期刊论文详细信息
BioMedical Engineering OnLine
Optimization of magnetic flux density for fast MREIT conductivity imaging using multi-echo interleaved partial fourier acquisitions
Eung Je Woo2  Oh In Kwon1  Hyung Joong Kim2  Woo Chul Jeong2  Munish Chauhan2 
[1]Department of Mathematics, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea
[2]Department of Biomedical Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin, Korea
关键词: Current density;    Magnetic flux density;    Interleaved partial fourier acquisition;    MRI;    MREIT;   
Others  :  797397
DOI  :  10.1186/1475-925X-12-82
 received in 2013-06-19, accepted in 2013-08-21,  发布年份 2013
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) has been introduced as a non-invasive method for visualizing the internal conductivity and/or current density of an electrically conductive object by externally injected currents. The injected current through a pair of surface electrodes induces a magnetic flux density distribution inside the imaging object, which results in additional magnetic flux density. To measure the magnetic flux density signal in MREIT, the phase difference approach in an interleaved encoding scheme cancels out the systematic artifacts accumulated in phase signals and also reduces the random noise effect by doubling the measured magnetic flux density signal. For practical applications of in vivo MREIT, it is essential to reduce the scan duration maintaining spatial-resolution and sufficient contrast. In this paper, we optimize the magnetic flux density by using a fast gradient multi-echo MR pulse sequence. To recover the one component of magnetic flux density Bz, we use a coupled partial Fourier acquisitions in the interleaved sense.

Methods

To prove the proposed algorithm, we performed numerical simulations using a two-dimensional finite-element model. For a real experiment, we designed a phantom filled with a calibrated saline solution and located a rubber balloon inside the phantom. The rubber balloon was inflated by injecting the same saline solution during the MREIT imaging. We used the multi-echo fast low angle shot (FLASH) MR pulse sequence for MRI scan, which allows the reduction of measuring time without a substantial loss in image quality.

Results

Under the assumption of a priori phase artifact map from a reference scan, we rigorously investigated the convergence ratio of the proposed method, which was closely related with the number of measured phase encode set and the frequency range of the background field inhomogeneity. In the phantom experiment with a partial Fourier acquisition, the total scan time was less than 6 seconds to measure the magnetic flux density Bz data with 128×128 spacial matrix size, where it required 10.24 seconds to fill the complete k-space region.

