Diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasites in reptiles: comparison of two coprological methods

Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica

Denis Wolf³  Majda Globokar Vrhovec²  Klaus Failing¹  Christophe Rossier⁴  Carlos Hermosilla³  Nikola Pantchev² 

[1] Unit for Biomathematics and Data Processing, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen D-35392, Germany

[2] IDEXX Vet Med Lab, Ludwigsburg D-71636, Germany

[3] Institute of Parasitology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Schubertstraße 81, Giessen D-35392, Germany

[4] Institute of Animal Pathologie, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern CH-3012, Switzerland

关键词: Flotation;    Direct smear;    SAF-method;    Coproscopic diagnostic;    Parasites;    Reptiles;   

Others  :  1082574
DOI  :  10.1186/s13028-014-0044-4

 received in 2014-04-27, accepted in 2014-06-24,  发布年份 2014

【 摘 要 】

Background

Exotic reptiles have become increasingly common domestic pets worldwide and are well known to be carriers of different parasites including some with zoonotic potential. The need of accurate diagnosis of gastrointestinal endoparasite infections in domestic reptiles is therefore essential, not only for the well-being of captive reptiles but also for the owners. Here, two different approaches for the detection of parasite stages in reptile faeces were compared: a combination of native and iodine stained direct smears together with a flotation technique (CNF) versus the standard SAF-method.

Results

A total of 59 different reptile faeces (20 lizards, 22 snakes, 17 tortoises) were coprologically analyzed by the two methods for the presence of endoparasites. Analyzed reptile faecal samples contained a broad spectrum of parasites (total occurence 93.2%, n = 55) including different species of nematodes (55.9%, n = 33), trematodes (15.3%, n = 9), pentastomids (3.4%, n = 2) and protozoans (47.5%, n = 28). Associations between the performances of both methods to detect selected single parasite stages or groups of such were evaluated by Fisher's exact test and marginal homogeneity was tested by the McNemar test. In 88.1% of all examined samples (n = 52, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 77.1 - 95.1%) the two diagnostic methods rendered differing results, and the McNemar test for paired observations showed highly significant differences of the detection frequency (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

The combination of direct smears/flotation proved superior in the detection of flagellates trophozoites, coccidian oocysts and nematode eggs, especially those of oxyurids. SAF-technique was superior in detecting larval stages and trematode eggs, but this advantage failed to be statistically significant (P = 0.13). Therefore, CNF is the recommended method for routine faecal examination of captive reptiles while the SAF-technique is advisable as additional measure particularly for wild caught animals and individuals which are to be introduced into captive collections.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Wolf et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

