期刊论文详细信息
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
Effect of ketotifen premedication on adverse reactions during peanut oral immunotherapy
Amanda Jagdis4  Noam Berlin1  Carly Barron2  Mohana Giruparajah2  Nathan Leader5  Sean Maclachlan3  Gordon L Sussman4 
[1] Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Gordon Sussman Clinical Research Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 202 St Clair Ave W, Toronto, ON M4V 1R2, Canada
[5] Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
关键词: Adverse reactions;    Desensitization;    Ketotifen;    Antihistamine premedication;    Oral immunotherapy;    Peanut allergy;   
Others  :  1082142
DOI  :  10.1186/1710-1492-10-36
 received in 2014-04-07, accepted in 2014-06-27,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Oral immunotherapy (OIT) has shown promise in inducing desensitization for food allergy. However, there are safety concerns regarding the frequency and severity of adverse events during food OIT.

Objective

To evaluate the effect of Ketotifen premedication on adverse reactions during peanut OIT.

Methods

A randomized single blind placebo controlled pilot study was performed. Peanut OIT was performed using a previously published protocol. Ketotifen was up-titrated to 2 mg twice daily over two weeks (week -2 to 0), followed by a peanut OIT initial escalation day (day 1). Ketotifen was administered from week 0–4 of peanut OIT; reactions to peanut OIT doses were recorded by clinic staff and subject diary.

Results

Six subjects (median age 10 years, peanut IgE >100kUA/L) were enrolled, 4 randomized to Ketotifen, 2 to placebo. The most common side effect of Ketotifen was fatigue (9% during up-titration). The rate of reaction per peanut OIT dose was lower for subjects on ketotifen (K) compared to placebo (P) during initial escalation on day 1 (K: 22% (8/36) vs. P: 67% (12/18)); week 0–4 build-up doses (K: 75% (3/4) vs. P: 100% (2/2)); and week 0–4 home doses (K: 50% (54/108) vs. P: 82% (27/33)). The rate of gastrointestinal symptoms per peanut OIT dose was also lower for subjects on ketotifen during initial escalation on day 1 (K: 17% (6/36) vs. P: 61% (11/18)); week 0–4 build-up doses (K: 75% (3/4) vs P: 100% (2/2)); and week 0–4 home doses (K: 46% (50/108) vs. P: 82% (27/33)).

Conclusions

Ketotifen premedication is well tolerated and reduces the rate of gastrointestinal symptoms during peanut OIT. These findings require confirmation in a larger study of Ketotifen premedication used throughout peanut OIT.

