Animal Biotelemetry | |
Juvenile salmonid migratory behavior at the mouth of the Columbia River and within the plume | |
Geoffrey A McMichael1  Amanda C Hanson1  Ryan A Harnish1  Donna M Trott1  | |
[1] Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, PO Box 999, MISN K6-85, Richland, WA 99352, USA | |
关键词: JSATS; Survival; Ocean; Migration; Salmonid; Plume; Telemetry; | |
Others : 791044 DOI : 10.1186/2050-3385-1-14 |
|
received in 2013-03-11, accepted in 2013-08-15, 发布年份 2013 | |
【 摘 要 】
Background
Early ocean experience is a critical time period that affects juvenile salmonid survival. Understanding juvenile salmonid behavior in nearshore marine environments and how oceanic conditions (such as dynamic river plume habitats) affect salmonid migration will contribute to salmonid survival studies and conservation and management efforts. Relatively few studies have been conducted on juvenile salmonid behavior as they migrate out the mouth of the Columbia River and some studies suggest that juvenile salmonids typically migrate north immediately upon entry into the ocean from the Columbia River. We present findings from a study that used acoustic telemetry to determine the migratory direction, residence time, and travel rate of juvenile salmonids as they left the Columbia River and entered the marine environment.
Results
A total of 8,159 acoustic-tagged salmonid smolts were detected at the mouth of the Columbia River. Of the fish detected at the mouth, an estimated 16% of yearling Chinook salmon, 10% of steelhead, and 26% of subyearling Chinook salmon were detected on a sparse array deployed outside the mouth of the Columbia River in the vicinity of the plume. The travel rate of Chinook salmon smolts decreased as they left the river and entered the marine environment, whereas the travel rate of steelhead increased. Chinook salmon also spent more time in the transitional area between the river mouth and plume compared to steelhead. In early spring, yearling Chinook salmon and steelhead were predominately detected on the plume array towards the edge of the shelf and to the south. Later in the season, yearling Chinook salmon and steelhead smolts were more often detected north of the river mouth. Subyearling Chinook salmon were most often detected on the portion of the plume array to the north of the river mouth.
Conclusions
Our study showed that salmonid smolt migration out of the river into the nearshore marine environment appears to vary across species, season, and age class, and may be influenced by local environmental conditions. Direction of movement upon ocean entry cannot be assumed and is likely influenced by oceanic conditions such as wind and currents. We also present, for the first time, the utility of the Juvenile Salmon Acoustic Telemetry System (JSATS) to monitor the behavior of juvenile fish in the marine environment. Our results will help inform future studies using telemetry and hydroacoustics as well as trawl surveys to assess nearshore ocean juvenile salmonid distribution, behavior, and survival.
【 授权许可】
2013 McMichael et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
【 预 览 】
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
20140705005911230.pdf | 1755KB | download | |
Figure 8. | 61KB | Image | download |
Figure 7. | 95KB | Image | download |
Figure 6. | 88KB | Image | download |
Figure 5. | 94KB | Image | download |
Figure 4. | 88KB | Image | download |
Figure 3. | 94KB | Image | download |
Figure 2. | 93KB | Image | download |
Figure 1. | 50KB | Image | download |
【 图 表 】
Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.
Figure 8.
【 参考文献 】
- [1]Nehlsen W, Williams JE, Lichatowich JA: Pacific salmon at the crossroads: stocks at risk from California, Oregon, Idaho, and Washington. Fisheries 1991, 16:4-21.
- [2]Good TP, Waples RS, Adams P: Updated Status of Federally Listed ESUs of West Coast Salmon and Steelhead. Seattle, WA: NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-66 Northwest Fisheries Science Center; 2005:637.
- [3]Budy P, Thiede GP, Bouwes N, Petrosky CE, Schaller H: Evidence linking delayed mortality of Snake River salmon to their earlier hydrosystem experience. N Am J Fish Manage 2002, 22:35-51.
- [4]Kareiva P, Marvier M, McClure M: Recovery and management options for spring/summer Chinook salmon in the Columbia River Basin. Science 2000, 290:977-979.
