The orthotic and therapeutic effects following daily community applied functional electrical stimulation in children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy: a randomised controlled trial

BMC Pediatrics

Katherine Stannage¹  Catherine Elliott⁴  Cyril J. Donnelly⁵  Natasha Bear³  Jane Valentine²  Dayna Pool⁵ 

[1] Department of Orthopaedics, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Roberts Road, Subiaco 6008, Australia;Department of Paediatric Rehabilitation, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Roberts Road, Subiaco 6008, Australia;Department of Physiotherapy and Paediatric Rehabilitation, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Roberts Road, Subiaco 6008, Australia;Curtin University of Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Kent Street, Bentley 6012, Australia;School of Sport Science Exercise and Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley 6009, Australia

关键词: Functional electrical stimulation;    Carry over effect;    Therapeutic effect;    Orthotic effect;    Temporal-spatial parameters;    Ankle kinematics;    Randomised controlled trial;    Spastic hemiplegia;    Unilateral spastic cerebral palsy;    Cerebral palsy;   

Others  :  1232660
DOI  :  10.1186/s12887-015-0472-y

 received in 2015-01-07, accepted in 2015-10-02,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

The purpose of this study was to determine the orthotic and therapeutic effects of daily community applied FES to the ankle dorsiflexors in a randomized controlled trial. We hypothesized that children receiving the eight-week FES treatment would demonstrate orthotic and therapeutic effects in gait and spasticity as well as better community mobility and balance skills compared to controls not receiving FES.

Methods

This randomized controlled trial involved 32 children (mean age 10 yrs 3 mo, SD 3 yrs 3 mo; 15 females, 17 males) with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy and a Gross Motor Function Classification System of I or II randomly assigned to a FES treatment group (n = 16) or control group (n = 16). The treatment group received eight weeks of daily FES (four hours per day, six days per week) and the control group received usual orthotic and therapy treatment. Children were assessed at baseline, post FES treatment (eight weeks) and follow-up (six weeks after post FES treatment). Outcome measures included lower limb gait mechanics, clinical measures of gastrocnemius spasticity and community mobility balance skills.

Results

Participants used the FES for a mean daily use of 6.2 (SD 3.2) hours over the eight-week intervention period. With FES, the treatment group demonstrated a significant (p < 0.05) increase in initial contact ankle angle (mean difference 11.9° 95 % CI 6.8° to 17.1°), maximum dorsiflexion ankle angle in swing (mean difference 8.1° 95 % CI 1.8° to 14.4°) normalized time in stance (mean difference 0.27 95 % CI 0.05 to 0.49) and normalized step length (mean difference 0.06 95 % CI 0.003 to 0.126) post treatment compared to the control group. Without FES, the treatment group significantly increased community mobility balance scores at post treatment (mean difference 8.3 units 95 % CI 3.2 to 13.4 units) and at follow-up (mean difference 8.9 units 95 % CI 3.8 to13.9 units) compared to the control group. The treatment group also had significantly reduced gastrocnemius spasticity at post treatment (p = 0.038) and at follow-up (dynamic range of motion mean difference 6.9°, 95 % CI 0.4° to 13.6°; p = 0.035) compared to the control group.

Conclusion

This study documents an orthotic effect with improvement in lower limb mechanics during gait. Therapeutic effects i.e. without FES were observed in clinical measures of gastrocnemius spasticity, community mobility and balance skills in the treatment group at post treatment and follow-up. This study supports the use of FES applied during daily walking activities to improve gait mechanics as well as to address community mobility issues among children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy.

