Investigation into the animal species contents of popular wet pet foods

Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica

Kin-Chow Chang¹  Robert Atterbury¹  Isabella R Maine¹ 

[1]School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, Sutton Bonington Campus, University of Nottingham, ᅟ LE12 5RD, United Kingdom

关键词: DNA detection;    Animal proteins;    Ingredients;    food allergy;    Labelling;    Species authentication;    Pet food;   

Others  :  1147440
DOI  :  10.1186/s13028-015-0097-z

 received in 2014-08-09, accepted in 2015-01-20,  发布年份 2015

【 摘 要 】

Background

The use of the generic term “meat and animal derivatives” in declared ingredient lists of pet foods in the European Union is virtually universal. In the wake of the 2013 “horse meat scandal” in the human food chain, we examined the presence and authenticity of animal sources (cow, chicken, pig and horse) of proteins in a range of popular wet pet foods in the United Kingdom.

Findings

Seventeen leading dog and cat foods were sampled for the relative presence of DNA from each of the four animal species by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. No horse DNA was detected. However, there was detection at substantial levels of unspecified animal species in most products tested. In 14 out of 17 samples, bovine, porcine and chicken DNA were found in various proportions and combinations but were not explicitly identified on the product labels. Of the 7 products with prominent headline descriptions containing the term “with beef”, only 2 were found to contain more bovine DNA (>50%) than pig and chicken DNA combined.

Conclusions

There is a need for the pet food industry to show greater transparency to customers in the disclosure of the types of animal proteins (animal species and tissue types) in their products. Full disclosure of animal contents will (a) allow more informed choices to be made on purchases which are particularly important for pets with food allergies, (b) reduce the risk of product misinterpretation by shoppers, and (c) avoid potential religious concerns.

【 授权许可】

   
2015 Maine et al.; licensee BioMed Central.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Premanandh J. Horse meat scandal - a wake-up call for regulatory authorities. Food Control. 2013; 34:568-569.
• [2]European Pet Food Industry Federation (FEDIAF): Code of Good Labelling Practice for Pet Foods. Oct 2011; available online http://www.fediaf.org/self-regulation/labelling/.
• [3]Ricci R, Granato A, Vascellari M, Palagiano C, Andrighetto I, Diez M, Mutinelli F. Identification of undeclared sources of animal origin in canine dry foods used in dietary elimination trials. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2013; 97(S1):32-38.
• [4]The food labelling regulations 1996. In: http://www.food.gov.uk/sites/default/files/multimedia/pdfs/quid.pdf
• [5]Proverbio D, Perego R, Spada E, Ferro E. Prevalence of adverse food reactions in 130 dogs in Italy with dermatological signs: a retrospective study. J Small Anim Pract. 2010; 51:370-374.
• [6]Chesney CJ. Food sensitivity in the dog: a quantitative study. J Small Anim Pract. 2002;43:203–207.