Analyzes of genome-wide association follow-up study for calving traits in dairy cattle

BMC Genetics

Goutam Sahana¹  Mogens S Lund¹  Bernt Guldbrandtsen¹  Johanna K Höglund² 

[1] Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, P.O. Box 50, Tjele, DK-8830, Denmark;Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7070, Uppsala, 750 07, Sweden

关键词: Cattle;    QTL;    Calving traits;    Confirmation study;    Association mapping;   

Others  :  1121380
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2156-13-71

 received in 2012-03-06, accepted in 2012-08-02,  发布年份 2012

【 摘 要 】

Background

There is often a pronounced disagreement between results obtained from different genome-wide association studies in cattle. There are multiple reasons for this disagreement. Particularly the presence of false positives leads to a need to validate detected QTL before they are optimally incorporated or weighted in selection decisions or further studied for causal gene. In dairy cattle progeny testing scheme new data is routinely accumulated which can be used to validate previously discovered associations. However, the data is not an independent sample and the sample size may not be sufficient to have enough power to validate previous discoveries. Here we compared two strategies to validate previously detected QTL when new data is added from the same study population. We compare analyzing a combined dataset (COMB) including all data presently available to only analyzing a validation dataset (VAL) i.e. a new dataset not previously analyzed as an independent replication. Secondly, we confirm SNP detected in the Reference population (REF) (i.e. previously analyzed dataset consists of older bulls) in the VAL dataset.

Results

Clearly the results from the combined (COMB) dataset which had nearly twice the sample size of other two subsets allowed the detection of far more significant associations than the two smaller subsets. The number of significant SNPs in REF (older bulls) was about four times higher compare to VAL (younger bulls) though both had similar sample sizes, 2,219 and 2,039 respectively. A total of 424 SNP-trait combinations on 22 chromosomes showed genome-wide significant association involving 284 unique SNPs in the COMB dataset. In the REF data set 101 associations (73 unique SNPs) and in the VAL 24 associations (18 unique SNPs) were found genome-wide significant. Sixty-eight percent of the SNPs in the REF dataset could be confirmed in the VAL dataset. Out of 469 unique SNPs showing chromosome-wide significant association with calving traits in the REF dataset 321 could be confirmed in the VAL dataset at P < 0.05.

Conclusions

The follow-up study for GWAS in cattle will depend on the aim of the study. If the aim is to discover novel QTL, analyses of the COMB dataset is recommended, while in case of identification of the causal mutation underlying a QTL, confirmation of the discovered SNPs are necessary to avoid following a false positive.

【 授权许可】

   
2012 Höglund et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Witte JS, Elston RC, Cardon LR: On the relative sample size required for multiple comparisons. Stat Med 2000, 19:369-372.
• [2]Thomas DC, Haile RW, Duggan D: Recent developments in genome wide association scans: a workshop summary and review. Am J Hum Genet 2005, 77:337-345.
• [3]NCI-NHGRI Working Group on Replication in Association Studies: Replicating genotype-phenotype association. Nature 2007, 447:655-660.
• [4]Sørensen AC, Sørensen MK, Berg P: Inbreeding in Danish Dairy Cattle Breeds. J Dairy Sci 2005, 88:1865-1872.
• [5]Guldbrandtsen B, Höglund JK, Lund MS, Sahana G: Analyzing follow-up studies to genome wide association studies. In Proceedings of the Ninth World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production: 1-6 August 2010. CD-ROM communication no. 0765, Leipzig, Germany;
• [6]Sahana G, Guldbrandtsen B, Lund MS: Genome-wide association study for calving traits in Danish and Swedish Holstein cattle. J Dairy Sci 2011, 94:479-486.
• [7]Danish Cattle Federation: Principles of Danish Cattle Breeding. 2006. http://www.lr.dk/kvaeg/diverse/principles.pdf webcite
• [8]Boelling D, Sander Nielsen U, Pösö J, Eriksson J-Å, Aamand GP: Genetic evaluation of calving traits in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden. Interbull Bull 2007, 37:179-184.
• [9]Pedersen J, Sørensen MK, Toivonen M, Eriksson J, Aamand GP: Report on economic basis for a Nordic total merit index. http://www.nordicebv.info/NR/rdonlyres/BFC1E284-4DC9-4E7C-96F6-F7A6EA0CDF6B/0/NAV_TMI_Light_report.pdf webcite
• [10]Kemper KE, Emery DL, Bishop SC, Oddy H, Hayes BJ, Dominik S, Henshall JM, Goddard ME: The distribution of SNP marker effects for faecal worm egg count in sheep, and the feasibility of using these markers to predict genetic merit for resistance to worm infections. Genet Res 2011, 93:203-219.
• [11]Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y: Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological) 1995, 57:289-300.
• [12]Sun YV, Jacobsen DM, Kardia SLR: ChromoScan: A Scan Statistic Application for Identifying Chromosomal Regions in Genomic Studies. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:2945-2947.
• [13]Cole JB, Van Raden PM, O’Connel JR, Van Tassel CP, Sonstegard TS, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Wiggans GR: Distribution and location of genetic effects for dairy traits. J Dairy Sci 2009, 92:2931-2946.
• [14]Thomasen JR, Guldbrandtsen B, Sørensen P, Thomsen B, Lund MS: Quantitattive trait loci affecting calving traits in Danish Holstein cattle. J Dairy Sci 2008, 91:2098-2105.
• [15]Brand B, Baes C, Mayer M, Reinsch N, Seidenspinner T, Thaller G, Kühn C: Quantitative trait loci mapping of calving and conformation traits on Bos Taurus autosome 18 in the German Holstein population. J Diary Sci 2010, 93:1205-1215.
• [16]Schulman NF, Sahana G, Lund MS, Viitala SM, VIlkki JH: Quantitative trait loci for fertility traits in Finnish Ayrshire cattle. Genet Sel Evol 2008, 40:195-214.
• [17]Seidenspinner T, Bennewitz J, Reinhardt F, Thaller G: Need for sharp phenotypes in QTL detection for calving traits in dairy cattle. J Anim Breed Genet 2009, 126:455-462.
• [18]Holmberg M, Andersson-Eklund L: Quantitative Trait Loci affecting Fertility and Calving Traits in Swedish Dairy Cattle. J Dairy Sci 2006, 89:3664-3671.
• [19]Olsen HG, Hayes BJ, Kent MP, Nome T, Svendsen M, Lien S: A genome wide association study for QTL affecting direct and maternal effects of stillbirth and dystocia in cattle. Anim Genet 2010, 41:273-280.