum F: Researching public health: behind the qualitative-quantitative methodological debate. Social Science and Medicine 1995, 40(4):459-468.
• [24]Ritchie J, Lewis J, Elan G: Designing and selecting samples. In Qualitative Research Practice. Edited by Ritchie J, Lewis J. London: Sage Publications; 2003:78-81.
• [25]Green JM, Coupland VA, Kitzinger JV: Expectations, experiences, and psychological outcomes of childbirth: a prospective study of 825 women. Birth 1990, 17(1):15-24.
• [26]Green JM, Coupland VA, Kitzinger JV: Great Expectations: A prospective study of womens expectations and experiences of childbirth. Cheshire: Books for Midwives Press; 1998.
• [27]Escott D, Spiby H, Slade P, Fraser RB: The range of coping strategies women use to manage pain and anxiety prior to and during first experience of labour. Midwifery 2004, 20(2):144-156.
• [28]Gibbins J, Thomson AM: Women’s expectations and experiences of childbirth. Midwifery 2001, 17(4):302-313.
• [29]Yearby M: Pain in childbearing: Key issues in management. Bailliere Tindall: Edinburgh; 2000.
• [30]VandeVusse A, VandeVusse L: Reality Television as a Source of information about birth: the messages and their implications. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health 2008, 53(5):482.
• [31]Simkin PT: Birth Plans: After 25 Years, Women Still Want To Be Heard. Birth 2007, 34(1):49-51.
• [32]Brown SJ, Lumley J: Communication and decision-making in labour: do birth plans make a difference? Health Expectations 1998, 1(2):106-116.
• [33]Hodnett E: Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2002, 186(5):S160-S172.
• [34]Fox B, Worts D: Revisiting the critique of medicalized childbirth: a contribution to the sociology of birth. Gender and Society 1999, 13(3):234-246.
• [35]Green JM, Baston HA: Feeling in control during labor: concepts, correlates, and consequences. Birth 2003, 30(4):235-247.
• [36]Mander R: The control of pain in labour. Journal of Clinical Nursing 1992, 1(4):219-223.
• [37]Niven C, Gijsbers K: Obstetric and non-obstetric factors related to labour pain. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 1984, 2(2):61-78.
• [38]National Institute for Clinical Excellence: Guideline 62: Antenatal Care In. London: NICE; 2008.
• [39]Leap N, Anderson T: The role of pain in normal birth and the empowerment of women. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2004.
• [40]Ross-Davie M, Munro J, Jokinen M: Supporting women in labour. In Evidence Based Guidelines for Midwifery-Led Care in Labour. London: Royal College of Midwives; 2012.
• [41]Royal College of Obstetricians and G: Antenatal Care: Routine care for healthy pregnant women. London: Commissioned by NICE; 2008.
• [42]Jacoby A: Mothers’ views about information and advice in pregnancy and childbirth: findings from a national study. Midwifery 1988, 4(3):103-110.
• [43]Soltani H: Exploring women’s views on information provided during pregnancy. British Journal of Midwifery 2005, 13(10):633-636.
• [44]Elwyn G, Frosch D, Volandes AE, Edwards A, Montori VM: Investing in deliberation: a definition and classification of decision support interventions for people facing difficult health decisions. Medical Decision Making 2010, 30(6):701-711.
• [45]Coulter A: Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making. Journal of Health Services Research Policy 1997, 2(2):112-121.
• [46]Right Care SDM Programme: Measuring shared decision making: a review of the research evidence. Cambridge: Department of Health; 2012.
• [47]Stapleton H, Thomas G: Informed choice and decision making. In Informed choice in maternity care. Edited by Kirkham M. Basingstoke: Palgrave: Macmillan; 2001.
• [48]Raynes-Greenow CH, Nassar N, Torvaldsen S, Trevena L, Roberts CL: Assisting informed decision making for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial of a decision aid for labour analgesia versus a pamphlet. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2010., 10(15)
• [49]Bekker HL, Legare F, Stacey D, O’Connor A, Lemyre L: Is anxiety a suitable measure of decision aid effectiveness: a systematic review? Patient Education and Counseling 2003, 50(3):255-262.
• [50]Mander R: Choosing the choices in the USA: examples in the maternity area. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1997, 25:1192-1197.
• [51]Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D: Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. In Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Volume 8. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2013.
• [52]Ottawa Decision Support Framework. http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/ODSF.pdf webcite
• [53]Hallowell N, Lawton J, Gregory S: Reflections on Research: The realities of doing research in the social sciences. Maidenhead, England: Open Univiersity Press; 2005.