期刊论文详细信息
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Induction of twin pregnancy and the risk of caesarean delivery: a cohort study
Maria Jonsson1 
[1] Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, SE-751 85, Sweden
关键词: Twin pregnancy;    Twin delivery;    Labour;    Induction method;    Induction;    Caesarean section;    Bishop score;   
Others  :  1213797
DOI  :  10.1186/s12884-015-0566-4
 received in 2014-11-28, accepted in 2015-05-20,  发布年份 2015
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Complications are common in twin pregnancies and induction of labour is often indicated. Most methods for induction are used but data on risks related to induction methods are sparse. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between induction of labour and caesarean delivery in twin pregnancies, and to assess the influence of induction method.

Methods

Cohort study of twin pregnancies ≥ 34 weeks, planned for vaginal delivery, from two University Hospitals in Sweden. Data were collected from medical records during the periods 1994 (Örebro) and 2004 (Uppsala) to 2013. During the study period there were 78,180 live born births and 1,282 were twin births. Women with previous caesarean section were excluded. Induction methods were categorized into amniotomy, oxytocin and cervical ripening (intra cervical Foley catheter or prostaglandin). Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) for caesarean section were calculated by logistic regression and were adjusted for parity, maternal age, gestational length, complications to the pregnancy, infant birth weight and year of birth. Spontaneous labour onsets were used as the reference group. The main outcome measure was caesarean section.

Results

In 462 twin pregnancies, 220 (48 %) had induction of labour and 242 (52 %) a spontaneous labour onset. Amniotomy was performed in 149 (68 %) of these inductions, oxytocin was administered in 11 (5 %) and cervical ripening was used in 60 (27 %). The rate of caesarean sections was 21 % in induced and 12 % in spontaneous labours (p 0.01). The absolute risk of caesarean section following induction was: 15 % with amniotomy; 36 % with oxytocin and 37 % with Foley/prostaglandin. Induction of labour increased the risk of caesarean section by 90 % compared with spontaneous labour onset (AOR 1.9, 95 % CI 1.1-3.5) and, when cervical ripening was used, the risk increased more than two fold (AOR 2.5, 95 % CI 1.2-5.3).

