BMC Public Health | |
Work ability assessment in a worker population: comparison and determinants of Work Ability Index and Work Ability score | |
Philippe Mairiaux1  Sophie Couffignal4  Marie Lise Lair4  Nicole Majery2  Valery Bocquet3  Mehdi El Fassi4  | |
[1] Public Health Department, Liège University, Liège, Belgium;Service de Santé au Travail Multisectoriel (STM), Strassen, GD, Luxembourg;Centre for Health Studies (CRP Santé), Competences Centre for Methodology and Statistics, Strassen, GD, Luxembourg;Centre for Health Studies (CRP Santé), Strassen, GD, Luxembourg | |
关键词: Work ability; Perceived health; Occupational health; Health surveillance; Ageing workers; | |
Others : 1162376 DOI : 10.1186/1471-2458-13-305 |
|
received in 2012-05-25, accepted in 2013-03-25, 发布年份 2013 | |
【 摘 要 】
Background
Public authorities in European countries are paying increasing attention to the promotion of work ability throughout working life and the best method to monitor work ability in populations of workers is becoming a significant question. The present study aims to compare the assessment of work ability based on the use of the Work Ability Index (WAI), a 7-item questionnaire, with another one based on the use of WAI’s first item, which consists in the worker’s self-assessment of his/her current work ability level as opposed to his/her lifetime best, this single question being termed “Work Ability score” (WAS).
Methods
Using a database created by an occupational health service, the study intends to answer the following questions: could the assessment of work ability be based on a single-item measure and which are the variables significantly associated with self-reported work ability among those systematically recorded by the occupational physician during health examinations? A logistic regression model was used in order to estimate the probability of observing “poor” or “moderate” WAI levels depending on age, gender, body mass index, smoking status, position held, firm size and diseases reported by the worker in a population of workers aged 40 to 65 and examined between January 2006 and June 2010 (n=12389).
Results
The convergent validity between WAS and WAI was statistically significant (rs=0.63). In the multivariable model, age (p<0.001), reported diseases (OR=1.13, 95%CI [1.11-1.15]) and holding a position mostly characterized by physical activity (OR=1.67, 95%CI [1.49-1.87]) increased the probability of reporting moderate or poor work ability. A work position characterized by the predominance of mental activity (OR=0.71, 95%CI [0.61-0.84]) had a favourable impact on work ability. These relations were observed regardless of the work ability measurement tool used.
Conclusion
The convergent validity and the similarity in results between WAI and WAS observed in a large population of employed workers should thus foster the use of WAS for systematic screening of work ability. Ageing, overweight, decline in health status, holding a mostly physical job and working in a large-sized firm increase the risk of presenting moderate or poor work ability.
【 授权许可】
2013 El Fassi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
20150413063449854.pdf | 206KB | download |
【 参考文献 】
- [1]Ilmarinen J: The work ability index (WAI). Occup Med 2007, 57:160.
- [2]van den Berg TI, Elders LA, de Zwart BC, Burdorf A: The effects of work-related and individual factors on the Work Ability Index: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med 2009, 66:211-220.
- [3]Burdorf A, Frings-Dresen MH, van Duivenbooden C, Elders LA: Development of a decision model to identify workers at risk of long-term disability in the construction industry. Scand J Work Environ Health 2005, 31(Suppl 2):31-36.
- [4]Kujala V, Tammelin T, Remes J, Vammavaara E, Ek E, Laitinen J: Work ability index of young employees and their sickness absence during the following year. Scand J Work Environ Health 2006 Feb, 32:75-84.
- [5]Alavinia SM, de Boer AGEM, van Duivenbooden JC, Frings-Dresen MH, Burdorf A: Determinants of work ability and its predictive value for disability. Occup Med 2009, 59:32-37.
- [6]Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Seitsamo J, Huuhtanen P, Martikainen R, Nygård CH: Summary of the Finnish research project (1981–1992) to promote the health and work ability of aging workers. Scand J Work Environ Health 1997, 23(suppl 1):66-71.
- [7]Salonen P, Arola H, Nygård CH, Huhtala H, Koivisto AM: Factors associated with premature departure from working life among ageing food industry employees. Occup Med 2003, 53:65-68.
- [8]Camerino D, Conway PM, Van der Heijden BI, Estryn-Behar M, Consonni D, Gould D, Hasselhorn HM, NEXT-Study Group: Low-perceived work ability, ageing and intention to leave nursing: a comparison among 10 European countries. J Adv Nurs 2006, 56:542-552.
- [9]Gould R, Ilmarinen J, Järvisalo J: Dimensions of work ability. Results from the Health 2000 Survey. Helsinki (Finland): Finnish Centre for Pensions; 2008. p. 25–34. Occup Environ Health 2008, 81:495-501.
- [10]de Croon EM, Sluiter JK, Nijssen TF, Kammeijer M, Dijkmans BA, Lankhorst GJ, Frings-Dresen MH: Work ability of Dutch employees with rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 2005, 34:277-283.
- [11]Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH: Quality of life and illness perception in working and sick-listed chronic RSI patients. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2008, 81:495-501.
