Trace element and temperature effects on microbial communities and links to biogas digester performance at high ammonia levels

Biotechnology for Biofuels

Maria Westerholm¹  Bettina Müller¹  Simon Isaksson¹  Anna Schnürer¹ 

[1] Department of Microbiology, Uppsala BioCenter, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, 750 07, Sweden

关键词: Hydrogen;    VFA;    mcrA;    Methanogens;    fhs;    Acetogens;    Syntrophic acetate-oxidising bacteria;   

Others  :  1227732
DOI  :  10.1186/s13068-015-0328-6

 received in 2015-01-28, accepted in 2015-08-26,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

High levels of ammonia and the presence of sulphide have major impacts on microbial communities and are known to cause operating problems in anaerobic degradation of protein-rich material. Operating strategies that can improve process performance in such conditions have been reported. The microbiological impacts of these are not fully understood, but their determination could help identify important factors for balanced, efficient operation. This study investigated the correlations between microbial community structure, operating parameters and digester performance in high-ammonia conditions.

Method

Continuous anaerobic co-digestion of household waste and albumin was carried out in laboratory-scale digesters at high ammonia concentrations (0.5–0.9 g NH ₃ /L). The digesters operated for 320 days at 37 or 42 °C, with or without addition of a trace element mixture including iron (TE). Abundance and composition of syntrophic acetate-oxidising bacteria (SAOB) and of methanogenic and acetogenic communities were investigated throughout the study using 16S rRNA and functional gene-based molecular methods.

Results

Syntrophic acetate oxidation dominated methane formation in all digesters, where a substantial enhancement in digester performance and influence on microbial community by addition of TE was shown dependent on temperature. At 37 °C, TE addition supported dominance and strain richness of Methanoculleus bourgensis and altered the acetogenic community, whereas the same supplementation at 42 °C had a low impact on microbial community structure. Both with and without TE addition operation at 42 °C instead of 37 °C had low impact on digester performance, but considerably restricted acetogenic and methanogenic community structure, evenness and richness. The abundance of known SAOB was higher in digesters without TE addition and in digesters operating at 42 °C. No synergistic effect on digester performance or microbial community structure was observed on combining increased temperature with TE addition.

Conclusions

Our identification of prominent populations related to enhanced performance within methanogenic (high dominance and richness of M. bourgensis) and acetogenic communities are valuable for continued research and engineering to improve methane production in high-ammonia conditions. We also show that a temperature increase of only 5 °C within the mesophilic range results in an extreme dominance of one or a few species within these communities, independent of TE addition. Furthermore, functional stable operation was possible despite low microbial temporal dynamics, evenness and richness at the higher temperature.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Westerholm et al.

【 图 表 】

Fig.1.

Fig. 4.

Fig.3.

Figure 4.

Fig.5.

Fig.6.

Fig.1.

Figure 2.

Fig.3.

Fig.4.

Fig.5.

