Long-term impact of intrauterine fetal death on quality of life and depression: a case–control study

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Øivind Ekeberg¹  Per Morten Sandset²  Eva-Marie Jacobsen²  Linda Bjørk Helgadottir²  Ida Kathrine Gravensteen¹ 

[1] Department of Behavioural Sciences in Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway;Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

关键词: Socioeconomic status;    Well-being;    Depression;    Quality of life;    Intrauterine fetal death;   

Others  :  1152852
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2393-12-43

 received in 2011-12-23, accepted in 2012-06-07,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

Intrauterine fetal death (IUFD) is a serious incidence that has been shown to impact mothers’ psychological well-being in the short-term. Long-term quality of life (QOL) and depression after IUFD is not known. This study aimed to determine the association between intrauterine fetal death and long-term QOL, well-being, and depression.

Methods

Analyses were performed on collected data among 106 women with a history of intrauterine fetal death (IUFD) and 262 women with live births, 5–18 years after the event. Univariable and multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to quantify the association between previous fetal death and long-term QOL, well-being and depression. QOL was assessed using the QOL Index (QLI), symptoms of depression using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), and subjective well-being using the General Health Questionnaire 20 (GHQ-20).

Results

More of the cases had characteristics associated with lower socioeconomic status and did not rate their health as good as did the controls. The QLI health and functioning subscale score was slightly but significantly lower in the cases than in the controls (22.3. vs 23.5, P = .023). The CES-D depressed affect subscale score (2.0 vs 1.0, P = 0.004) and the CES-D global score (7.4 vs 5.0, P = .017) were higher in the cases. Subjective well-being did not differ between groups (20.6 vs 19.4, P = .094). After adjusting for demographic and health-related variables, IUFD was not associated with global QOL (P = .674), subjective well-being (P = .700), or global depression score (adjusted odds ratio = 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.37–1.57).

Conclusions

Women with previous IUFD, of which the majority have received short-term interventions, share the same level of long-term QOL, well-being and global depression as women with live births only, when adjusted for possible confounders.

Trial registration

The study was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov webcite, with registration number NCT 00856076.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Gravensteen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Vance JC, Foster WJ, Najman JM, Embelton G, Thearle MJ, Hodgen FM: Early parental responses to sudden infant death, stillbirth or neonatal death. Med J Aust 1991, 155:292-297.
• [2]Boyle FM, Vance JC, Najman JM, Thearle MJ: The mental health impact of stillbirth, neonatal death or SIDS: prevalence and patterns of distress among mothers. Soc Sci Med 1996, 43:1273-1282.
• [3]Hughes PM, Turton P, Evans CD: Stillbirth as risk factor for depression and anxiety in the subsequent pregnancy: cohort study. BMJ 1999, 318:1721-1724.
• [4]Turton P, Hughes P, Evans CD, Fainman D: Incidence, correlates and predictors of post-traumatic stress disorder in the pregnancy after stillbirth. Br J Psychiatry 2001, 178:556-560.
• [5]Radestad I, Steineck G, Nordin C, Sjogren B: Psychological complications after stillbirth—influence of memories and immediate management: population based study. BMJ 1996, 312:1505-1508.
• [6]Cacciatore J, Radestad I, Frederik FJ: Effects of contact with stillborn babies on maternal anxiety and depression. Birth 2008, 35:313-320.
• [7]Turton P, Evans C, Hughes P: Long-term psychosocial sequelae of stillbirth: phase II of a nested case–control cohort study. Arch Womens Mental Health 2009, 12:35-41.
• [8]Bergrem A, Jacobsen EM, Skjeldestad FE, Jacobsen AF, Skogstad M, Sandset PM: The association of antiphospholipid antibodies with pregnancy-related first time venous thrombosis—a population-based case–control study. Thromb Res 2010, 125:e222-e227.
• [9]Ferrans CE, Powers MJ: Quality of life index: development and psychometric properties. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 1985, 8:15-24.
• [10]Ferrans CE, Powers MJ: Psychometric assessment of the Quality of Life Index. Res Nurs Health 1992, 15:29-38.
• [11]Rustoen T, Wiklund I, Hanestad BR, Burckhardt CS: Validity and reliability of the Norwegian version of the Ferrans and Powers Quality of Life Index. Scand J Caring Sci 1999, 13:96-101.
• [12]Goldberg D, Williams P: A user’s guide to the general health questionnaire. NFER-Nelson, Windsor, UK; 1988.
• [13]Malt UF: The validity of the General Health Questionnaire in a sample of accidentally injured adults. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 1989, 355:103-112.
• [14]Malt UF, Mogstad TE, Refnin IB: [Goldberg’s General Health Questionnaire.]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 1989, 109:1391-1394.
• [15]Radloff LS: The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977, 3:385-401.
• [16]Copay AG, Subach BR, Glassman SD, Polly DW, Schuler TC: Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods. Spine J 2007, 7:541-6.17.
• [17]Gullberg MT, Hollman-Frisman G, Ek AC: Reference values for the Quality of Life Index in the general Swedish population 18–80 years of age. Qual Life Res 2010, 19:751-760.
• [18]Rannestad T, Skjeldestad FE: Pain and quality of life among long-term gynecological cancer survivors: a population-based case–control study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007, 86:1510-1516.
• [19]Rannestad T, Skjeldestad FE, Platou TF, Hagen B: Quality of life among long-term gynaecological cancer survivors. Scand J Caring Sci 2008, 22:472-477.
• [20]Vance JC, Najman JM, Thearle MJ, Embelton G, Foster WJ, Boyle FM: Psychological changes in parents eight months after the loss of an infant from stillbirth, neonatal death, or sudden infant death syndrome—a longitudinal study. Pediatrics 1995, 96:933-938.
• [21]Radestad I, Sjogren B, Nordin C, Steineck G: Stillbirth and maternal well-being. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997, 76:849-855.
• [22]Calderon-Margalit R, Friedlander Y, Yanetz R, Deutsch L, Manor O, Harlap S, Paltiel O: Late stillbirths and long-term mortality of mothers. Obstet Gynecol 2007, 109:1301-1308.
• [23]Hughes P, Turton P, Hopper E, Evans CD: Assessment of guidelines for good practice in psychosocial care of mothers after stillbirth: a cohort study. Lancet 2002, 360:114-118.
• [24]Cnattingius S, Stephansson O: The epidemiology of stillbirth. Semin Perinatol 2002, 26:25-30.
• [25]Goldenberg RL, Kirby R, Culhane JF: Stillbirth: a review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004, 16:79-94.
• [26]Galea S, Tracy M: Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. Ann Epidemiol 2007, 17:643-653.