- [12]Sormunen E, Remes J, Hassi J, Pienimäki T, Rintamäki H: Factors associated with self-estimated work ability and musculoskeletal symptoms among male and female workers in cooled food-processing facilities. Ind Health 2009, 47(3):271-282. Erratum in: Ind Health. 2009;47:453
- [13]Ahlstrom L, Grimby-Ekman A, Hagberg M, Dellve L: The work ability index and single-item question: associations with sick leave, symptoms, and health—a prospective study of women on long-term sick leave. Scand J Work Environ Health 2010, 36:404-412.
- [14]Dellve L, Karlberg C, Allebeck P, Herloff B, Hagberg M: Macro-organizational factors, the incidence of work disability, and work ability among the total workforce of home care workers in Sweden. Scand J Public Health 2006, 34:17-25.
- [15]von Bonsdorff MB, Seitsamo J, Ilmarinen J, Nygård CH, von Bonsdorff ME, Rantanen T: Work ability in midlife as a predictor of mortality and disability in later life: a 28-year prospective follow-up study. CMAJ. 2011, 183:E235-E242.
- [16]Radkiewich P, Widerszal-Bazyl M: Psychometric properties of work ability index in the light of comparative survey study. Int Congr Ser 2005, 1280:304-309.
- [17]Bowling A: Just one question: if one question works, why ask several? J Epidemiol Community Health 2005, 59:342-345.
- [18]Kuijer PP, Gouttebarge V, Wind H, van Duivenbooden C, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH: Prognostic value of self-reported work ability and performance-based lifting tests for sustainable return to work among construction workers. Scand J Work Environ Health 2012 Nov 1, 38(6):600-603.
- [19]Cohen J: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: L. Erlbaum Associates publishers; 1988.
- [20]WHO: Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2000, 894:1-253.
- [21]Meneses-Gaya IC, Zuardi AW, Loureiro SR, Crippa JA: Psychometric properties of the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence. J Bras Pneumol 2009, 35:73-82.
- [22]Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola A, Katajarinne L, Tulkki A: Work Ability Index. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health; 1994:24. ISBN 951-802-029-9
- [23]van Saane N, Sluiter JK, Verbeek JH, Frings-Dresen MH: Reliability and validity of instruments measuring job satisfaction--a systematic review. Occup Med (Lond) 2003, 53(3):191-200. Review
- [24]Wanous JP, Reichers AE, Hudy MJ: Overall job satisfaction: how good are single-item measures? J Appl Psychology 1997, 82:247-252.
- [25]Nagy MS: Using a single-item approach to measure facet job satisfaction. J Occup Organizational Psychology 2002, 75:77-86.
- [26]Tuomi K, Eskelinen L, Toikkanen J, Jarvinen E, Ilmarinen J, Klockars M: Work load and individual factors affecting work ability among aging municipal employees. Scand J Work Environ Health 1991, 17(Suppl 1):128-134.
- [27]Ilmarinen J, Tuomi K, Klockars M: Changes in the work ability of active employees over an 11-year period. Scand J Work Environ Health 1997, 23(suppl 1):49-57.
- [28]Goedhard WJ, Rijpstra TS, Puttiger PH: Age, absenteeism and physical fitness in relation to work ability. Stud Health Technol Inform 1998, 48:254-257.
- [29]Pohjonen T: Perceived work ability of home care workers in relation to individual and work-related factors in different age groups. Occup Med 2001, 51:209-217.
- [30]Tuomi K, Vanhala S, Nykyri E: Organizational practices, work demands and the well-being of employees: a follow-up study in the metal industry and retail trade. Occup Med 2004, 54:115-121.
- [31]Monteiro MS, Ilmarinen J, Corraa Filho HR: Work ability of workers in different age groups in a public health institution in Brazil. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 2006, 12:417-427.
- [32]Pohjonen T: Age-related physical fitness and the predictive values of fitness tests for work ability in home care work. J Occup Environ Med 2001, 43:723-730.
- [33]Tuomi K, Huuhtanen P, Nykyri E: Promotion of work ability, the quality of work and retirement. Occup Med 2001, 51:318-324.
- [34]Fischer FM, Borges FN, Rotenberg L, Latorre MDOR, Soares NS, Rosa PL, Teixeira LR, Nagai R, Steluti J, Landsbergis P: Work ability of health care shift workers: What matters? Chronobiol Int 2006, 23:1165-1179.
- [35]European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions: 4th European Working Conditions Survey. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2007:142. http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/ewco/ webcite
- [36]Nielsen J: Work ability within labour market status groups, industrial groups and age groups. In Past, Present and Future of Work Ability. Edited by Ilmarinen J, Lehtinen S. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, People and Work, Research Reports 65; 2004:41-47.
- [37]Perkiö-Mäkelä M, Hirvonen M, Elo A-L, Ervasti J, Huuhtanen P: Work and Health Survey 2006. Helsinki: Table report. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health; 2006.
- [38]Majery N, Duveau A, Lempereur I, Knauf-Hübel D: Results of an Intensive Rehabilitation Program for workers with chronic low back pain. Berlin: Deutsche Hauptversammlung zur Europäischen Woche; 2007.
- [39]Majery N, Delfosse V: Development and implementation of an evidence based guideline for aging workers in Luxembourg. Cancun, Mexico: 40th International Congress of Occupational Health; 2012.