期刊论文详细信息
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Risk factors for antepartum stillbirth: a case-control study in Nepal
Mats Målqvist2  Geha Nath Baral4  Ravi Vitrakoti1  Uwe Ewald2  Johan Wrammert2  Viktoria Nelin2  Ashish KC3 
[1] Foundation for Maternal and Child Health Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal;Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, International Maternal and Child Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, SE-751 85, Sweden;United Nation’s Children’s Fund, Nepal Country Office, UN House, Pulchowk, Nepal;Paropakar Maternity and Women’s Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
关键词: Nepal;    Risk factors;    Antepartum stillbirth;   
Others  :  1219959
DOI  :  10.1186/s12884-015-0567-3
 received in 2015-01-05, accepted in 2015-05-27,  发布年份 2015
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Globally, at least 2.65 million stillbirths occur every year, of which more than half are during the antepartum period. The proportion of intrapartum stillbirths has substantially declined with improved obstetric care; however, the number of antepartum stillbirths has not decreased as greatly. Attempts to lower this number may be hampered by an incomplete understanding of the risk factors leading to the majority of antepartum stillbirths. We conducted this study in a tertiary hospital in Nepal to identify the specific risk factors that are associated with antepartum stillbirth in this setting.

Methods

This case-control study was conducted between July 2012 and September 2013. All women who had antepartum stillbirths during this period were included as cases, while 20 % of all women delivering at the hospital were randomly selected and included as referents. Information on potential risk factors was taken from medical records and interviews with the women. Logistic regression analysis was completed to determine the association between those risk factors and antepartum stillbirth.

Results

During the study period, 4567 women who delivered at the hospital were enrolled as referents, of which 62 had antepartum stillbirths and were re-categorized into the case population. In total, there were 307 antepartum stillbirths. An association was found between the following risk factors and antepartum stillbirth: increasing maternal age (aOR 1.0, 95 % CI 1.0–1.1), less than five years of maternal education (aOR 2.4, 95 % CI 1.7–3.2), increasing parity (aOR 1.2, 95 % CI 1.0–1.3), previous stillbirth (aOR 2.6, 95 % CI 1.6–4.4), no antenatal care attendance (aOR 4.2, 95 % CI 3.2–5.4), belonging to the poorest family (aOR 1.3, 95 % CI 1.0–1.8), antepartum hemorrhage (aOR 3.7, 95 % CI 2.4–5.7), maternal hypertensive disorder during pregnancy (aOR 2.1, 95 % CI 1.5–3.1), and small weight-for-gestational age babies (aOR 1.5, 95 % CI 1.2–2.0).

Conclusion

Lack of antenatal care attendance, which had the strongest association with antepartum stillbirth, is a potentially modifiable risk factor, in that increasing the access to and availability of these services can be targeted. Antenatal care attendance provides an opportunity to screen for other potential risk factors for antepartum stillbirth, as well as to provide counseling to women, and thus, helps to ensure a successful pregnancy outcome.

Clinical trial registration

ISRCTN97846009 (url. www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN97846009)