Fig.6.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Ek AEW, Hallin S, Vallin L, Schnürer A, Karlsson M (2011) Slaughterhouse waste co-digestion—Experiences from 15 years of full-scale operation. In: Proceeding of the World Renewable Energy Congress; 8–13 May 2011; Linköping, Sweden. Moshfegh B (ed). Bioenergy Technol 64–71
• [2]Moestedt J, Nilsson Påledal S, Schnürer A, Nordell E: Biogas production from thin stillage on an industrial scale—experience and optimisation. Energies 2013, 6:5642-5655.
• [3]Kovács E, Wirth R, Maróti G, Bagi Z, Nagy K, Minárovits J, Rákhely G, Kovács KL: Augmented biogas production from protein-rich substrates and associated metagenomic changes. Bioresour Technol 2015, 178:254-261.
• [4]Kayhanian M: Ammonia inhibition in high-solids biogasification: an overview and practical solutions. Environ Technol 1999, 20:355-365.
• [5]Ahring BK: Perspectives for anaerobic digestion. In Advances in Biochemical engineering/biotechnology—biomethanation I. Edited by Scheper T. Springer, Berlin; 2003:1-30.
• [6]Chen Y, Cheng JJ, Creamer KS: Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresour Technol 2008, 99:4044-4064.
• [7]Rajagopal R, Massé DI, Singh G: A critical review on inhibition of anaerobic digestion process by excess ammonia. Bioresour Technol 2013, 143:632-641.
• [8]van der Veen A, Fermoso FG, Lens PNL: Bonding form analysis of metals and sulfur fractionation in methanol-grown anaerobic granular sludge. Eng Life Sci 2007, 7:480-489.
• [9]Morris BEL, Henneberger R, Huber H, Moissl-Eichinger C: Microbial syntrophy: interaction for the common good. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2013, 37:384-406.
• [10]Angelidaki I, Ahring BK: Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of livestock waste: the effect of ammonia. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1993, 38:560-564.
• [11]Koster IW, Lettinga G: The influence of ammonium-nitrogen on the specific activity of pelletized methanogenic sludge. Agric Wastes 1984, 9:205-216.
• [12]Sprott GD, Patel GB: Ammonia toxicity in pure cultures of methanogenic bacteria. Syst Appl Microbiol 1986, 7:358-363.
• [13]Steinhaus B, Garcis AQ, Shen LT, Angenent A: A portable anaerobic microbioreactor reveals optimum growth conditions for the methanogen Methanosaeta concilii. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007, 73:1653-1658.
• [14]Zeeman G, Wiegant WM, Koster-Treffers ME, Lettinga G: The influence of the total ammonia concentration on the thermophilic digestion of cow manure. Agric Wastes 1985, 14:19-35.
• [15]Angenent LT, Sung S, Raskin L: Methanogenic population dynamics during startup of a full-scale anaerobic sequencing batch reactor treating swine waste. Water Res 2002, 36:4648-4654.
• [16]Schnürer A, Nordberg A: Ammonia, a selective agent for methane production by syntrophic acetate oxidation at mesophilic temperature. Water Sci Technol 2008, 57:735-740.
• [17]Schnürer A, Zellner G, Svensson BH: Mesophilic syntrophic acetate oxidation during methane formation in biogas reactors. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 1999, 29:249-261.
• [18]Shimada T, Morgenroth E, Tandukar M, Pavlostathis SG, Smith A, Raskin L, Kilian RE: Syntrophic acetate oxidation in two-phase (acid-methane) anaerobic digesters. Water Sci Technol 2011, 64:1812-1820.
• [19]Sun L, Müller B, Westerholm M, Schnürer A: Syntrophic acetate oxidation in industrial CSTR biogas digesters. J Biotechnol 2014, 171:39-44.
• [20]Westerholm M, Levén L, Schnürer A: Bioaugmentation of syntrophic acetate-oxidising culture in biogas reactors exposed to increasing levels of ammonia. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012, 78:7619-7625.
• [21]Hattori S, Galushko AS, Kamagata Y, Schink B: Operation of the CO dehydrogenase/acetyl coenzyme A pathway in both acetate oxidation and acetate formation by the syntrophically acetate-oxidizing bacterium Thermacetogenium phaeum. J Bacteriol 2005, 187:3471-3476.
• [22]Müller B, Sun L, Schnürer A: First insights into the syntrophic acetate-oxidizing bacteria—a genetic study. Microbiologyopen 2012, 2:35-53.
• [23]Schnürer A, Svensson BH, Schink B: Enzyme activities in and energetics of acetate metabolism by the mesophilic syntrophically acetate-oxidizing anaerobe Clostridium ultunense. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1997, 154:331-336.
• [24]Westerholm M, Roos S, Schnürer A: Tepidanaerobacter acetatoxydans sp. nov., an anaerobic, syntrophic acetate-oxidizing bacterium isolated from two ammonium-enriched mesophilic methanogenic processes. Syst Appl Microbiol 2011, 34:260-266.
• [25]Hattori S: Syntrophic acetate-oxidizing microbes in methanogenic environments. Microbes Environ 2008, 23:118-127.