Trial registration

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Register ACTRN12614000949684. Registered 4 September 2014.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Pool et al.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, Goldstein M, Bax M. The definition and classification of cerebral palsy contents foreword historical perspective definition and classification document. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007; 109:1-44.
• [2]Beckung E, Carlsson G, Carlsdotter S, Uvebrant P. The natural history of gross motor development in children with cerebral palsy aged 1 to 15 years. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007; 49(10):751-6.
• [3]Winters TF, Gage JR, Hicks R. Gait patterns in spastic hemiplegia in children and young adults. J Bone Jt Surg. 1987; 69(3):437-41.
• [4]Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Walter S, Russell D, Wood E, Galuppi B. Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997; 39:214-23.
• [5]Hadders-Algra M. The neuronal group selection theory: promising principles for understanding and treating developmental motor disorders. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000; 42(10):707-15.
• [6]Hadders-Algra M. Variation and variability: key words in human motor development. Phys Ther. 2010; 90(12):1823-37.
• [7]Novak I, McIntyre S, Morgan C, Campbell L, Dark L, Morton N et al.. A systematic review of interventions for children with cerebral palsy: state of the evidence. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013; 55(10):885-910.
• [8]Eyre JA. Corticospinal tract development and its plasticity after perinatal injury. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2007; 31:1136-49.
• [9]Johnston MV. Plasticity in the developing brain: implications for rehabilitation. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2009; 15(2):94-101.
• [10]Love SC, Novak I, Kentish M, Desloovere K, Heinen F, Molenaers G et al.. Botulinum toxin assessment, intervention and after-care for lower limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy: international consensus statement. Eur J Neurol. 2010; 17 Suppl 2:9-37.
• [11]Romkes J, Brunner R. Comparison of a dynamic and a hinged ankle-foot orthosis by gait analysis in patients with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 2002; 15(1):18-24.
• [12]Buckon CE, Thomas SS, Jakobson-Huston S, Sussman M, Aiona M. Comparison of three ankle-foot orthosis configurations for children with spastic hemiplegia. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001; 43(6):371-8.
• [13]Desloovere K, Molenaers G, Van Gestel L, Huenaerts C, Van Campenhout A, Callewaert B et al.. How can push-off be preserved during use of an ankle foot orthosis in children with hemiplegia? A prospective controlled study. Gait Posture. 2006; 24(2):142-51.
• [14]Autti-Ramo I, Suoranta J, Anttila H, Malmivaara A, Makela M. Effectiveness of upper and lower limb casting and orthoses in children with cerebral palsy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 85(1):89-103.
• [15]Figueiredo EM, Ferreira GB, Maia Moreira RC, Kirkwood RN, Fetters L. Efficacy of ankle-foot orthoses on gait of children with cerebral palsy: systematic review of literature. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2008; 20(3):207-23.
• [16]Reed B. The physiology of neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Pediatr Phys Ther. 1997; 9:96-102.
• [17]Prosser LA, Curatalo LA, Alter KE, Damiano DL. Acceptability and potential effectiveness of a foot drop stimulator in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012; 54(11):1044-9.
• [18]Postans NJ, Granat MH. Effect of functional electrical stimulation applied during walking, on gait in spastic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005; 47:46-52.
• [19]Cauraugh JH, Naik SK, Hsu WH, Coombes SA, Holt KG. Children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis on gait and electrical stimulation. Clin Rehabil. 2010; 24(11):963-78.
• [20]Franki I, Desloovere K, De Cat J, Feys H, Molenaers G, Calders P et al.. The evidence-base for basic physical therapy techniques targeting lower limb function in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a conceptual framework. J Rehabil Med. 2012; 44(5):385-95.
• [21]Alon G. Electrical stimulation in cerebral palsy: are we asking clinically relevant questions? Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006; 48(11):868.
• [22]Meilahn JR. Tolerability and effectiveness of a neuroprosthesis for the treatment of footdrop in pediatric patients with hemiparetic cerebral palsy. PMR. 2013; 5(6):503-9.
• [23]Pool D, Blackmore AM, Bear N, Valentine J. Effects of short-term daily community walk aide use on children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2014; 26(3):308-17.