【 授权许可】

   
2015 KC et al.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150720024053750.pdf 858KB PDF download
Fig. 2. 54KB Image download
Fig. 1. 60KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Pattinson R, Cousens S, Kumar R, Ibiebele I, Gardosi J, Day LT, Stanton C. Lancet’s Stillbirths Series steering committee: Stillbirths: Where? When? Why? How to make the data count? Lancet. 2011; 377(9775):1448-63.
  • [2]Cousens S, Blencowe H, Stanton C, Chou D, Ahmed S, Steinhardt L, Creanga AA, Tuncalp O, Balsara ZP, Gupta S, Say L, Lawn JE. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2009 with trends since 1995: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2011; 377(9774):1319-30.
  • [3]Goldenberg RL, McClure EM, Bann CM. The relationship of intrapartum and antepartum stillbirth rates to measures of obstetric care in developed and developing countries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007; 86(11):1303-9.
  • [4]Getahun D, Ananth CV, Kinzler WL. Risk factors for antepartum and intrapartum stillbirth: a population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 196(6):499-507.
  • [5]Salihu HM, Wilson RE, Alio AP, Kirby RS. Advanced maternal age and risk of antepartum and intrapartum stillbirth. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2008; 34(5):843-50.
  • [6]Facchinetti F, Alberico S, Benedetto C, Cetin I, Cozzolino S, Di Renzo GC, Del Giovane C, Ferrari F, Mecacci F, Menato G, Tranquilli AL, Baronciani D. Italian Stillbirth Study Group: a multicenter, case-control study on risk factors for antepartum stillbirth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011; 24(3):407-10.
  • [7]Evers AC, Nikkels PG, Brouwers HA, Boon J, van Egmond-Linden A, Hart C, Snuif YS, Sterken-Hooisma S, Bruinse HW, Kwee A. Substandard care in antepartum term stillbirths: prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011; 90(12):1416-22.
  • [8]Ha YP, Hurt LS, Tawiah-Agyemang C, Kirkwood BR, Edmond KM. Effect of socioeconomic deprivation and health service utilisation on antepartum and intrapartum stillbirth: population cohort study from rural Ghana. PLoS One. 2012; 7(7):e39050.
  • [9]Every Newborn: an action plan to end preventable deaths. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2014.
  • [10]Nepal Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (NMICS) 2014. In. Nepal, UNICEF; 2015.
  • [11]Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Oza S, You D, Lee AC, Waiswa P, Lalli M, Bhutta Z, Barros AJ, Christian P, Mathers C, Cousens SN. Lancet Every Newborn Study Group: Every Newborn: progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival. Lancet. 2014; 384(9938):189-205.
  • [12]Ashish KC, Malqvist M, Wrammert J, Verma S, Aryal DR, Clark R, Naresh PK, Vitrakoti R, Baral K, Ewald U. Implementing a simplified neonatal resuscitation protocol-helping babies breathe at birth (HBB) - at a tertiary level hospital in Nepal for an increased perinatal survival. BMC Pediatr. 2012; 12:159. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [13]Ministry of Health and Population GoN: Annual Report “Smarika” 2068/69. In. Kathmandu, Nepal: Paropakar Maternity and Women’s Hospital; 2011/12
  • [14]Unequal Citizens: Gender, Caste and Ethnic Exclusion in Nepal –Summary Report. World Bank, Department for International Development (DFID), Kathmandu; 2006.
  • [15]Howe LD, Hargreaves JR, Gabrysch S, Huttly SR. Is the wealth index a proxy for consumption expenditure? A systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009; 63(11):871-7.
  • [16]Rutstein SO, Johnson K. The DHS Wealth Index. DHS Comparative Reports No. 6. Calverton, Maryland: ORC Macro. 2004.
  • [17]Filmer D, Pritchett LH. Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data–or tears: an application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography. 2001; 38(1):115-32.
  • [18]Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 87(2):163-8.
  • [19]Barnard J, Meng XL. Applications of multiple imputation in medical studies: from AIDS to NHANES. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999; 8(1):17-36.
  • [20]Flenady V, Koopmans L, Middleton P, Froen JF, Smith GC, Gibbons K, Coory M, Gordon A, Ellwood D, McIntyre HD, Fretts R, Ezzati M. Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2011; 377(9774):1331-40.
  • [21]Mavalankar DV, Trivedi CR, Gray RH. Levels and risk factors for perinatal mortality in Ahmedabad, India. Bull World Health Organ. 1991; 69(4):435-42.
  • [22]Smith R, Maiti K, Aitken RJ. Unexplained antepartum stillbirth: a consequence of placental aging? Placenta. 2013; 34(4):310-3.
  • [23]Haws RA, Yakoob MY, Soomro T, Menezes EV, Darmstadt GL, Bhutta ZA. Reducing stillbirths: screening and monitoring during pregnancy and labour. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009; 9 Suppl 1:S5. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [24]Jabeen M, Yakoob MY, Imdad A, Bhutta ZA. Impact of interventions to prevent and manage preeclampsia and eclampsia on stillbirths. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11 Suppl 3:S6. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [25]Hofmeyr GJ, Haws RA, Bergstrom S, Lee AC, Okong P, Darmstadt GL, Mullany LC, Oo EK, Lawn JE. Obstetric care in low-resource settings: what, who, and how to overcome challenges to scale up? Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009; 107 Suppl 1:S21-44.
  • [26]Aama Surakshya Karyakram 2009. Family Health Division, Kathmandu, Nepal; 2009.
  • [27]Nepal Demographic and Health Survey 2011. New Era, Kathmandu, Nepal; 2011.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:148次 浏览次数:154次