• [26]Westerholm M (2012) Biogas production through the syntrophic acetate-oxidising pathway—characterisation and detection of syntrophic acetate-oxidising bacteria. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Microbiology
• [27]Banks CJ, Zhang Y, Jiang Y, Heaven S: Trace elements requirements for stable food waste digestion at elevated ammonia concentrations. Bioresour Technol 2012, 104:127-135.
• [28]Moestedt J, Nordell E, Schnürer A: Comparison of operational strategies for increased biogas production from thin stillage. J Biotechnol 2014, 175:22-30.
• [29]Karlsson A, Einarsson P, Schnürer A, Eljertsson J, Svensson BH: Impact of trace element addition on degradation efficiency of volatile fatty acids, oleic acid and phenyl acetate and on microbial populations in a biogas digester. J Biosci Bioeng 2012, 114:446-452.
• [30]Jarell KF, Kalmokoff ML: Nutritional requirements of the methanogenic archaebacteria. Can J Microbiol 1988, 34:557-576.
• [31]Schattauer A, Abdoun E, Weiland P, Plöchl M, Heiermann M: Abundance of trace elements in demonstration biogas plants. Biosyst Eng 2011, 108:57-65.
• [32]Whitman WB, Bowen TL, Boone DR: The methanogenic bacteria. Prokaryotes 2006, 3:165-207.
• [33]Westerholm M, Müller B, Arthurson V, Schnürer A: Changes in the acetogenic population in a mesophilic anaerobic digester in response to increasing ammonia concentration. Microbes Environ 2011, 26:347-353.
• [34]Fotidis IA, Karakashev D, Angelidaki I: The dominant acetate degradation pathway/methanogenic composition in full-scale anaerobic digesters operating under different ammonia levels. Int J Environ Sci Technol 2014, 11:2087-2094.
• [35]Westerholm M, Dolfing J, Sherry A, Gray ND, Head IM, Schnürer A: Quantification of syntrophic acetate-oxidizing microbial communities in biogas processes. Environ Microbiol Rep 2011, 3:500-505.
• [36]Feng XM, Karlsson A, Svensson BH, Bertilsson S: Impact of trace element addition on biogas production from food industrial waste—linking process to microbial communities. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2010, 74:226-240.
• [37]Zhang L, Lee Y, Jahng D: Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and piggery wastewater: Focusing on the role of trace elements. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:5048-5059.
• [38]Gustavsson J, Svensson BH, Karlsson A: The feasibility of trace element supplementation for stable operation of wheat stillage-fed biogas tank reactors. Water Sci Technol 2011, 64:320-325.
• [39]Müller N, Worm P, Schink B, Stams AJM, Plugge CM: Syntrophic butyrate and propionate oxidation processes: from genomes to reaction mechanisms. Environ Microbiol 2010, 2:489-499.
• [40]de Bok FAM, Hagedoorn PL, Silva PJ, Hagen WR, Schiltz E, Fritsche K, Stams AJM: Two W-containing formate dehydrogenases (CO 2 -reductases) involved in syntrophic propionate oxidation by Syntrophobacter fumaroxidans. Eur J Biochem 2003, 270:2476-2485.
• [41]Worm P, Fermoso FG, Stams AJM, Lens PNL, Plugge CM: Transcription of fdh and hyd in Syntrophobacter ssp. and Methanospirillum spp. as a diagnostic tool for monitoring anaerobic sludge deprived of molybdenum, tungsten and selenium. Environ Microbiol 2011, 13:1228-1235.
• [42]Thauer RK, Kaster A, Seedorf H, Buckel W, Hedderich R: Methanogenic archaea: ecologically relevant differences in energy conservation. Nature Rev 2008, 6:579-591.
• [43]Worm P, Müller N, Plugge CM, Stams AJM, Schink B: Syntrophy in methanogenic degradation. In (Endo)symbiotic Methanogenic Archaea. Edited by Hackstein JHP. Springer-Verlag, Berlin; 2010:143-173.
• [44]Ahring BK, Sandberg M, Angelidaki I: Volatile fatty acids as indicators of process imbalance in anaerobic digestors. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1995, 43:559-565.
• [45]Lindorfer H, Waltenberger R, Kollner K, Braun R, Kirchmayr R: New data on temperature optimum and temperature changes in energy crop digesters. Bioresour Technol 2008, 99:7011-7019.
• [46]van Lier JB, Rintala J, San Martin JL, Lettinga G: Effect of short-term temperature increase on the performance of a mesophilic UASB reactor. Water Sci Technol 1990, 22:183-190.
• [47]Marchaim U, Krause C: Propionic to acetic acid ratios in overloaded anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 1993, 43:195-203.
• [48]Li J, Ban Q, Zhang L, Jha AK: Syntrophic propionate degradation in anaerobic digestion: a review. Int J Agric Biol 2012, 14:843-850.
• [49]Carballa M, Smits M, Etchebehere C, Boon N, Verstraete W: Correlations between molecular and operational parameters in continuous lab-scale anaerobic reactors. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2011, 89:303-314.