- [5]Williams JG: Mitigating the effects of high-head dams on the Columbia River, USA: experience from the trenches. Hydrobiologia 2008, 609:241-251.
- [6]Emmett RL, Krutzikowsky GK, Bentley P: Abundance and distribution of pelagic piscivorous fishes in the Columbia River plume during spring/early summer 1998–2003: Relationship to oceanographic conditions, forage fishes, and juvenile salmonids. Prog Oceanogr 2006, 68:1-26.
- [7]Roby DD, Lyons DE, Craig DP, Collis K, Visser GH: Quantifying the effect of predators on endangered species using a bioenergetics approach: Caspian terns and juvenile salmonids in the Columbia River estuary. Can J Zool 2003, 81:250-265.
- [8]Schreck CB, Stahl TP, Davis LE, Roby DD, Clemens BJ: Mortality estimates of juvenile spring–summer Chinook salmon in the Lower Columbia River and estuary, 1992–1998: evidence for delayed mortality? Trans Am Fish Soc 2006, 135:457-475.
- [9]Kennedy BM, Gale WL, Ostrand KG: Relationship between smolt gill Na+, K + ATPase activity and migration timing to avian predation risk of steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in a large estuary. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 2007, 64:1506-1516.
- [10]Tiffan KF, Kock TJ, Haskell CA, Connor WP, Steinhorst RK: Water velocity, turbulence, and migration rate of subyearling fall chinook salmon in the free-flowing and impounded snake river. Trans Am Fish Soc 2009, 138:373-384.
- [11]Petrosky CE, Schaller HA: Influence of river conditions during seaward migration and ocean conditions on survival rates of Snake River Chinook salmon and steelhead. Ecol Freshw Fish 2010, 19:520-536.
- [12]McMichael GA, Skalski JR, Deters KA: Survival of juvenile Chinook salmon during barge transport. N Am J Fish Manage 2011, 31:1187-1196.
- [13]Muir WD, Smith SG, Williams JG, Sandford BP: Survival of juvenile salmonids passing through bypass systems, turbines, and spillways with and without flow deflectors at Snake River dams. N Am J Fish Manage 2001, 21:135-146.
- [14]Harnish RA, Johnson GE, McMichael GA, Hughes MS, Ebberts BD: Effect of migration pathway on travel time and survival of acoustic-tagged juvenile salmonids in the Columbia River estuary. Trans Am Fish Soc 2012, 141:507-519.
- [15]Drenner SM, Clark TD, Whitney CK, Martins EG, Cooke SJ, Hinch SG: A synthesis of tagging studies examining the behaviour and survival of anadromous salmonids in marine environments. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e31311.
- [16]McMichael GA, Harnish RA, Bellgraph BJ, Carter JA, Ham KD, Titzler PS, Hughes JS: Migratory Behavior and Survival of Juvenile Salmonids in the Lower Columbia River Estuary in 2009. Richland, WA: PNNL-19545 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; 2010.
- [17]Weitkamp LA, Bentley PJ, Litz MN: Seasonal and interannual variation in juvenile salmonids and associated fish assemblage in open waters of the lower Columbia River estuary. Fish Bull 2012, 110:426-450.
- [18]Chittenden CM, Jensen JLA, Ewart D, Anderson S, Balfry S, Downey E, Eaves A, Saksida S, Smith B, Vincent S, Welch D, McKinley RS: Recent salmon declines: a result of lost feeding opportunities due to bad timing? PLoS One 2010, 5:e12423.
- [19]Scheuerell MD, Zabel RW, Sandford BP: Relating juvenile migration timing and survival to adulthood in two species of threatened Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.). J Appl Ecol 2009, 46:983-990.
- [20]Bottom DL, Jones KK, Cornwell TJ, Gray A, Simenstad CA: Patterns of Chinook salmon migration and residency in the Salmon River estuary (Oregon). Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci 2005, 64:79-93.
