Reconstruction of dual-frequency conductivity by optimization of phase map in MREIT and MREPT

BioMedical Engineering OnLine

Oh In Kwon²  Woo Chul Jeong¹  Saurav Z K Sajib¹  Hyung Joong Kim¹  Eung Je Woo¹  Tong In Oh¹ 

[1] Department of Biomedical Engineering and Impedance Imaging Research Center, Kyung Hee University, 446-701 Yongin, Korea

[2] Department of Mathematics, Konkuk University, 143-701 Seoul, Korea

关键词: Optimization;    Magnetic flux density;    Conductivity;    MREPT;    MREIT;    MRI;   

Others  :  797148
DOI  :  10.1186/1475-925X-13-24

 received in 2013-11-12, accepted in 2014-02-25,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

The spectroscopic conductivity distribution of tissue can help to explain physiological and pathological status. Dual frequency conductivity imaging by combining Magnetic Resonance Electrical Property Tomography (MREPT) and Magnetic Resonance Electrical Impedance Tomography (MREIT) has been recently proposed. MREIT can provide internal conductivity distributions at low frequency (below 1 kHz) induced by an external injecting current. While MREPT can provide conductivity at the Larmor frequency related to the strength of the magnetic field. Despite this potential to describe the membrane properties using spectral information, MREPT and MREIT techniques currently suffer from weak signals and noise amplification as they both reply on differentiation of measured phase data.

Methods

We proposed a method to optimize the measured phase signal by finding weighting factors according to the echo signal for MREPT and MREIT using the ICNE (Injected current nonlinear encoding) multi-echo pulse sequence. Our target weights are chosen to minimize the measured noise. The noise standard deviations were precisely analyzed for the optimally weighted magnetic flux density and the phase term of the positive-rotating magnetic field. To enhance the quality of dual-frequency conductivity images, we applied the denoising method based on the reaction-diffusion equation with the estimated noise standard deviations. A real experiment was performed with a hollow cylindrical object made of thin insulating film with holes to control the apparent conductivity using ion mobility and an agarose gel cylinder wrapped in an insulating film without holes to show different spectroscopic conductivities.

Results

The ability to image different conductivity characteristics in MREPT and MREIT from a single MR scan was shown by including the two objects with different spectroscopic conductivities. Using the six echo signals, we computed the optimized weighting factors for each echo. The qualities of conductivity images for MREPT and MREIT were improved by optimization of the phase map. The proposed method effectively reduced the random noise artifacts for both MREIT and MREPT.

