The increase of vasomotor tone avoids the ability of the dynamic preload indicators to estimate fluid responsiveness

BMC Anesthesiology

Juan P Bouchacourt²  Juan A Riva²  Juan C Grignola¹ 

[1] Department of Pathophysiology, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Avda Italia 2870, PC 11600, Montevideo, Uruguay

[2] Department of Anesthesia, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Avda Italia 2870, PC 11600, Montevideo, Uruguay

关键词: Phenylephrine;    Vasomotor tone;    Stroke volume variation;    Pulse pressure variation;    Preload dynamic indices;    Polar plot;   

Others  :  816683
DOI  :  10.1186/1471-2253-13-41

 received in 2013-04-25, accepted in 2013-11-05,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

The use of vasoconstrictor can affect the dynamic indices to predict fluid responsiveness. We investigate the effects of an increase of vascular tone on dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness in a rabbit model of hemorrhage, and to examine the ability of the arterial pressure surrogates dynamic indices to track systolic volume variation (SVV) during hypovolemia under increased vasomotor tone.

Methods

Eighteen anesthetized and mechanically ventilated rabbits were studied during normovolemia (BL) and after blood progressive removal (15 mL/kg, BW). Other two sets of data were obtained during PHE infusion with normovolemia (BL + PHE) and during hypovolemia (BW + PHE). We measured central venous and left ventricular (LV) pressures and infra diaphragmatic aortic blood flow (AoF) and pressure. Pulse pressure variation (PPV), systolic pressure variation (SPV) and SVV were estimated manually by the variation of beat-to-beat PP, SP and SV, respectively. We also calculated PPV_apnea as 100 × (PP_max-PP_min)/PP during apnea. The vasomotor tone was estimated by total peripheral resistance (TPR = mean aortic pressure/mean AoF), dynamic arterial elastance (Ea_dyn = PPV/SVV) and arterial compliance (C = SV/PP). We assessed LV preload by LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP). We compared the trending abilities between SVV and pressure surrogate indices using four-quadrant plots and polar plots.

Results

Baseline PPV, SPV, PPV_apnea, and SVV increased significantly during hemorrhage, with a decrease of AoF (P < 0.05). PHE induced significant TPR and Ea_dyn increase and C decrease in bled animals, and a further decrease in AoF with a significant decrease of all dynamic indices. There was a significant correlation between SVV and PPV, PPV_apnea and SPV in normal vasomotor tone (r² ≥ 0.5). The concordance rate was 91%, 95% and 76% between SVV and PPV, PPV_apnea and SPV, respectively, in accordance with the polar plot analysis. During PHE infusion, there was no correlation between SVV and its surrogates, and both four-quadrant plot and polar plot showed poor trending.

