Effects of production and market factors on ethanol profitability for an integrated first and second generation ethanol plant using the whole sugarcane as feedstock

Biotechnology for Biofuels

Stefano Macrelli¹  Mats Galbe¹  Ola Wallberg¹ 

[1] Department of Chemical Engineering, Lund University, PO Box 124, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden

关键词: Sugarcane;    Production cost;    Minimum ethanol selling price;    Process simulation;    Process integration;    Sensitivity analysis;    Techno-economic analysis;    Second generation ethanol;    Cellulosic ethanol;   

Others  :  793572
DOI  :  10.1186/1754-6834-7-26

 received in 2013-10-10, accepted in 2014-02-06,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Sugarcane is an attractive feedstock for ethanol production, especially if the lignocellulosic fraction can also be treated in second generation (2G) ethanol plants. However, the profitability of 2G ethanol is affected by the processing conditions, operating costs and market prices. This study focuses on the minimum ethanol selling price (MESP) and maximum profitability of ethanol production in an integrated first and second generation (1G + 2G) sugarcane-to-ethanol plant. The feedstock used was sugarcane juice, bagasse and leaves. The lignocellulosic fraction was hydrolysed with enzymes. Yields were assumed to be 95% of the theoretical for each of the critical steps in the process (steam pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis (EH), fermentation, solid/liquid separation, anaerobic digestion) in order to obtain the best conditions possible for ethanol production, to assess the lowest production costs. Techno-economic analysis was performed for various combinations of process options (for example use of pentoses, addition of leaves), EH conditions (water-insoluble solids (WIS) and residence time), operating cost (enzymes) and market factors (wholesale prices of electricity and ethanol, cost of the feedstock).

Results

The greatest reduction in 2G MESP was achieved when using the pentoses for the production of ethanol rather than biogas. This was followed, in decreasing order, by higher enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency (EHE), by increasing the WIS to 30% and by a short residence time (48 hours) in the EH. The addition of leaves was found to have a slightly negative impact on 1G + 2G MESP, but the effect on 2G MESP was negligible. Sugarcane price significantly affected 1G + 2G MESP, while the price of leaves had a much lower impact. Net present value (NPV) analysis of the most interesting case showed that integrated 1G + 2G ethanol production including leaves could be more profitable than 1G ethanol, despite the fact that the MESP was higher than in 1G ethanol production.