• [24]Graham K, Selber P. Musculoskeletal aspects of cerebral palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003; 85(2):157-66.
• [25]Freedson P, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 1998; 30:777-81.
• [26]Hof AL. Scaling gait data to body size. Gait Posture. 1996; 4:222-3.
• [27]Howe JA, Inness EL, Venturini A, Williams JI, Verrier MC. The Community Balance and Mobility Scale-a balance measure for individuals with traumatic brain injury. Clin Rehabil. 2006; 20(10):885-95.
• [28]Brien M, Sveistrup H. An intensive virtual reality program improves functional balance and mobility of adolescents with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2011; 23(3):258-66.
• [29]Wright FV, Ryan J, Brewer K. Reliability of the Community Balance and Mobility Scale (CB&M) in high-functioning school-aged children and adolescents who have an acquired brain injury. Brain Inj. 2010; 24(13–14):1585-94.
• [30]Dite W, Temple VA. A clinical test of stepping and change of direction to identify multiple falling older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83(11):1566-71.
• [31]Boyd R, Graham HK. Objective measurement of clinical findings in the use of botulinum toxin type A for the management of children with cerebral palsy. Eur J Neurol. 1999; 6 Suppl 4:S23-35.
• [32]McDowell BC, Hewitt V, Nurse A, Weston TBR. The variability of goniometric measurements in ambulatory children with spastic cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 2000; 12(2):114-21.
• [33]Love S, Gibson N, Cole J, Williams N, Blair E. The reliability of the Australian Spasticity Assessment Scale (Abstract). Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50(Suppl 113):4-17.
• [34]Spink MJ, Fotoohabadi MR, Menz HB. Foot and ankle strength assessment using hand-held dynamometry: Reliability and age-related differences. Gerontology. 2010; 56(6):525-32.
• [35]Jethwa A, Mink J, Macarthur C, Knights S, Fehlings T, Fehlings D. Development of the Hypertonia Assessment Tool (HAT): a discriminative tool for hypertonia in children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009; 52(5):e83-7.
• [36]Pierce S, Orlin M, Lauer R, Johnston T, Smith B, McCarthy J. Comparison of percutaneous and surface functional electrical stimulation during gait in a child with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 83(10):798-805.
• [37]Durham S, Eve L, Stevens C, Ewins D. Effect of Functional Electrical Stimulation on asymmetries in gait of children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Physiotherapy. 2004; 90(2):82-90.
• [38]Van der Linden ML, Hazlewood ME, Hillman SJ, Robb JE. Functional electrical stimulation to the dorsiflexors and quadriceps in children with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2008; 20(1):23-9.
• [39]Seifart A, Unger M, Burger M. Functional Electrical Stimulation to lower limb muscles after botox in children with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2010; 22:199-206.
• [40]Comeaux P, Patterson N, Rubin M, Meiner R. Effect of neuromucular electrical stimulation during gait in children with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 1997; 9:103-9.
• [41]Carmick J. Clinical use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation for children with cerebral palsy, Part 1: Lower extremity. Phys Ther. 1993; 73(8):505-13.
• [42]Rushton DN. Functional Electrical Stimulation and rehabilitation — an hypothesis. Med Eng Phys. 2003; 25(25):75-8.
• [43]Leonard CT, Sandholdt DY, Mcmillan JA, Queen S. Short- and Long-latency contributions to recicpocal inhibition during various levels of muscle contraction of individuals with cerebral palsy. J Child Neurol. 2006; 21:240-6.
• [44]Gross R, Leboeuf F, Hardouin JB, Lempereur M, Perrouin-Verbe B, Remy-Neris O et al.. The influence of gait speed on co-activation in unilateral spastic cerebral palsy children. Clin Biomech. 2013; 28(3):312-7.
• [45]Patterson KK, Gage WH, Brooks D, Black SE, McIlroy WE. Evaluation of gait symmetry after stroke: a comparison of current methods and recommendations for standardization. Gait Posture. 2010; 31(2):241-6.
• [46]Bergquist AJ, Clair JM, Lagerquist O, Mang CS, Okuma Y, Collins DF. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation: implications of the electrically evoked sensory volley. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011; 111(10):2409-26.
• [47]Hazlewood ME, Brown JK, Rowe PJ, Salter P. The use of therapeutic electrical stimulation in the treatment of hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1994; 36:661-73.
• [48]Grunt S, van Kampen PJ, van der Krogt MM, Brehm M-A, Doorenbosch CM, Becher JG. Reproducibility and validity of video screen measurements of gait in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 2010; 31(4):489-94.