Conclusion

Induction of labour in twin pregnancies increases the risk of caesarean section compared with spontaneous labour onset, especially if Foley catheter or prostaglandins are required. However, approximately 80 % of induced labours are delivered vaginally.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Jonsson.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20150616021147643.pdf 574KB PDF download
Fig. 1. 45KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Fig. 1.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Leftwich HK, Zaki MN, Wilkins I, Hibbard JU. Labor patterns in twin gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 209(3):254 e1-5.
  • [2]Healy AJ, Gaddipati S. Intrapartum management of twins: truths and controversies. Clin Perinatol. 2005; 32(2):455-473.
  • [3]Rauh-Hain JA, Rana S, Tamez H, Wang A, Cohen B, Cohen A et al.. Risk for developing gestational diabetes in women with twin pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009; 22(4):293-299.
  • [4]Krotz S, Fajardo J, Ghandi S, Patel A, Keith LG. Hypertensive disease in twin pregnancies: a review. Twin Res. 2002; 5(1):8-14.
  • [5]Sibai BM, Hauth J, Caritis S, Lindheimer MD, MacPherson C, Klebanoff M et al.. Hypertensive disorders in twin versus singleton gestations. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 182(4):938-942.
  • [6]Hauth JC, Ewell MG, Levine RJ, Esterlitz JR, Sibai B, Curet LB et al.. Pregnancy outcomes in healthy nulliparas who developed hypertension. Calcium for Preeclampsia Prevention Study Group. Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 95(1):24-28.
  • [7]Hnat MD, Sibai BM, Caritis S, Hauth J, Lindheimer MD, MacPherson C et al.. Perinatal outcome in women with recurrent preeclampsia compared with women who develop preeclampsia as nulliparas. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 186(3):422-426.
  • [8]Elling SV, McKenna P, Powell FC. Pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy in twin and triplet pregnancies. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2000; 14(5):378-381.
  • [9]Dodd JM, Deussen AR, Grivell RM, Crowther CA. Elective birth at 37 weeks’ gestation for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2014; 2: Article ID CD003582
  • [10]Clark SL, Miller DD, Belfort MA, Dildy GA, Frye DK, Meyers JA. Neonatal and maternal outcomes associated with elective term delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 200(2):156 e1-4.
  • [11]Yeast JD, Jones A, Poskin M. Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: A review of 7001 consecutive inductions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 180(3 Pt 1):628-633.
  • [12]Fausett MB, Barth WH, Yoder BA, Satin AJ. Oxytocin labor stimulation of twin gestations: effective and efficient. Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 90(2):202-204.
  • [13]Bush MC, Csaba A, Eddleman KA, Saphier CJ. Is misoprostol safe for labor induction in twin gestations? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006; 19(1):35-38.
  • [14]Harle T, Brun JL, Leng JJ. Induction of labor in twin pregnancy after 36 weeks does not increase maternal-fetal morbidity. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002; 77(1):15-21.
  • [15]Caughey AB, Nicholson JM, Cheng YW, Lyell DJ, Washington AE. Induction of labor and cesarean delivery by gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 195(3):700-705.
  • [16]Caughey AB, Sundarman V, Kaimal AJ, Cheng YW, Gienger A, Little SE et al.. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009; 176:1-257.
  • [17]Rasmussen ORS. Cesarean section after induction of labor compared with expectant management: no added risk from gestational week 39. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011; 90:857-862.
  • [18]Darney BG, Snowden JM, Cheng YW, Jacob L, Nicholson JM, Kaimal A et al.. Elective induction of labor at term compared with expectant management: maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 122(4):761-769.
  • [19]Osmundson S, Ou-Yang RJ, Grobman WA. Elective induction compared with expectant management in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117(3):583-587.
  • [20]Stock SJ, Ferguson E, Duffy A, Ford I, Chalmers J, Norman JE. Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study. BMJ. 2012; 344: Article ID e2838
  • [21]Gulmezoglu AM, Crowther CA, Middleton P, Heatley E. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2012; 6: Article ID CD004945
  • [22]Caughey AB, Sundaram V, Kaimal AJ, Gienger A, Cheng YW, McDonald KM et al.. Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151(4):252-263.
  • [23]Suzuki S, Otsubo Y, Sawa R, Yoneyama Y, Araki T. Clinical trial of induction of labor versus expectant management in twin pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2000; 49(1):24-27.
  • [24]Friedman EASM. The effect of uterine over distention on labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1964; 23:164-172.
  • [25]Harper LM, Caughey AB, Odibo AO, Roehl KA, Zhao Q, Cahill AG. Normal progress of induced labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 119(6):1113-1118.
  • [26]Safe prevention of the primary cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 210(3):179-73.
  • [27]Smith GC, Pell JP, Dobbie R. Birth order, gestational age, and risk of delivery related perinatal death in twins: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2002; 325(7371):1004.
  • [28]Statistics-Health and Medical Care,Pregnancies, Deliveries and Newborn Infants. The Swedish Medical Birth Register 1973–2009. 2011.30. Assisted Reproduction, treatment 1991–2008
  • [29]Barrett JF, Hannah ME, Hutton EK, Willan AR, Allen AC, Armson BA et al.. A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. New Eng J Med. 2013; 369(14):1295-1305.
  • [30]Hoffmann E, Oldenburg A, Rode L, Tabor A, Rasmussen S, Skibsted L. Twin births: cesarean section or vaginal delivery? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012; 91(4):463-469.
  • [31]Wenckus DJ, Gao W, Kominiarek MA, Wilkins I. The effects of labor and delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes in term twins: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG. 2014; 121(9):1137-1144.
  • [32]Roberts CL, Algert CS, Nippita TA, Bowen JR, Shand AW. Association of prelabor cesarean delivery with reduced mortality in twins born near term. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 125(1):103-110.
  • [33]Burrows LJ, Meyn LA, Weber AM. Maternal morbidity associated with vaginal versus cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 103(5 Pt 1):907-912.
  • [34]Villar J, Valladares E, Wojdyla D, Zavaleta N, Carroli G, Velazco A et al.. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet. 2006; 367(9525):1819-1829.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:15次 浏览次数:11次