Conclusions

A combined 1G + 2G ethanol plant could potentially outperform a 1G plant in terms of NPV, depending on market wholesale prices of ethanol and electricity. Therefore, although it is more expensive than 1G ethanol production, 2G ethanol production can make the integrated 1G + 2G process more profitable.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Macrelli et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union: Directive 2003/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 May 2003 on the Promotion of the Use of Biofuels or Other Renewable Fuels for Transport. Brussels; 2003.
• [2]The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union: Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources. Brussels; 2009.
• [3]The Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress: Energy Policy Act of 2005. Washington, DC; 2005. [http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-109publ58/html/PLAW-109publ58.htm webcite]
• [4]The Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress: Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. Washington, DC; 2007. [http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-110publ140/html/PLAW-110publ140.htm webcite]
• [5]Minister of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply, Brazil: Dispõe sobre a adição de álcool etílico anidro combustível à gasolina. Brasília; 2007. [Ordinance number 143 of 27.06.2007]
• [6]Galdos M, Cavalett O, Seabra JEA, Nogueira LAH, Bonomi A: Trends in global warming and human health impacts related to Brazilian sugarcane ethanol production considering black carbon emissions. Appl Energy 2013, 104:576-582.
• [7]García CA, Manzini F: Environmental and economic feasibility of sugarcane ethanol for the Mexican transport sector. Sol Energy 2012, 86:1063-1069.
• [8]Silalertruksa T, Gheewala SH: Long-term bioethanol system and its implications on GHG emissions: a case study of Thailand. Environ Sci Technol 2011, 45:4920-4928.
• [9]Leal MRLV, Nogueira LAH, Cortez LAB: Land demand for ethanol production. Appl Energy 2013, 102:266-271.
• [10]Bacovsky D, Ludwiczek N, Ognissanto M, Wörgetter M: Status of Advanced Biofuels Demonstration Facilities in 2012. In Status of Advanced Biofuels Demonstration Facilities in 2012: A Report to IEA Bioenergy Task 39. Ottawa, ON: IEA Bioenergy Task 39; 2013.
• [11]Balan V, Chiaramonti D, Kumar S: Review of US and EU initiatives toward development, demonstration, and commercialization of lignocellulosic biofuels. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 2013. doi:10.1002/bbb.1436
• [12](S&T)2 Consultants Inc: Second Generation Biofuels. A Review from a Market Barrier Perspective. Prepared for IEA Bioenergy Task 39. Liquid Biofuels from Biomass. Delta, BC: (S&T)2 Consultants Inc; 2006.
• [13]Tyner WE, Taheripour F, Perkis D: Comparison of fixed versus variable biofuels incentives. Energy Policy 2010, 38:5530-5540.
• [14]Li SZ, Chan-Halbrendt C: Ethanol production in China: Potential and technologies. Appl Energy 2009, 86:S162-S169.
• [15]Bajay SV, Nogueira LAH, de Sousa FJR: Ethanol in the Brazilian energy matrix. In Ethanol and Bioelectricity: Sugarcane in the Future Energy Matrix. Edited by de Sousa ELL, de Carvalho Macedo I. Sao Paulo: UNICA; 2011:260-308.
• [16]Dias MOS, Cunha MP, Jesus CDF, Rocha GJM, Pradella JGC, Rossell CEV, Maciel Filho R, Bonomi A: Second generation ethanol in Brazil: can it compete with electricity production? Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:8964-8971.
• [17]Khatiwada D, Seabra J, Silveira S, Walter A: Power generation from sugarcane biomass - A complementary option to hydroelectricity in Nepal and Brazil. Energy 2012, 48:241-254.
• [18]Chandel AK, da Silva SS, Carvalho W, Singh OV: Sugarcane bagasse and leaves: Foreseeable biomass of biofuel and bio-products. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2012, 87:11-20.
• [19]Pandey A, Soccol CR, Nigam P, Soccol VT: Biotechnological potential of agro-industrial residues. I: Sugarcane bagasse. Bioresour Technol 2000, 74:69-80.
• [20]Macrelli S, Mogensen J, Zacchi G: Techno-economic evaluation of 2nd generation bioethanol production from sugar cane bagasse and leaves integrated with the sugar-based ethanol process. Biotechnol Biofuels 2012, 5:22. BioMed Central Full Text
• [21]Galbe M, Zacchi G: Pretreatment: The key to efficient utilization of lignocellulosic materials. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 46:70-78.
• [22]Franco HCJ, Magalhães PSG, Cavalett O, Cardoso TF, Braunbeck OA, Bonomi A, Trivelin PCO: How Much Trash to Removal from Sugarcane Field to Produce Bioenergy?. Campos do Jordão: 1st Brazilian BioEnergy Science and Technology Conference; 2011.
• [23]CaneBioFuel: WorkPackage 4: Fermentability & Process Integration. [http://cordis.europa.eu/projects/227464 webcite]
• [24]CaneBioFuel: WorkPackage 4: Deliverable 4.1. [http://cordis.europa.eu/projects/227464 webcite]
• [25]Rabelo SC, Filho RM, Costa AC: A comparison between lime and alkaline hydrogen peroxide pretreatments of sugarcane bagasse for ethanol production. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2008, 148:45-58.
• [26]Ferreira-Leitão V, Perrone CC, Rodrigues J, Franke APM, MacRelli S, Zacchi G: An approach to the utilisation of CO2as impregnating agent in steam pretreatment of sugar cane bagasse and leaves for ethanol production. Biotechnol Biofuels 2010, 3:7. BioMed Central Full Text
• [27]Geddes CC, Peterson JJ, Roslander C, Zacchi G, Mullinnix MT, Shanmugam KT, Ingram LO: Optimizing the saccharification of sugar cane bagasse using dilute phosphoric acid followed by fungal cellulases. Bioresour Technol 2010, 101:1851-1857.
• [28]Sassner P, Galbe M, Zacchi G: Techno-economic evaluation of bioethanol production from three different lignocellulosic materials. Biomass Bioenergy 2008, 32:422-430.
• [29]Hoyer K, Galbe M, Zacchi G: Production of fuel ethanol from softwood by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation at high dry matter content. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2009, 84:570-577.