- [21]Fresh KL, Casillas E, Johnson LL, Bottom DL: Role of the Estuary in the Recovery of Columbia River Basin Salmon and Steelhead: An Evaluation of the Effects of the Selected Factors on Salmonid Population Viability. Seattle, WA: NMFS-NWFSC-69 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA); 2005.
- [22]Melnychuk MC, Welch DW, Walters CJ: Spatio-temporal migration patterns of Pacific salmon smolts in rivers and coastal marine waters. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e12916.
- [23]Romer JD, Leblanc CA, Clements S, Ferguson JA, Kent ML, Noakes D, Schreck CB: Survival and behavior of juvenile steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in two estuaries in Oregon, USA. Environ Biol Fishes 2012, 96:849-863.
- [24]De Robertis A, Morgan CA, Schabetsberger RA, Zabel RW, Brodeur RD, Emmett RL, Knight CM, Krutzikowsky GK, Casillas E: Columbia River plume fronts. II. Distribution, abundance, and feeding ecology of juvenile salmon. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 2005, 299:33-44.
- [25]Schabetsberger R, Morgan CA, Brodeur RD, Potts CL, Peterson WT, Emmett RL: Prey selectivity and diel feeding chronology of juvenile chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and coho (O. kisutch) salmon in the Columbia River plume. Fish Oceanogr 2003, 12:523-540.
- [26]Beamish RJ, Mahnken C: A critical size and period hypothesis to explain natural regulation of salmon abundance and the linkage to climate and climate change. Prog Oceanogr 2001, 49:423-437.
- [27]Burla M, Baptista AM, Casillas E, Williams JG, Marsh DM: The influence of the Columbia River plume on the survival of steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha): a numerical exploration. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 2010, 67:1671-1684.
- [28]MacFarlane RB: Energy dynamics and growth of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) from the Central Valley of California during the estuarine phase and first ocean year. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 2010, 67:1549-1565.
- [29]Quinn TP: The Behavior and Ecology of Pacific Salmon and Trout. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press; 2005.
- [30]Hickey B, Geier S, Kachel N, MacFadyen AF: A bi-directional river plume: the Columbia in summer. Cont Shelf Res 2005, 25:1631-1656.
- [31]Hickey BM, Pietrafesa LJ, Jay DA, Boicourt WC: The Columbia River Plume study: subtidal variability in the velocity and salinity fields. J Geophys Res 1998, 103:10339-10368.
- [32]Kaltenberg AM, Emmett RL, Benoit-Bird KJ: Timing of forage fish seasonal appearance in the Columbia River plume and link to ocean conditions. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 2010, 419:171-184.
- [33]Peterson WT, Morgan CA, Fisher JP, Casillas E: Ocean distribution and habitat associations of yearling coho (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and Chinook (O. tshawytscha) salmon in the northern California Current. Fish Oceanogr 2010, 19:508-525.
- [34]Emmett RL, Brodeur RD, Orton PM: The vertical distribution of juvenile salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) and associated fishes in the Columbia River plume. Fish Oceanogr 2004, 13:392-402.
- [35]Rechisky EL, Welch DW, Porter AD, Jacobs MC, Ladouceur A: Experimental measurement of hydrosystem-induced delayed mortality in juvenile Snake River spring Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) using a large-scale acoustic array. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 2009, 66:1019-1024.
- [36]Rechisky EL, Welch DW, Porter AD, Jacobs-Scott MC, Winchell PM, McKern JL: Estuarine and early-marine survival of transported and in-river migrant Snake River spring Chinook salmon smolts. Sci Rep 2012., 2doi:10.1038/srep00448
- [37]Schreck CB, Karnowski MD, Clemens BJ: Evaluation of Post Release Losses and Barging Strategies that Minimize Post Release Mortality. Corvallis, OR: DACW68-00-C-0028 Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit; 2005.
- [38]McMichael GA, Eppard MB, Carlson T, Carter JA, Ebberts BD, Brown RS, Weiland M, Ploskey GR, Harnish RA, Deng ZD: The juvenile salmon acoustic telemetry system: a new tool. Fisheries 2010, 35:9-22.