Conclusion

Numerical simulation and experimental results demonstrated that the proposed method reduces the scanning time and provides the recovered Bz data comparable to what we obtained by measuring complete k-space data.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Chauhan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20140706054311194.pdf 2679KB PDF download
Figure 8. 72KB Image download
Figure 8. 72KB Image download
Figure 8. 72KB Image download
Figure 8. 72KB Image download
Figure 8. 72KB Image download
Figure 8. 72KB Image download
Figure 8. 72KB Image download
Figure 7. 68KB Image download
Figure 7. 68KB Image download
Figure 7. 68KB Image download
Figure 7. 68KB Image download
Figure 7. 68KB Image download
Figure 7. 68KB Image download
Figure 7. 68KB Image download
Figure 6. 44KB Image download
Figure 6. 44KB Image download
Figure 5. 128KB Image download
Figure 5. 128KB Image download
Figure 5. 128KB Image download
Figure 5. 128KB Image download
Figure 5. 128KB Image download
Figure 4. 25KB Image download
Figure 4. 25KB Image download
Figure 3. 46KB Image download
Figure 3. 46KB Image download
Figure 3. 46KB Image download
Figure 3. 46KB Image download
Figure 3. 46KB Image download
Figure 3. 46KB Image download
Figure 3. 46KB Image download
Figure 3. 46KB Image download
Figure 3. 46KB Image download
Figure 2. 22KB Image download
Figure 1. 17KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Joy MLG, Scott GC, Henkelman RM: In vivo detection of applied electric currents by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imag 1989, 7:89-94.
  • [2]Scott GC, Joy MLG, Armstrong RL, Henkelman RM: Measurement of nonuniform current density by magnetic resonance. IEEE Trans Med Imag 1991, 10:362-374.
  • [3]Ider YZ, Birgul O: Use of the magnetic field generated by the internal distribution of injected currents for Electrical Impedance Tomography (MR-EIT). Elektrik 1998, 6:215-225.
  • [4]Eyuboglu M, Birgul O, IY Z: A dual modality system for high resolution-true conductivity imaging. Proc. XI Int. Conf. Electrical Bioimpedance (ICEBI) 2001, 409-413.
  • [5]Birgul O, Eyuboglu BM, Ider YZ: Current constrained voltage scaled reconstruction (CCVSR) algorithm for MR-EIT and its performance with different probing current patterns. Phys Med Biol 2003, 48:653-671.
  • [6]Kwon O, Woo EJ, Yoon JR, Seo JK: Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): simulation study of J-substitution algorithm. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2002, 48:160-167.
  • [7]Kim YJ, Kwon O, Seo JK, Woo EJ: Uniqueness and convergence of conductivity image reconstruction in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography. Inverse Probl 2003, 19:1213-1225.
  • [8]Ider YZ, Onart S, Lionheart WRB: Uniqueness and reconstruction in magnetic resonance-electrical impedance tomography(MR-EIT). Physiol Meas 2003, 24:591-604.
  • [9]Muftuler L, Hamamura M, Birgul O, Nalcioglu O: Resolution and contrast in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) and its application to cancer imaging. Tech Cancer Res Treat 2004, 3:599-609.
  • [10]Ozdemir M, Eyuboglu BM, Ozbek O: Equipotential projection-based magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography and experimental realization. Phys Med Biol 2004, 49:4765-4783.
  • [11]Seo JK, Yoon JR, Woo EJ, Kwon O: Reconstruction of conductivity and current density images using only one component of magnetic field measurements. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2003, 50:1121-1124.
  • [12]Oh SH, Lee BI, Woo EJ, Lee SY, Cho MH, Kwon O, Seo JK: Conductivity and current density image reconstruction using harmonic Bz algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography. Phys Med Biol 2003, 48:3101-3116.
  • [13]Park C, Kwon O, Woo EJ, Seo JK: Electrical conductivity imaging using gradient Bz decomposition algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT). IEEE Trans Med Imag 2004, 23:388-394.
  • [14]Joy MLG: MR current density and conductivity imaging: the state of the art. In Proc. 26th Ann. Int. Conf. IEEE EMBS. San Francisco; 2004:5315-5319.
  • [15]Lee BI, Lee SH, Kim TS, Kwon O, Woo EJ, Seo JK: Harmonic decomposition in PDE-based denoising technique for magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2005, 52:1912-1920.
  • [16]Oh SH, Lee BI, Woo EJ, Lee SY, Kim TS, Kwon O, Seo JK: Electrical conductivity images of biological tissue phantoms in MREIT. Physiol Meas 2005, 26:S279-S288.
  • [17]Gao N, Zhu SA, He BA: New magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) algorithm: the RSM-MREIT algorithm with applications to estimation of human head conductivity. Phys Med Biol 2006, 51:3067-3083.
  • [18]Birgul O, Hamamura M, Muftuler L, Nalcioglu O: Contrast and spatial resolution in MREIT using low amplitude current. Phys Med Biol 2006, 51:5035-5049.
  • [19]Kim HJ, Oh TI, Kim YT, Lee BI, Woo EJ, Seo JK, Lee SY, Kwon O, Park C, Kang BT, Park HM: In vivo electrical conductivity imaging of a canine brain using a 3 T MREIT system. Physiol Meas 2008, 29:1145-1155.
  • [20]Kim HJ, Kim YT, Minhas AS, Jeong WC, Woo EJ, Seo JK, Kwon OJ: In Vivo high-resolution conductivity imaging of the human leg using MREIT: the first human experiment. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2009, 99:160-167.
  • [21]Woo EJ, Seo JK: Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) for high-resolution conductivity imaging. Physiol Meas 2008, 29:R1-R26.
  • [22]Hamamura M, Muftuler L: Fast imaging for magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography. Magn Reson Imaging 2008, 26:739-745.
  • [23]Muftuler L, Chen G, Hamamura M, Ha SH: MREIT with SENSE acceleration using a dedicated RF coil design. Physiol Meas 2009, 30:913-929.
  • [24]Park HM, Nam HS, Kwon O: Magnetic flux density reconstruction using interleaved partial Fourier acquisitions in MREIT. Phys Med Biol 2011, 56:2059-2073.
  • [25]Scott GC, Joy MLG, Armstrong RL, Henkelman RM: Sensitivity of magnetic resonance current density imaging. J Magn Reson 1992, 97:235-254.
  • [26]Sadleir R, Grant S, Zhang SU, Lee BI, Pyo HC, Oh SH, Park C, Woo EJ, Lee SY, Kwon O, Seo JK: Noise analysis in MREIT at 3 and 11 Tesla field strength. Physiol Meas 2005, 26:875-884.
  • [27]Nam H, Kwon O: Optimization of multiply acquired magnetic flux density Bz using ICNE-Multiecho train in MREIT. Phys Med Biol 2010, 55:2743-2759.
  • [28]Park C, Lee BI, Kwon O, Woo EJ: Measurement of induced magnetic flux density using injection current nonlinear encoding (ICNE) in MREIT. Physiol Meas 2007, 28:117-127.
  • [29]Woo EJ: Functional brain imaging using MREIT and EIT: Requirements and feasibility. 8th Int. Conf. on Bioelectromagnetism 2011, 131-134.
  • [30]Sadleir RJ, Grant SC, Woo EJ: Can high-field MREIT be used to directly detect neural activity? Theoretical considerations. Neuroimage 2010, 52:205-216.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:215次 浏览次数:12次