• [30]Jørgensen H, Vibe-Pedersen J, Larsen J, Felby C: Liquefaction of lignocellulose at high-solids concentrations. Biotechnol Bioeng 2007, 96:862-870.
• [31]Tengborg C, Galbe M, Zacchi G: Influence of enzyme loading and physical parameters on the enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-pretreated softwood. Biotechnol Prog 2001, 17:110-117.
• [32]Rudolf A, Baudel H, Zacchi G, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Lidén G: Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of steam-pretreated bagasse using Saccharomyces cerevisiae TMB3400 and Pichia stipitis CBS6054. Biotechnol Bioeng 2008, 99:783-790.
• [33]Carrasco C, Baudel HM, Sendelius J, Modig T, Roslander C, Galbe M, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Zacchi G, Lidén G: SO2-catalyzed steam pretreatment and fermentation of enzymatically hydrolyzed sugarcane bagasse. Enzym Microb Technol 2010, 46:64-73.
• [34]Parachin NS, Bergdahl B, van Niel EWJ, Gorwa-Grauslund MF: Kinetic modelling reveals current limitations in the production of ethanol from xylose by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng 2011, 13:508-517.
• [35]Ensinas AV, Nebra SA, Lozano MA, Serra LM: Analysis of process steam demand reduction and electricity generation in sugar and ethanol production from sugarcane. Energy Convers Manag 2007, 48:2978-2987.
• [36]Wingren A, Galbe M, Zacchi G: Energy considerations for a SSF-based softwood ethanol plant. Bioresour Technol 2008, 99:2121-2131.
• [37]Ensinas AV, Nebra SA, Lozano MA, Serra L: Design of evaporation systems and heaters networks in sugar cane factories using a thermoeconomic optimization procedure. Int J Thermodyn 2007, 10:97-105.
• [38]Sassner P, Zacchi G: Integration options for high energy efficiency and improved economics in a wood-to-ethanol process. Biotechnol Biofuels 2008, 1:4. BioMed Central Full Text
• [39]Dias MOS, Da Cunha MP, MacIel Filho R, Bonomi A, Jesus CDF, Rossell CEV: Simulation of integrated first and second generation bioethanol production from sugarcane: comparison between different biomass pretreatment methods. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2011, 38:955-966.
• [40]Furlan FF, Costa CBB, Fonseca GDC, Soares RDP, Secchi AR, Cruz AJGD, Giordano RDC: Assessing the production of first and second generation bioethanol from sugarcane through the integration of global optimization and process detailed modeling. Comput Chem Eng 2012, 43:1-9.
• [41]Laser M, Schulman D, Allen SG, Lichwa J, Antal MJ Jr, Lynd LR: A comparison of liquid hot water and steam pretreatments of sugar cane bagasse for bioconversion to ethanol. Bioresour Technol 2002, 81:33-44.
• [42]Diedericks D, van Rensburg E, Görgens JF: Enhancing sugar recovery from sugarcane bagasse by kinetic analysis of a two-step dilute acid pretreatment process. Biomass Bioenergy 2013, 57:149-160.
• [43]Pitarelo AP, Da Silva TA, Peralta-Zamora PG, Ramos LP: Effect of moisture content in the steam treatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse. Quím Nova 2012, 35:1502-1509.
• [44]Rocha GJM, Martín C, da Silva VFN, Gómez EO, Gonçalves AR: Mass balance of pilot-scale pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse by steam explosion followed by alkaline delignification. Bioresour Technol 2012, 111:447-452.
• [45]Cannella D, Jørgensen H: Do new cellulolytic enzyme preparations affect the industrial strategies for high solids lignocellulosic ethanol production? Biotechnol Bioeng 2014, 111:59-68.
• [46]Benjamin Y, Cheng H, Görgens JF: Evaluation of bagasse from different varieties of sugarcane by dilute acid pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis. Ind Crop Prod 2013, 51:7-18.
• [47]Wingren A, Galbe M, Zacchi G: Techno-economic evaluation of producing ethanol from softwood: Comparison of SSF and SHF and identification of bottlenecks. Biotechnol Prog 2003, 19:1109-1117.
• [48]Olofsson K, Sibbesen O, Andersen TV, Rønnow B: Rapid xylose and glucose fermentation by engineered S. cerevisiae for commercial production of cellulosic ethanol. In poster presented at conference Advanced Biofuels in a Biorefinery Approach, Copenhagen; 2012. [http://www.terranol.com/downloads/Advanced_Biofuels_in_a_Biorefinery_Approach_in_Copenhagen_2012_Terranol_Poster.pdf webcite]
• [49]Demeke MM, Dumortier F, Li Y, Broeckx T, Foulquié-Moreno MR, Thevelein JM: Combining inhibitor tolerance and D-xylose fermentation in industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient lignocellulose-based bioethanol production. Biotechnol Biofuels 2013, 6:120. BioMed Central Full Text
• [50]España-Gamboa EI, Mijangos-Cortés JO, Hernández-Zárate G, Maldonado JAD, Alzate-Gaviria LM: Methane production by treating vinasses from hydrous ethanol using a modified UASB reactor. Biotechnol Biofuels 2012, 5:82. BioMed Central Full Text
• [51]Rabelo SC, Carrere H, Maciel Filho R, Costa AC: Production of bioethanol, methane and heat from sugarcane bagasse in a biorefinery concept. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:7887-7895.
• [52]Molina F, Ruiz-Filippi G, García C, Roca E, Lema JM: Winery effluent treatment at an anaerobic hybrid USBF pilot plant under normal and abnormal operation. Water Sci Technol 2007, 56:25-31.
• [53]Sanchez Riera F, Cordoba P, Sineriz F: Use of the UASB reactor for the anaerobic treatment of stillage from sugar cane molasses. Biotechnol Bioeng 1985, 27:1710-1716.
• [54]Canebiofuel: Task 3.4. [http://cordis.europa.eu/projects/227464 webcite]
• [55]Novozymes: Advanced Biofuels Becoming Reality with Novozymes’ New Enzyme Technology. Bagsværd: Novozymes; 2012. [http://www.novozymes.com/en/news/news-archive/Pages/Advanced-biofuels-becoming-reality-with-Novozymes-new-enzyme-technology.aspx webcite]
• [56]CEPEA: Ethanol price. [http://www.cepea.esalq.usp.br webcite]
• [57]CaneBioFuel: Compositional analysis. [http://cordis.europa.eu/projects/227464 webcite]