• [50]Levén L, Eriksson A, Schnürer A: Effect of process temperature on bacterial and archaeal communities in two methanogenic bioreactors treating organic household waste. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2007, 59:683-693.
• [51]Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P, Bengtsson J, Grime JP, Hector A, Hooper DU, Huston MA, Raffaelli D, Schmid B, et al.: Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 2001, 294:804-808.
• [52]McCann KS: The diversity-stability debate. Nature 2000, 405:228-233.
• [53]Wittebolle L, Marzorati M, Clement L, Balloi A, Daffonchio D, Heylen K, De Vos P, Verstraete W, Boon N: Initial community evenness favours functionality under selective stress. Nature 2009, 458:623-626.
• [54]De Vrieze J, Verstraete W, Boon N: Repeated pulse feeding induces functional stability in anaerobic digestion. Microbal Biotechnol 2013, 6:414-424.
• [55]Werner JJ, Garcia ML, Perkins SD, Yarasheski KE, Smith SR, Muegge B, Stadermann FJ, DeRito CM, Floss C, Madsen EL, et al.: Microbial community dynamics and stability during an ammonia-induced shift to syntrophic acetate oxidation. Appl Environ Microbiol 2014, 80:3375-3383.
• [56]Haruta S, Kondo M, Nakamura K, Aiba H, Ueno S, Ishii M, Igarashi Y: Microbial community changes during organic solid waste treatment analyzed by double gradient-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2002, 60:224-231.
• [57]Dearman B, Marschner P, Bentham RH: Methane production and microbial community structure in single-stage batch and sequential batch systems anaerobically co-digesting food waste and biosolids. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2006, 69:589-596.
• [58]Werner JJ, Knights D, Garcia ML, Scalfone NB, Smith S, Yarasheski K, Cummings TA, Beers AR, Knight R, Angenent LT: Bacterial community structures are unique and resilient in full-scale bioenergy systems. PNAS 2011, 108:4158-4163.
• [59]Ariesyady HD, Ito T, Yoshiguchi K, Okabe S: Phylogenetic and functional diversity of propionate-oxidizing bacteria in an anaerobic digester sludge. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2007, 75:673-683.
• [60]Li YF, Wei S, Yu Z: Feedstocks affect the diversity and distribution of propionate CoA-transferase genes (pct) in anaerobic digesters. Microb Ecol 2013, 66:351-362.
• [61]Westerholm M, Hansson M, Schnürer A: Improved biogas production from whole stillage by co-digestion with cattle manure. Bioresour Technol 2012, 114:314-319.
• [62]Vahlberg C, Nordell E, Wiberg L, Schnürer A (2013) Method for correction of VFA loss in determination of dry matter in biomass. In: Method for correction of VFA loss in determination of dry matter in biomass. SGC report. © Svenskt Gastekniskt Center AB, p 273
• [63]Eaton AD, Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE: Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 19th edition. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC; 1995.
• [64]Maeda H, Fujimoto C, Haruki Y, Maeda T, Kokeguchi S, Petelin M, Arai H, Tanimoto I, Nishimura F, Takashiba S: Quantitative real-time PCR using TaqMan and SYBR green for Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, tetQ gene and total bacteria. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2003, 39:81-86.
• [65]Steinberg LM, Regan JM: Phylogenetic comparison of the methanogenic communities from an acidic, oligotrophic fen and an anaerobic digester treating municipal wastewater sludge. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008, 74:6663-6671.
• [66]Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Mentjies P, Drummond A: Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 2012, 28:1647-1649.
• [67]Boone D, Whitman W, Rouviére P: Diversity and taxonomy of methanogens. In Methanogenesis. Edited by Ferry JG. Chapman & Hall, New York; 1993:35-80.
• [68]Guindon S, Gascuel O: A simple, fast and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 2003, 52:696-704.
• [69]Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma KI, Miyata T: MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 2002, 30:3059-3066.
• [70]Xu K, Liu H, Du G, Chen J: Real-time PCR assays targeting formyltetrahydrofolate synthetase gene to enumerate acetogens in natural and engineered environments. Anaerobe 2009, 15:204-213.
• [71]Bok FAM, Stams AJM, Dijkema C, Boone DR: Pathway of propionate oxidation by a syntrophic culture of Smithella propionica and Methanospirillum hungatei. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001, 67:1800-1804.
• [72]Hales BA, Edwards C, Ritchie DA, Hall G, Pickup RW, Saunders JR: Isolation and identification of methanogenic-specific DNA from blanket bog peat by PCR amplification and sequence analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 1996, 62:668-675.