【 参考文献 】

• [1][http://animal-public.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/ARPM2012_v131.pdf] webcite Arena PC, Steedman C, Warwick C: Amphibian and reptile pet markets in the EU: An investigation and Assessment. Animal public e.V, Düsseldorf. []
• [2]Karesh WB, Cook RA, Bennett EL, Newcomb J: Wildlife trade and global disease emergence. Emerg Infect Dis 2005, 11:1000-1002.
• [3]Tappe D, Meyer M, Oesterlein A, Jaye A, Frosch M, Schoen C: Transmission of Armilliferarmillatus ova at snake farm, The Gambia, West Africa. Emerg Infect Dis 2011, 2:251-254.
• [4]Pantchev N, Tappe D: Pentastomiasis and other parasitic zoonoses from reptiles and amphibians. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 2011, 124:528-535.
• [5]Tappe D, Büttner DW: Diagnosis of human visceral pentastomiasis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2009, 3:e320.
• [6]Foldenauer U, Pantchev N, Simova-Curd S, Martin Jurado O, Hatt JM: PentastomidenbefallbeiAbgottschlangen (Boa constrictor) – Diagnostik und endoskopischeParasitenentfernung. Tierarztl Pr K 2008, 36:443-449.
• [7]Beaver PC, Rolon FA: Proliferating larval cestode in man in Paraguay. A case report and review. Am J Tropical Med Hyg 1981, 30:625-637.
• [8]Chang KH, Chi JG, Cho SY, Han MH, Han DH, Han MC: Cerebralsparganosis: analysis of 34 cases with emphasis on CT features. Neuroradiol 1992, 34:1-8.
• [9]Gong C, Liao W, Chineah A, Wang X, Hou BL: Cerebral sparganosis in children: epidemiological, clinical and MR imaging characteristics. BMC Pediatr 2012, 12:155. BioMed Central Full Text
• [10]Hörchner F: Zur Parasitenfauna der Chameleontidae und Agamidae. Z f Parasitenkunde 1963, 22:537-544.
• [11]Kutzer E, Grünberg W: Parasitologie und Pathologie der Spulwurmkrankheit der Schlangen. Zentralblattfür Veterinärmedizin Reihe B 1965, 12(Suppl 2):155-175.
• [12]Mihalca AD, Gherman C, Ghira I, Cozma V: Helminth parasites of reptiles (Reptilia) in Romania. Parasitol Res 2007, 101:491-492.
• [13]Radhakrishnan S, Kurup SP, Banerjee PS: Endoparasitism in Captive Wild-Caught Snakes Indigenous to Kerala. India Zoo Biol 2009, 28:253-258.
• [14]Scullion FT, Scullion MG: Gastrointestinalprotozoal diseases in reptiles. J Exot Pet Med 2009, 18:266-278.
• [15]Papini R, Manetti C, Mancianti F: Coprological survey in pet reptiles in Italy. Vet Rec 2011, 169:207.
• [16]Rataj AV, Lindtner-Knific R, Vlahović K, Mavri U, Dovč A: Parasites in pet reptiles. Acta Vet Scand 2011, 53:33. BioMed Central Full Text
• [17]Hedley J, Eatwell K, Shaw DJ: Gastrointestinal parasitic burdens in UK tortoises: a survey of tortoise owners and potential risk factors. Vet Rec 2013, 173:525.
• [18]Greiner EC, Mader DR: Parasitology. In Reptile Medicine and Surgery. 2nd edition. Edited by Mader DR. Saunders Elsevier, St.Louis; 2006:343-364.
• [19]Barnard SM, Upton SJ: Laboratory Procedures for the Herpetoculturist. In A Veterinary Guide to the Parasites of Reptiles. Krieger Publishing, Malabar; 1994:81-98.
• [20]Pasmans F, Blahak S, Martel A, Pantchev N: Introducing reptiles into a captive collection: the role of the veterinarian. Vet J 2008, 175:53-68.
• [21]Zajac AM, Conboy GA: Fecal Examination for the Diagnosis of Parasitism. In Veterinary Clinical Parasitology. 8th edition. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester; 2012:3-164.
• [22]Bauer C: Untersuchungsmethoden. In Veterinärmedizinische Parasitologie. 6th edition. Edited by Schnieder T. Paul Parey, Berlin; 2006:84-104.
• [23]Sapero JJ, Lawles DK: The MIF stain-preservation technic for the identification of intestinal protozoa. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1953, 2:613-619.
• [24]Yang J, Scholten T: A fixative for intestinal parasites permitting the use of concentration and permanent staining procedures. Am J Clin Pathol 1977, 67:300-304.
• [25]Pantchev N: Parasitosen bei Reptilien. In Praktische Parasitologie bei Heimtieren. 2nd edition. Schlütersche, Hannover; 2012:238-341.
• [26]Cebra CK, Stang BV: Comparison of methods to detect gastrointestinal parasites in llamas and alpacas. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008, 232:733-741.
• [27]Faust EC, Sawitz W, Tobie J, Odom V, Peres C, Lincicome DR: Comparative efficiency of various technics for the diagnosis of protozoa and helminths in feces. J Parasitol 1938, 25:241-261.
• [28]Mank TG, Zaat JO, Blotkamp J, Polderman AM: Comparison of fresh versus sodium acetate acetic acid formalin preserved stool specimens for diagnosis of intestinal protozoal infections. Eur J ClinMicrobiol Infect Dis 1995, 14:1076-1081.