Conclusion

We enhanced the dual conductivity images using the optimally weighted magnetic flux density and the phase term of positive-rotating magnetic field based on the analysis of the noise standard deviations and applying the optimization and denoising methods.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Kwon et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Geddes LA, Baker LE: The specific resistance of biological material—a compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist. Med Biol Eng 1967, 5(3):271-293.
• [2]Gabriel S, Lau RW, Gabriel C: The dielectric properties of biological tissues: Ii. measurements in the frequency range 10 hz to 20 ghz. Phys Med Biol 1996, 41(11):2251-2269.
• [3]Holder DS: Electrical Impedance Tomography: Methods, History and Applications. Bristol, UK: IOP Publishing; 2005.
• [4]Ider YZ, Birgul O: Use of the magnetic field generated by the internal distribution of injected currents for electrical impedance tomography (mr-eit). Elektrik 1998, 6(3):215-225.
• [5]Kwon O, Woo EJ, Yoon J-R, Seo JK: Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (mreit): simulation study of j-substitution algorithm. Biomed Eng, IEEE Trans 2002, 49(2):160-167.
• [6]Birgül Ö, Eyüboglu BM, Ider YZ: Current constrained voltage scaled reconstruction (ccvsr) algorithm for mr-eit and its performance with different probing current patterns. Phys Med Biol 2003, 48(5):653-671.
• [7]Ider YZ, Onart S, Lionheart WRB: Uniqueness and reconstruction in magnetic resonance–electrical impedance tomography (mr–eit). Physiol Meas 2003, 24(2):591-604.
• [8]Joy MLG: Mr current density and conductivity imaging: the state of the art. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS. San Francisco, CA, USA; 1–5 September 2004:5315-5319.
• [9]Muftuler LT, Hamamura M, Birgul O, Nalcioglu O: Resolution and contrast in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (mreit) and its application to cancer imaging. Technol Cancer Res & Treat 2004, 3(6):599-609.
• [10]Ödemir MS, Eyüboğlu BM, Öbek O: Equipotential projection-based magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography and experimental realization. Phys Med Biol 2004, 49(20):4765-4783.
• [11]Seo JK, Pyo HC, Park C, Kwon O, Woo EJ: Image reconstruction of anisotropic conductivity tensor distribution in mreit: computer simulation study. Phys Med Biol 2004, 49(18):4371-4382.
• [12]Gao N, Zhu SA, He B: A new magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (mreit) algorithm: the rsm-mreit algorithm with applications to estimation of human head conductivity. Phys Med Biol 2006, 51(12):3067-3083.
• [13]Birgul O, Hamamura MJ, Muftuler LT, Nalcioglu O: Contrast and spatial resolution in mreit using low amplitude current. Phys Med Biol 2006, 51(19):5035-5049.
• [14]Hamamura MJ, Muftuler LT, Birgul O, Nalcioglu O: Measurement of ion diffusion using magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography. Phys Med Biol 2006, 51(11):2753-2762.
• [15]Katscher U, Voigt T, Findeklee C, Vernickel P, Nehrke K, Dossel O: Determination of electric conductivity and local sar via b1 mapping. Med Imaging, IEEE Trans 2009, 28(9):1365-1374.
• [16]Voigt T, Katscher U, Doessel O: Quantitative conductivity and permittivity imaging of the human brain using electric properties tomography. Magn Reson Med 2011, 66(2):456-466.
• [17]Seo JK, Kim M-O, Lee J, Choi N, Woo EJ, Kim HJ, Kwon OI, Kim D-H: Error analysis of nonconstant admittivity for mr-based electric property imaging. Med Imaging, IEEE Trans 2012, 31(2):430-437.
• [18]Lee BI, Oh SH, Woo EJ, Lee SY, Cho MH, Kwon O, Seo JK, Baek WS: Static resistivity image of a cubic saline phantom in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (mreit). Physiol Meas 24(2):579-589.
• [19]Seo JK, Yoon J-R, Woo EJ, Kwon O: Reconstruction of conductivity and current density images using only one component of magnetic field measurements. Biomed Eng, IEEE Trans 2003, 50(9):1121-1124.
• [20]Ider YZ, Onart S: Algebraic reconstruction for 3d magnetic resonance–electrical impedance tomography (mreit) using one component of magnetic flux density. Physiol Meas 2004, 25(1):281-294.
• [21]Hamamura MJ, Muftuler LT: Fast imaging for magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography. Magn Reson Imaging 2008, 26(6):739-745.
• [22]Sajib SZK, Kim HJ, Kwon OI, Woo EJ: Regional absolute conductivity reconstruction using projected current density in mreit. Phys Med Biol 2012, 57(18):5841-5859.
• [23]Kim HJ, Jeong WC, Sajib SZK, Kim MO, Kwon OI, Woo EJ, Kim DH: Simultaneous imaging of dual-frequency electrical conductivity using a combination of mreit and mrept. Magn Reson Med 2014, 71(1):200-208.
• [24]Park C, Lee BI, Kwon O, Woo EJ: Measurement of induced magnetic flux density using injection current nonlinear encoding (icne) in mreit. Physiol Meas 2007, 28(2):117-127.
• [25]Nam HS, Kwon OI: Optimization of multiply acquired magnetic flux density b z using icne-multiecho train in mreit. Phys Med Biol 2010, 55(9):2743-2759.
• [26]Minhas AS, Jeong WC, Kim YT, Han Y, Kim HJ, Woo EJ: Experimental performance evaluation of multi-echo icne pulse sequence in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography. Magn Reson Med 2011, 66(4):957-965.
• [27]Scott GC, Joy MLG, Armstrong RL, Henkelman RM: Sensitivity of magnetic-resonance current-density imaging. J Magn Reson (1969) 1992, 97(2):235-254.
• [28]Sadleir R, Grant S, Zhang SU, Lee BI, Pyo HC, Oh SH, Park C, Woo EJ, Lee SY, Kwon O, Seo JK: Noise analysis in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography at 3 and 11 t field strengths. Physiol Meas 2005, 26(5):875-884.
• [29]Rudin LI, Osher S: Total variation based image restoration with free local constraints. In Proceedings of the First IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. Austin, Texas; 13–16 November 1994:31-35.
• [30]Perona P, Malik J: Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. Pattern Anal Machine Intell, IEEE Trans 1990, 12(7):629-639.
• [31]Oh TI, Kim YT, Minhas A, Seo JK, Kwon OI, Woo EJ: Ion mobility imaging and contrast mechanism of apparent conductivity in mreit. Phys Med Biol 2011, 56(7):2265-2277.
• [32]Park C, Lee BI, Kwon OI: Analysis of recoverable current from one component of magnetic flux density in mreit and mrcdi. Phys Med Biol 2007, 52(11):3001-3013.
• [33]Oh TI, Koo H, Lee KH, Kim SM, Lee J, Kim SW, Seo JK, Woo EJ: Validation of a multi-frequency electrical impedance tomography (mfeit) system khu mark1: impedance spectroscopy and time-difference imaging. Physiol Meas 2008, 29(3):295.