Methodological and ethical issues in research using social media: a metamethod of Human Papillomavirus vaccine studies

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Claire F Woodworth¹  Diana L Gustafson¹ 

[1] Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John’s, Canada

关键词: Methodology;    Ethics;    HPV vaccination;    Data collection;    Social media;    Metamethod;   

Others  :  1090407
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2288-14-127

 received in 2014-07-22, accepted in 2014-11-18,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Online content is a primary source of healthcare information for internet-using adults and a rich resource for health researchers. This paper explores the methodological and ethical issues of engaging in health research using social media.

Methods

A metamethod was performed on systematically selected studies that used social media as a data source for exploring public awareness and beliefs about Human Papillomaviruses (HPV) and HPV vaccination. Seven electronic databases were searched using a variety of search terms identified for each of three concepts: social media, HPV vaccine, and research method. Abstracts were assessed for eligibility of inclusion; six studies met the eligibility criteria and were subjected to content analysis. A 10-item coding scheme was developed to assess the clarity, congruence and transparency of research design, epistemological and methodological underpinnings and ethical considerations.

Results

The designs of the six selected studies were sound, although most studies could have been more transparent about how they built in rigor to ensure the trustworthiness and credibility of findings. Statistical analysis that intended to measure trends and patterns did so without the benefit of randomized sampling and other design elements for ensuring generalizability or reproducibility of findings beyond the specified virtual community. Most researchers did not sufficiently engage virtual users in the research process or consider the risk of privacy incursion. Most studies did not seek ethical approval from an institutional research board or permission from host websites or web service providers.

Conclusions

The metamethod exposed missed opportunities for using the dialogical character of social media as well as a lack of attention to the unique ethical issues inherent in operating in a virtual community where social boundaries and issues of public and private are ambiguous. This suggests the need for more self-conscious and ethical research practices when using social media as a data source. Given the relative newness of virtual communities, researchers and ethics review boards must work together to develop expertise in evaluating the design of studies undertaken with virtual communities. We recommend that the principles of concern for welfare, respect for person, and justice to be applied in research using social media.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Gustafson and Woodworth; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Donelle L, Booth R: Health tweets: an exploration of health promotion on twitter. Online J Issues Nurs 2012, 17(3):4. doi:10.3912/OJIN.Vol17No03Man04
• [2]Estabrook L, Rainie L, Witt E: Information searches that solve problems. Pew Research Internet Project Report 2007. [http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2007/Information-Searches-That-Solve-Problems.aspx webcite]
• [3]Horrigan J, Rainie L: The internet’s growing role in life’s major moments. Pew Research Internet Project Report 2006. [http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2006/The-Internets-Growing-Role-in-Lifes-Major-Moments.aspx webcite]
• [4]Fox S: The social life of health information. Pew Research Internet Project Report 2011. [http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2011/PIP_Social_Life_of_Health_Info.pdf webcite]
• [5]Rogers Inc: Innovation report. Trend Watch 2012. [http://redboard.rogers.com/rirexplores/ webcite]
• [6]Fox S, Duggan M: Health online 2013. Pew Research Internet Project Report 2013. [http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/ webcite]
• [7]Maczewski M: Understanding how information and communication technologies matter to youth: a network of developmental, social and technological dynamics. Victoria: University of Victoria, Department of Human and Social Development; 2007. [MA thesis]
• [8]Paterson BL, Thorne SE, Canam C, Jillings C: MetaStudy of Qualitative Health Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2001.
• [9]Bondas T, Hall EOC: Challenges in approaching metasynthesis research. Qual Health Res 2007, 17:113-121.
• [10]Zhao S: Metatheory, metamethod, metadata-analysis: what, why, and how? Soc Perspect 1991, 34:377-390.
• [11]Paterson BL: The shifting perspectives model of chronic disease. J Nurs Scholarsh 2001, 33:21-26.
• [12]Minnaar A: Student support in e-learning courses in higher education: insights from a metasynthesis. Afr Educ Rev 2011, 8:483-503.
• [13]Burla L, Knierim B, Barth J, Liewald K, Duetz M, Abel T: From text to codings: intercoder reliability assessment in qualitative content analysis. Nurs Res 2008, 57:113-117.
• [14]Battles HT: Exploring ethical and methodological issues in internet-based research with adolescents. Int J Qual Methods 2010, 9:27-39.
• [15]Keelan J, Parvi V, Balakrishnana R, Wilson K: An analysis of the human papilloma virus vaccine debate on MySpace blogs. Vaccine 2010, 28:1535-1540.
• [16]Keelan J, Parvi-Garcia V, Tomlinson G, Wilson K: YouTube as a source of information on immunization: a content analysis. JAMA 2007, 298:2482-2484.
• [17]Lee S-J, Yung H-J, Lee K-H, Kim C-J, Park J-S: What questions do people ask on a Human Papillomavirus website? a comparative analysis of public and private questions. Int J Med Sci 2012, 9:142-147.
• [18]Ache KA, Wallace LS: Human Papillomavirus vaccination coverage on YouTube. Am J Prev Med 2008, 35:389-392.
• [19]Briones R, Nan X, Madden K, Waks L: When vaccines go viral: an analysis of HPV vaccine coverage on YouTube. Health Commun 2012, 27:478-485.
• [20]Tuli F: The basis of distinction between qualitative and quantitative research in social science. Ethiop J Educ Sci 2010, 6:97-108.
• [21]Reitmanova S: In search of respect for qualitative research. Qual Health Res 2008, 18:718-719.
• [22]boyd d, Crawford K: Critical questions for big data: provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Inf Commun Soc 2012, 15:662-679.
• [23]Markham A, Buchanan E: Ethical decision-making and internet research. Association of Internet Researchers; 2012. [http://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf webcite]
• [24]Zimmer M: “But the data is already public”: on the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics Inf Technol 2010, 12:313-325.
• [25]boyd d, Marwick A: Social privacy in networked publics: teens’ attitudes, practices, and strategies. 2011. [http://www.danah.org/papers/2011/SocialPrivacyPLSC-Draft.pdf webcite]
• [26]boyd d: Privacy and publicity in the context of big data. Raleigh 2010. [http://www.danah.org/papers/talks/2010/WWW2010.html webcite]
• [27]Weindling P: The origins of informed consent: the International Scientific Commission on Medical War Crimes, and the Nuremberg Code. B Hist Med 2001, 75:37-71.
• [28]Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC): Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research involving Humans. 2nd edition. 2010. [http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/pdf/eng/tcps2/TCPS_2_FINAL_Web.pdf webcite]
• [29]Halleck T: Facebook changes user experimentation policy following mood research backlash. International Business Times 2014. [http://www.ibtimes.com/facebook-changes-user-experimentation-policy-following-mood-research-backlash-1698804 webcite]
• [30]Gustafson D, Brunger F: Ethics, “vulnerability” and feminist participatory action research with a disability community. Qual Health Res 2014, 24:997-1005.