Production of bacterial cellulose and enzyme from waste fiber sludge

Biotechnology for Biofuels

Adnan Cavka¹  Xiang Guo²  Shui-Jia Tang²  Sandra Winestrand¹  Leif J Jönsson¹  Feng Hong² 

[1] Department of Chemistry, Umeå University, Umeå, SE-901 87, Sweden

[2] Group of Microbiological Engineering and Industrial Biotechnology, College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Donghua University, Shanghai, 201620, China

关键词: Fiber sludge;    Trichoderma reesei;    Cellulase;    Enzyme production;    Gluconacetobacter xylinus;    Bacterial cellulose;   

Others  :  798146
DOI  :  10.1186/1754-6834-6-25

 received in 2012-09-05, accepted in 2013-02-14,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Bacterial cellulose (BC) is a highly crystalline and mechanically stable nanopolymer, which has excellent potential as a material in many novel applications, especially if it can be produced in large amounts from an inexpensive feedstock. Waste fiber sludge, a residue with little or no value, originates from pulp mills and lignocellulosic biorefineries. A high cellulose and low lignin content contributes to making the fiber sludge suitable for bioconversion, even without a thermochemical pretreatment step. In this study, the possibility to combine production of BC and hydrolytic enzymes from fiber sludge was investigated. The BC was characterized using field-emission scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction analysis, and its mechanical properties were investigated.

Results

Bacterial cellulose and enzymes were produced through sequential fermentations with the bacterium Gluconacetobacter xylinus and the filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei. Fiber sludges from sulfate (SAFS) and sulfite (SIFS) processes were hydrolyzed enzymatically without prior thermochemical pretreatment and the resulting hydrolysates were used for BC production. The highest volumetric yields of BC from SAFS and SIFS were 11 and 10 g/L (DW), respectively. The BC yield on initial sugar in hydrolysate-based medium reached 0.3 g/g after seven days of cultivation. The tensile strength of wet BC from hydrolysate medium was about 0.04 MPa compared to about 0.03 MPa for BC from a glucose-based reference medium, while the crystallinity was slightly lower for BC from hydrolysate cultures. The spent hydrolysates were used for production of cellulase with T. reesei. The cellulase activity (CMCase activity) in spent SAFS and SIFS hydrolysates reached 5.2 U/mL (87 nkat/mL), which was similar to the activity level obtained in a reference medium containing equal amounts of reducing sugar.

Conclusions

It was shown that waste fiber sludge is a suitable raw material for production of bacterial cellulose and enzymes through sequential fermentation. The concept studied offers efficient utilization of the various components in fiber sludge hydrolysates and affords a possibility to combine production of two high value-added products using residual streams from pulp mills and biorefineries. Cellulase produced in this manner could tentatively be used to hydrolyze fresh fiber sludge to obtain medium suitable for production of BC in the same biorefinery.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Cavka et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Bielecki S, Krystynowicz A, Turkiewicz M, Kalinowska H: Bacterial cellulose. In Biopolymers (Polysaccharides I: Polysaccharides from Prokaryotes). Volume 5. Edited by Vandamme J, Baets SD, Steinbüchel A. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag; 2002:37-90.
• [2]Nakagaito AN, Iwamoto S, Yano H: Bacterial cellulose: the ultimate nano-scalar cellulose morphology for the production of high-strength composites. Appl Phys A: Mater Sci Process 2005, 80:93-97.
• [3]Gardner DJ, Oporto GS, Mills R, Azizi Samir MAS: Adhesion and surface issues in cellulose and nanocellulose. J Adhes Sci Technol 2008, 22:545-567.
• [4]Klemm D, Schumann D, Kramer F, Heßler N, Hornung M, Schmauder HP, Marsch S: Nanocelluloses as innovative polymers in research and application. Adv Polym Sci 2006, 205:49-96.
• [5]Czaja WK, Young DJ, Kawecki M, Brown RM Jr: The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8:1-12.
• [6]Petersen N, Gatenholm P: Bacterial cellulose-based materials and medical devices: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2011, 91:1277-1286.
• [7]Jiang G, Qiao J, Hong F: Application of phosphoric acid and phytic acid doped bacterial cellulose as novel proton-conducting membranes to PEMFC. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37:9182-9192.
• [8]Gao QY, Shen XY, Lu XK: Regenerated bacterial cellulose fibers prepared by the NMMO·H2O process. Carbohyd Polym 2011, 83:1253-1256.
• [9]Hong F, Qiu K: An alternative carbon source from konjac powder for enhancing production of bacterial cellulose in static cultures by a model strain Acetobacter aceti subsp. xylinus ATCC 23770. Carbohyd Polym 2008, 72:545-549.
• [10]Hong F, Zhu YX, Yang G, Yang XX: Wheat straw acid hydrolysate as a potential cost-effective feedstock for production of bacterial cellulose. J Chem Technol Biot 2011, 86:675-680.
• [11]Chen L, Hong F, Yang X, Han S: Biotransformation of wheat straw to bacterial cellulose and its mechanism. Bioresource Technol 2012.
• [12]Hong F, Guo X, Zhang S, Han S-F, Yang G, Jönsson LJ: Bacterial cellulose production from cotton-based waste textiles: enzymatic saccharification enhanced by ionic liquid pretreatment. Bioresource Technol 2012, 104:503-508.
• [13]Keshk SMAS, Sameshima K: Evaluation of different carbon sources for bacterial cellulose production. Afr J Biotechnol 2005, 4:478-482.
• [14]Thompson DN, Hamilton MA: Production of bacterial cellulose from alternate feedstocks. Appl Biochem Biotech 2001, 91–93:503-513.
• [15]Ishihara M, Matsunaga M, Hayashi N, Tišler V: Utilization of D-xylose as carbon source for production of bacterial cellulose. Enzyme Microb Tech 2002, 31:986-991.
• [16]Dahman Y, Jayasuriya KE, Kalis M: Potential of biocellulose nanofibers production from agricultural renewable resources: preliminary study. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2010, 162:1647-1659.
• [17]Ross P, Mayer R, Benziman M: Cellulose biosynthesis and function in bacteria. Microbiol Rev 1991, 55:35-58.
• [18]Alriksson B, Rose SH, van Zyl WH, Jönsson LJ: Cellulase production from spent lignocellulosic hydrolysates with recombinant Aspergillus niger. Appl Environ Microb 2009, 75:2366-2374.
• [19]Cavka A, Alriksson B, Rose SH, van Zyl WH, Jönsson LJ: Biorefining of wood: combined production of ethanol and xylanase from waste fiber sludge. J Ind Microbiol Biot 2011, 38:891-899.
• [20]Shin CS, Lee JP, Lee JS, Park SC: Enzyme production of Trichoderma reesei Rut C-30 on various lignocellulosic substrates. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2000, 84–86:237-245.
• [21]Szengyel Z, Zacchi G, Réczey K: Cellulase production based on hemicellulose hydrolysate from steam-pretreated willow. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 1997, 63–65:351-362.
• [22]Szengyel Z, Zacchi G, Vartam A, Réczey K: Cellulase production of Trichoderma reesei Rut C-30 using steam-pretreated spruce. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2000, 84–86:679-691.
• [23]Vogel HJ: Distribution of lysine pathways among fungi: evolutionary implications. Am Naturalist 1964, 98:435-446.
• [24]Bailey MJ, Biely P, Poutanen K: Interlaboratory testing of methods for assay of xylanase activity. J Biotechnol 1992, 23:257-270.
• [25]Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW: NIH Image to Image J: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 2012, 9:671-675.
• [26]Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad CM: An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Textile Res J 1959, 29:786-794.