BMC Health Services Research | |
Social acceptance and population confidence in telehealth in Quebec | |
Renald Lemieux1  Suzanne K Bédard2  Christian A Bellemare2  Thomas G Poder2  | |
[1] DSQ, MSSS, Montréal, QC, Canada;UETMIS and CRCHUS, CHUS Hôtel-Dieu, 580 rue Bowen Sud, Sherbrooke, J1G 2E8, QC, Canada | |
关键词: Quebec; Population; Confidence; Social acceptance; Telehealth; | |
Others : 1128652 DOI : 10.1186/s12913-015-0727-1 |
|
received in 2014-09-10, accepted in 2015-02-04, 发布年份 2015 | |
【 摘 要 】
Background
Access to healthcare in remote areas is difficult and telehealth could be a promising avenue if accepted by the population. The aim of this study is to assess social acceptance and population confidence in telehealth in the Province of Quebec.
Methods
We conducted a survey using a questionnaire assessing the social acceptance of and confidence level in telehealth. Two strategies were used: 1) paper questionnaires were sent to two hospitals in Quebec; and 2) online questionnaires were randomly sent by a firm specialized in online survey to a representative sample of the population of the Province of Quebec. Respondents were all residents of the Province of Quebec and 18 years and older. Questions were scored with a four-level Likert scale.
Results
A total of 1816 questionnaires were analyzed (229 written and 1,587 online questionnaires). The socio-demographic variables in our samples, especially the online questionnaires, were fairly representative of Quebec’s population. Overall, social acceptance scored at 77.71% and confidence level at 65.76%. Both scores were higher in the case of treatment (3 scenarios were proposed) vs. diagnosis (p < 0.05). No difference was found when respondents were asked to respond for themselves and for a member of their family, which demonstrates a true interest in telehealth in Quebec. In addition, we found a significant difference (p < 0.05) between written and online questionnaires regarding social acceptance (80.75% vs. 77.33%) and confidence level (74.84% vs. 64.55%). These differences may be due to social desirability or avidity bias in the written questionnaires.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that the population in Quebec encourages the development of telehealth for real time diagnosis and long distance treatment for regions deprived of healthcare professionals.
【 授权许可】
2015 Poder et al.; licensee BioMed Central.
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
20150225030710567.pdf | 383KB | download |
【 参考文献 】
- [1]Davis P, Howard R, Brockway P: An evaluation of telehealth in the provision of rheumatologic consults to a remote area. J Rheumatol 2001, 28(8):1910-3.
- [2]Hilty DM, Marks SL, Urness D, Yellowlees PM, Nesbitt TS: Clinical and educational telepsychiatry applications: a review. Can J Psychiatry 2004, 49:12-23.
- [3]Jennett PA, Affleck Hall L, Hailey D, Ohinmaa A, Anderson C, Thomas R, et al.: The socio-economic impact of telehealth: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 2003, 9:311-20.
- [4]Popely D: Telemedicine delivers healthy medical and financial benefits to ICUs. Healthc Exec 2009, 24(5):22-4.
- [5]Wade VA, Karnon J, Elshaug AG, Hiller JE: A systematic review of economic analyses of telehealth services using real time video communication. BMC Health Serv Res 2010, 10:233. BioMed Central Full Text
- [6]Currell R, Urquhart C, Wainwright P, Lewis R: Telemedicine versus face to face patient care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000, 2:CD002098.
- [7]Boulanger B, Kearney P, Ochoa J, Tsuei B, Sands F: Telemedicine: a solution to the followup of rural trauma patients? J Am Coll Surg 2001, 192:447-52.
- [8]Cabrera MF, Arredondo MT, Quiroga J: Integration of telemedicine into emergency medical services. J Telemed Telecare 2002, 8(Suppl 2):12-4.
- [9]Ong CA: Telemedicine and wound care. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008, 131:211-25.
- [10]Latifi R, Hadeed GJ, Rhee P, O’Keeffe T, Friese RS, Wynne JL, et al.: Initial experiences and outcomes of telepresence in the management of trauma and emergency surgical patients. Am J Surg 2009, 198(6):905-10.
- [11]Ward M, Ullrich F, Mueller K: Extent of telehealth use in rural and urban hospitals. Rural Pol Brief 2014, 4:1-4.
- [12]American Telemedicine Association. What is Telemedicine? [http://www.americantelemed.org/about-telemedicine/what-is-telemedicine]
- [13]Newfoundland & Labrador Centre for Health Information. What is Telehealth? [http://www.nlchi.nl.ca/index.php/what-is-telehealth]
- [14]Somat A: Acceptabilité, acceptabilité sociale des systèmes technologiques : ingénierie de la notion d’usage. Conférence des sciences de l’éducation, Université Pierre-Mendès-France, Grenoble; 2008.
- [15]LaFramboise LM, Woster J, Yager A, Yates BC: A technological life buoy, patient perceptions of the health buddy. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2009, 24(3):216-24.
- [16]Shore JH, Brooks E, Savin D, Orton H, Grigsby J, Manson SM: Acceptance of Telepsychiatry in American Indians. Telemed J E Health 2008, 14(5):461-6.
- [17]Yu C, Yang JJ, Chen JC, Liu CS, Chen CC, Lin ML, et al.: The development and evaluation of the citizen telehealth care service system: case study in Taipei. 31st annual international conference of the IEEE EMBS. IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; 2009.
- [18]Edwards L, Thomas C, Gregory A, Yardley L, O’Cathain A, Montgomery AA, et al.: Are people with chronic diseases interested in using telehealth? a cross-sectional postal survey. J Med Internet Res 2014, 16(5):e123.
- [19]Vodicka E, Mejilla R, Leveille SG, Ralston JD, Darer JD, Delbanco T, et al.: Online access to doctors’ notes: patient concerns about privacy. J Med Internet Res 2013, 15(9):e208.
- [20]Beck U: La Société du risque - Sur la voie d’une autre modernité. Flammarion, collection Champs, Paris; 2003.
- [21]Lemieux R, Michaud F, Masson P, Bellemare C, Martin M, Bernard MÈ, et al.: Robotized camera system for real-time coaching of clinicians in emergency room. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2008, 3(3–4):241-8.
- [22]Joinson A: Social desirability, anonymity, and Internet-based questionnaires. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 1999, 31(3):433-8.
- [23]Crowne D, Marlowe D: A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. J Consult Psychol 1960, 24(4):349-54.