Conclusion

In this animal model of hemorrhage and increased vasomotor tone induced by phenylephrine the ability of dynamic indices to predict fluid responsiveness seems to be impaired, masking the true fluid loss. Moreover, the arterial pressure surrogates have not the reliable trending ability against SVV.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Bouchacourt et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Gan TJ, Soppitt A: Maroof M, el-Moalem H, Robertson KM, Moretti E, Dwane P, Glass PS: Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery. Anesthesiology 2002, 97:820-826.
• [2]Lopes MR, Oliveira MA, Pereira VSO, Lemos IPB, Auler JOC Jr, Michard F: Goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high-risk surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 2007, 11:R100. BioMed Central Full Text
• [3]Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preoperative hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2011, 112:1392-1402.
• [4]Michard F, Teboul JL: Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002, 121:2000-2008.
• [5]Renner J, Scholz J, Bein B: Monitoring fluid therapy. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2009, 23:159-171.
• [6]Cannesson M: Arterial pressure variation and goal-directed fluid therapy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2010, 24:487-497.
• [7]Mesquida J, Kim HK, Pinsky MR: Effect of tidal volume, intrathoracic pressure, and cardiac contractility on variations in pulse pressure, stroke volume, and intrathoracic blood volume. Intensive Care Med 2011, 37:1672-1679.
• [8]Perel A, Pizov R, Cotov S: Systolic blood pressure variation is a sensitive indicator of hypovolemia in ventilated dogs subjected to graded hemorrhage. Anesthesiology 1987, 67:498-502.
• [9]Berkenstadt H, Friedman Z, Preisman S, Keidan I, Livingstone D, Perel A: Pulse pressure and stroke volume variations during severe haemorrhage in ventilated dogs. Br J Anesth 2005, 96:721-726.
• [10]Michard F: Stroke volume variation: from applied physiology to improved outcomes. Crit Care Med 2011, 39:402-403.
• [11]Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A: Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. A systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009, 37:2642-2647.
• [12]Lansdorp B, Lemson J, van Putten MJAM, de Keijzer A, van der Hoeven JG, Pickkers P: Dynamic indices do not predict volume responsiveness in routine clinical practice. Br J Anesth 2012, 108:395-401.
• [13]Nouira S, Elatrous S, Dimassi S, Besbes L, Boukef R, Mohamed B, Abroug F: Effects of norepinephrine on static and dynamic preload indicators in experimental hemorrhagic shock. Crit Care Med 2005, 33:2339-2343.
• [14]Renner J, Meybohm P, Hanss R, Gruenewald M, Scholz J, Bein B: Effects of norepinephrine on dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness during hemorrhage and after resuscitation in a pediatric porcine model. Pediatric Anesth 2009, 19:688-694.
• [15]Kubitz JC, Forkl S, Annecke T, Kronas N, Goetz AE, Reuter DA: Systolic pressure variation and pulse pressure variation during modifications of arterial pressure. Intensive Care Med 2008, 34:1520-1524.
• [16]Sakka SG, Becher L, Kozieras J, van Hout N: Effects of changes in blood pressure and airway pressures on parameters of fluid responsiveness. Eur J Anesth 2009, 26:322-327.
• [17]Wajima Z, Shiga T, Imanaga K, Inoue T: Do induced hypertension and hypotension affect stroke volume variation in man? J Clin Anesth 2012, 24:207-211.
• [18]Hadian M, Severyn DA, Pinsky MR: The effects of vasoactive drugs on pulse pressure and stroke volume variation in postoperative ventilated patients. J Crit Care 2011, 26:328. e1–e8
• [19]Hummler HD, Pohlandt F, Franz AR: Pulse oximetry during low perfusion caused by emerging pneumonia and sepsis in rabbits. Crit Care Med 2002, 30:2501-2508.
• [20]Chemla D, Hebert JL, Coirault C, Zamani K, Suard I, Colin P, Lecarpentier Y: Total arterial compliance estimated by stroke volume-to-aortic pulse pressure ratio in humans. Am J Physiol 1998, 274:H500-H505.
• [21]Pinsky MR: Heart lung interactions during mechanical ventilation. Curr Opin Crit Care 2012, 18:256-260.
• [22]Whitley E, Ball J: Statistics review 4: sample size calculations. Crit Care 2002, 6:335-341. BioMed Central Full Text
• [23]Critchley LA, Yang XX, Lee A: Assessment of trending ability of cardiac output monitors by polar plot methodology. J Cardioth Vasc Anesth 2011, 25:536-546.
• [24]Critchley LA, Critchley JA: A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth Analg 2010, 111:1180-1192.
• [25]Monnet X, Anguel N, Naudin B, Jabot J, Richard C, Teboul JL: Arterial pressure-based cardiac output in septic patients: different accuracy of pulse contour and uncalibrated pressure waveform devices. Crit Care 2010, 14:R109. BioMed Central Full Text
• [26]Meng L, Phuong Tran N, Alexander BS, Laning K, Chen G, Kain ZN, Cannesson M: The impact of phenylephrine, ephedrine, and increased preload on third-generation Vigileo-FloTrac and esophageal doppler cardiac output measurements. Anesth Analg 2011, 113:751-757.
• [27]Critchley LA, Peng ZY, Fok BS, Lee A, Phillips RA: Testing the reliability of a new ultrasonic cardiac output monitor, the USCOM, by using aortic flowprobes in anesthetized dogs. Anesth Analg 2005, 100:748-753.
• [28]Bia D, Barra JG, Grignola JC, Gines FF, Armentano RL: Pulmonary artery smooth muscle activation attenuates arterial dysfunction during acute pulmonary hypertension. J Appl Physiol 2005, 98:605-613.
• [29]Thiele RH, Nemergut EC, Lynch C III: The physiologic implications of isolated alfa1 adrenergic stimulation. Anesth Analg 2011, 113:284-296.
• [30]Magder S: Phenylephrine and tangible bias. Anesth Analg 2011, 113:211-213.
• [31]Magder S: Bench-to-bedside review: an approach to hemodynamic monitoring-Guyton at the bedside. Crit Care 2012, 16:236. BioMed Central Full Text
• [32]Cannesson M, Jian Z, Chen G, Vu TQ, Hatib F: Effects of phenylephrine on cardiac output and venous return depend on the position of the heart on the Frank-Starling relationship. J Appl Physiol 2012, 113:281-289.
• [33]Monnet X, Guerin L, Jozwiak M, Bataille A, Julien F, Richard C, Teboul JL: Pleth variability index is a weak predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients receiving norepinephrine. Br J Anesth 2013, 110:207-213.
• [34]Monnet X, Letierce A, Hamzaoui O, Chemla D, Anguel N, Osman D, Richard C, Teboul JL: Arterial pressure allows monitoring the changes in cardiac output induced by volume expansion but not by norepinephrine. Crit Care Med 2011, 39:1394-1399.
• [35]Natalini G, Rosano A, Rocco Militano C, Di Maio A, Ferretti P, Bertelli M, de Giuli F, Bernardini A: Prediction of arterial pressure increase after fluid challenge. BMC Anesthesiology 2012, 12:3. BioMed Central Full Text
• [36]Lamia B, Chemla D, Richard C, Teboul JL: Clinical review: interpretation of arterial pressure wave in shock states. Crit Care 2005, 9:601-606. BioMed Central Full Text
• [37]Westerhof N, Stergiopulos N, Noble MIM: Snapshots of hemodynamics. 2nd edition. New York: Springer; 2010.