- [39]Clements S, Stahl T, Schreck CB: A comparison of the behavior and survival of juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and steelhead trout (O. mykiss) in a small estuary system. Aquaculture 2012, 362–363:148-157.
- [40]Antolos M, Roby DD, Lyons DE, Collis K, Evans AE, Hawbecker M, Ryan BA: Caspian tern predation on juvenile salmonids in the mid-Columbia River. Trans Am Fish Soc 2005, 134:466-480.
- [41]Beeman JW, Maule AG: Migration depths of juvenile Chinook salmon and steelhead relative to total dissolved gas supersaturation in a Columbia river reservoir. Trans Am Fish Soc 2006, 135:584-594.
- [42]Collis K, Roby DD, Craig DP, Ryan BA, Ledgerwood RD: Colonial waterbird predation on juvenile salmonids tagged with passive integrated transponders in the Columbia river estuary: vulnerability of different salmonid species, stocks, and rearing types. Trans Am Fish Soc 2001, 130:385-396.
- [43]Pearcy WG, Fisher JP: Distribution and Abundance of Juvenile Salmonids off Oregon and Washington, 1981–1985. Seattle, WA: NMFS 93 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA); 1990.
- [44]Fisher J, Trudel M, Ammann A, Orsi JA, Piccolo J, Bucher C, Casillas E, Harding JA, MacFadyen AF, Brodeur RD, Morris JFT, Welch DW: Comparisons of the coastal distributions and abundances of juvenile Pacific salmon from central California to the northern Gulf of Alaska. In The Ecology of Juvenile Salmon in the Northeast Pacific Ocean: Regional Comparisons, Symposium 57. Edited by Grimes CB, Brodeur RD, Haldorson LJ, McKinnell SM. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society; 2007:31-80.
- [45]Bi HS, Ruppel RE, Peterson WT: Modeling the pelagic habitat of salmon off the Pacific Northwest (USA) coast using logistic regression. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 2007, 336:249-265.
- [46]Miller DR, Williams J, Sims CW: Distribution, Abundance, and Growth of Juvenile Salmonids off the Coast of Oregon and Washington, Summer 1980. Seattle, WA: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA); 1982.
- [47]Pearcy WG: Ocean Ecology of North Pacific Salmonids. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press; 1992.
- [48]Bowles AE, Denes SL, Shane MA: Acoustic characteristics of ultrasonic coded transmitters for fishery applications: could marine mammals hear them? J Acoust Soc Am 2010, 128:3223.
- [49]Cunningham KA, Hayes SA, Rub MW, Reichmuth C: High-frequency hearing in seals and sea lions and the implications for detection of ultrasonic coded transmitters. J Acoust Soc Am 2009, 2012:132.
- [50]Ward DL, Boyce RR, Young FR, Olney FE: A review and assessment of transportation studies for juvenile Chinook salmon in the Snake River. N Am J Fish Manage 1997, 17:652-662.
- [51]Summerfelt RC, Smith LS: Anesthesia, surgery and related techniques. In Methods for Fish Biology. Edited by Schreck CB, Moyle PB. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society; 1990:213-272.
- [52]Titzler PS, McMichael GA, Carter JA: Autonomous acoustic receiver deployment and mooring techniques for use in large rivers and estuaries. N Am J Fish Manage 2010, 30:853-859.
- [53]McMichael GA, Harnish RA, Skalski JR, Deters KA, Ham KD, Townsend RL, Titzler PS, Hughes JS, Kim J, Trott DM: Migratory Behavior and Survival of Juvenile Salmonids in the Lower Columbia River, Estuary, and Plume in 2010. Richland, WA: PNNL-20443 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; 2011.
- [54]Stewart RH, Joy JA: HF radio measurements of ocean surface currents. Deep Sea Res 1974, 21:1039-1049.
- [55]Barrick DE, Evans MW, Weber BL: Ocean surface currents mapped by radar. Science 1977, 198:138-144.