• [29]Shetty N, Prabhu T: Evaluation of faecal preservation and staining methods in the diagnosis of acute amoebiasis and giardiasis. J Clin Pathol 1988, 41:694-699.
• [30]Rinaldi L, Mihalca AD, Cirillo R, Maurelli MP, Montesano M, Capasso M, Cringoli G: FLOTAC can detect parasitic and pseudoparasitic elements in reptiles. Exp Parasitol 2012, 130:282-284.
• [31]Moré G, Pantchev N, Herrmann DC, GlobokarVrhovec M, Ofner S, Conraths FJ, Schares G: Molecular identification of Sarcocystis spp. helped to define the origin of green pythons (Morelia viridis) confiscated in Germany. Parasitology 2013, 5:1-6.
• [32]Offner S, Baur M, Blahak S, Friz T, Türbl T, Pantchev N, Hofmann RW: Possibilities to differentiate wild born from captive bred reptiles. In Proceedings International Conference on Reptile and Amphibian Medicine: 13–15 May 2012; Cremona Edited by Biron K, Bedin M, Blahak S, Kempf H, Knotek Z, Nardini S, Schilliger L, Selleri P. 2012, 94-96.
• [33]Mehlhorn H, Düwel D, Raether W: Untersuchungsmethoden. In Diagnose und Therapie der Parasitosen von Haus- Nutz- und Heimtieren. 2nd edition. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart Jena New York; 1993:1-21.
• [34]Ackermann H: BiAS für Windows, Biometrische Analyse von Stichproben, Version 9.08. Epsilon-Verlag, Hochheim Darmstadt; 2010.
• [35]Pantchev N, Nedorost N, Alexandrow N, Altherr B, Globokar Vrhovec M, Grum C, Richter B: Molekulare Differenzierung von Flagellaten (ein vom Ingo-und-Waltraud-Pauler-Fonds der AG ARK unterstütztes Projekt) und erste praktische Umsetzung mit Schwerpunkt auf Echsen und Schlangen. In Tagungsband der 39. Arbeitstagung der AG ARK (AG der DGHT), Fortbildungsveranstaltung für Tierärzte: 13–14 April 2013. Edited by Offner S, Weinzierl F. AGARK/DGHT, Deutsche Nationalbibliothek, Hamburg; 2013:51-66.
• [36]Pietrzak-Johnston SM, Bishop H, Wahlquist S, Moura H, Da Silva ND, Da Silva SP, Nguyen-Dinh P: Evaluation of commercially available preservatives for laboratory detection of helminths and protozoa in human fecal specimens. J Clin Microbiol 2000, 38:1959-1964.
• [37]Marti H, Escher E: SAF–an alternative fixation solution for parasitological stool specimens. Schweiz med Wschr 1990, 120:1473-1476.
• [38]Libman MD, Gyorkos TW, Kokoskin E, Maclean JD: Detection of pathogenic protozoa in the diagnostic laboratory: result reproducibility, specimen pooling, and competency assessment. J ClinMicrobiol 2008, 46:2200-2205.
• [39]Bogoch II, Raso G, N'Goran EK, Marti HP, Utzinger J: Differences in microscopic diagnosis of helminths and intestinal protozoa among diagnostic centres. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2006, 25:344-347.
• [40]Utzinger J, Botero-Kleiven S, Castelli F, Chiodini PL, Edwards H, Köhler N, Gulletta M, Lebbad M, Manser M, Matthys B, N'Goran EK, Tannich E, Vounatsou P, Marti H: Microscopic diagnosis of sodium acetate-acetic acid-formalin-fixed stool samples for helminths and intestinal protozoa: a comparison among European reference laboratories. ClinMicrobiol Infect 2009, 16:267-273.
• [41]Troll H, Marti H, Weiss N: Simple differential detection of Entamoebahistolytica and Entamoebadispar in fresh stool specimens by sodium acetate-acetic acid-formalin concentration and PCR. J Clin Microbiol 1997, 35:1701-1705.
• [42]Glinz D, Silué KD, Knopp S, Lohourignon LK, Yao KP, Steinmann P, Rinaldi L, Cringoli G, N'Goran EK, Utzinger J: Comparing diagnostic accuracy of Kato-Katz, Koga agar plate, ether-concentration, and FLOTAC for Schistosomamansoni and soil-transmitted helminths. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2010, 4:e754.
• [43]Enigk K: Resistance of the infectious forms of endoparasites of domestic animals. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 1979, 92:491-497.
• [44]Harnnoi T, Wijit A, Morakote N, Pipitgool V, Maleewong W: Specific gravity of Opisthorchisviverrini eggs. J Helminthol 1998, 72:359-361.
• [45]Adams AA: Establishing jurisdiction through forensic parasitology. J Parasitol 1993, 79:459-460.
• [46]Schmidt GD, Kuntz RE: Sphaerechinorhynchusserpenticola sp. n. (Acanthocephala: Sphaerechinorhynchinae), a parasite of the asian cobra, Najanaja (Cantor), in Borneo (Malaysia). J Parasitol 1966, 52:913-916.
• [47]Bolette DP: Sphaerechinorhynchusophiograndis n. sp. (Acanthocephala: Plagiorhynchidae: Sphaerechinorhynchinae), described from the intestine of a king cobra, Ophiophagushannah. J Parasitol 1997, 83:272-275.