Trial registration

Clinical Trials number: NCT0162515

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Jagdis et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20141204123934413.pdf 455KB PDF download
Figure 1. 42KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Sicherer SH, Muñoz-Furlong A, Godbold JH, Sampson HA: US prevalence of self-reported peanut, tree nut, and sesame allergy: 11-year follow-up. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010, 125, 6:1322-1326.
  • [2]Fleischer DM, Conover-Walker MK, Christie L, Burks AW, Wood RA: The natural progression of peanut allergy: resolution and the possibility of recurrence. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003, 112, 1:183-189.
  • [3]Neuman-Sunshine DL, Eckman JA, Keet CA, Matsui EC, Peng RD, Lenehan PJ, Wood RA: The natural history of persistent peanut allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2012, 108, 5:326-331.
  • [4]Bock SA, Muñoz-Furlong A, Sampson HA: Fatalities due to anaphylactic reactions to foods. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2001, 107, 1:191-193.
  • [5]Flokstra-de Blok BMJ, Dubois AE, Vlieg-Boerstra BJ, Oude Elberink JN, Raat H, DunnGalvin A, Hourihane JO, Duiverman EJ: Health-related quality of life of food allergic patients: comparison with the general population and other diseases. Allergy 2010, 65:238-244.
  • [6]Nelson HS, Lahr J, Rule R, Bock A, Leung D: Treatment of anaphylactic sensitivity to peanuts by immunotherapy with injections of aqueous peanut extract. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997, 99, 6, Pt 1:744-751.
  • [7]Oppenheimer JJ, Nelson HS, Bock SA, Christensen F, Leung DY: Treatment of peanut allergy with rush immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1992, 90, 2:256-262.
  • [8]Sheikh A, Nurmatov U, Venderbosch I, Bischoff E: Oral immunotherapy for the treatment of peanut allergy: systematic review of six case series studies. Prim Care Respir J 2013, 21, 1:41-49.
  • [9]Varshney P, Jones SM, Scurlock AM, Perry TT, Kemper A, Steele P, Hiegel A, Kamilaris J, Carlisle S, Yue X, Kulis M, Pons L, Vickery B, Burks AW: A randomized controlled study of peanut oral immunotherapy: clinical desensitization and modulation of the allergic response. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011, 127, 3:654-660.
  • [10]Nurmatov U, Venderbosch I, Devereux G, Simons FE, Sheikh A: Allergen-specific oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013, 12, 9:CD009014.
  • [11]Hofmann AM, Scurlock AM, Jones SM, Palmer KP, Lokhnygina Y, Steele PH, Kamilaris J, Burks AW: Safety of a peanut oral immunotherapy protocol in children with peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009, 124, 2:286-291.
  • [12]Brockow K, Kiehn M, Riethmüller C, Vieluf D, Berger J, Ring J: Efficacy of antihistamine pretreatment in the prevention of adverse reactions to Hymenoptera immunotherapy: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997, 100, 4:458-463.
  • [13]Müller UR, Jutel M, Reimers A, Zumkehr J, Huber C, Kriegel C, Steiner U, Haeberli G, Akdis M, Helbling A, Schnyder B, Blaser K, Akdis C: Clinical and immunologic effects of H1 antihistamine preventive medication during honeybee venom immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008, 122, 5:1001-1007.
  • [14]MacDonald GF: An overview of ketotifen. Chest 1982, 82:30S-32S.
  • [15]Kabra SK, Pandey RM, Singh R, Seth V: Ketotifen for asthma in children aged 5 to 15 years: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2000, 85, 1:46-52.
  • [16]Melamed I, Feanny SJ, Sherman PM, Roifman CM: Benefit of ketotifen in patients with eosinophilic gastroenteritis. Am J Med 1991, 90, 3:310-314.
  • [17]Czarnetzki BM: A double-blind, crossover study of the effect of ketotifen in urticaria pigmentosa. Dermatologica 1983, 166:44-47.
  • [18]St-Pierre JP, Kobric M, Rackham A: Effect of ketotifen treatment on cold-induced urticaria. Ann Allergy 1985, 55, 6:840-843.
  • [19]Abelson MB, Chapin MJ, Kapik BM, Shams NB: Efficacy of ketotifen fumarate 0.025% ophthalmic solution compared with placebo in the conjunctival allergen challenge model. Arch Ophthalmol 2003, 121, 5:626-630.
  • [20]Berdy GJ, Spangler DL, Bensch G, Berdy SS, Brusatti RC: A comparison of the relative efficacy and clinical performance of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and ketotifen fumarate 0.025% ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival antigen challenge model. Clin Ther 2000, 22, 7:826-833.
  • [21]Kettelhut BV, Berkebile C, Bradley D, Metcalfe DD: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of ketotifen versus hydroxyzine in the treatment of pediatric mastocytosis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1989, 83, 5:866-870.
  • [22]Schwarzer G, Bassler D, Mitra A, Ducharme FM, Forster J: Ketotifen alone or as additional medication for long-term control of asthma and wheeze in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004, 1:CD001384.
  • [23]Jones SM, Pons L, Roberts JL, Scurlock AM, Perry TT, Kulis M, Shreffler WG, Steele P, Henry KA, Adair M, Francis JM, Durham S, Vickery BP, Zhong X, Burks AW: Clinical efficacy and immune regulation with peanut oral immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009, 124, 2:292-300.
  • [24]Sampson HA, Munoz-Furlong A, Campbell RL, Adkinson NF Jr, Bock SA, Branum A, Brown SG, Camargo CA Jr, Cydulka R, Galli SJ, Gidudu J, Gruchalla RS, Harlor AD Jr, Hepner DL, Lewis LM, Lieberman PL, Metcalfe DD, O'Connor R, Muraro A, Rudman A, Schmitt C, Scherrer D, Simons FE, Thomas S, Wood JP, Decker WW: Second symposium on the definition and management of anaphylaxis: summary report—Second National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease/Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network symposium. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006, 117:391-397.
  • [25]Bolukbas FF, Bolukbas C, Uzunkoy A, Baba F, Horoz M, Ozturk E: A dramatic response to ketotifen in a case of eosinophilic gastroenteritis mimicking abdominal emergency. Dig Dis Sci 2004, 49, 11–12:1782-1785.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:46次 浏览次数:18次