Microalgal biomass production pathways: evaluation of life cycle environmental impacts

Biotechnology for Biofuels

Vikas Khanna¹  George G Zaimes¹ 

[1]Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, 15261, Pennsylvania

关键词: Water demands;    GHG emissions;    Open raceway ponds;    Chlorella vulgaris;    Life cycle analysis;    Biofuel;    Bioenergy;    Biomass;    Microalgae;   

Others  :  798014
DOI  :  10.1186/1754-6834-6-88

 received in 2013-03-11, accepted in 2013-06-13,  发布年份 2013

【 摘 要 】

Background

Microalgae are touted as an attractive alternative to traditional forms of biomass for biofuel production, due to high productivity, ability to be cultivated on marginal lands, and potential to utilize carbon dioxide (CO₂) from industrial flue gas. This work examines the fossil energy return on investment (EROI_fossil), greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and direct Water Demands (WD) of producing dried algal biomass through the cultivation of microalgae in Open Raceway Ponds (ORP) for 21 geographic locations in the contiguous United States (U.S.). For each location, comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) is performed for multiple microalgal biomass production pathways, consisting of a combination of cultivation and harvesting options.

Results

Results indicate that the EROI_fossil for microalgae biomass vary from 0.38 to 1.08 with life cycle GHG emissions of −46.2 to 48.9 (g CO₂ eq/MJ-biomass) and direct WDs of 20.8 to 38.8 (Liters/MJ-biomass) over the range of scenarios analyzed. Further anaylsis reveals that the EROI_fossil for production pathways is relatively location invariant, and that algae’s life cycle energy balance and GHG impacts are highly dependent on cultivation and harvesting parameters. Contrarily, algae’s direct water demands were found to be highly sensitive to geographic location, and thus may be a constraining factor in sustainable algal-derived biofuel production. Additionally, scenarios with promising EROI_fossil and GHG emissions profiles are plagued with high technological uncertainty.

Conclusions

Given the high variability in microalgae’s energy and environmental performance, careful evaluation of the algae-to-fuel supply chain is necessary to ensure the long-term sustainability of emerging algal biofuel systems. Alternative production scenarios and technologies may have the potential to reduce the critical demands of biomass production, and should be considered to make algae a viable and more efficient biofuel alternative.

【 授权许可】

   
2013 Zaimes and Khanna; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Sims REH, Mabee W, Saddler JN, Taylor M: An overview of second generation biofuel technologies. Bioresour Technol 2010, 101:1570-1580.
• [2]Greenwell H, Laurens L, Shields R, Lovitt R, Flynn K: Placing microalgae on the biofuels priority list: a review of the technological challenges. J R Soc Interface 2010, 7:703-726.
• [3]Wijffels RH, Barbosa MJ: An Outlook on Microalgal Biofuels. Science 2010, 329:796-799.
• [4]Chisti Y: Response to reijnders: do biofuels from microalgae beat biofuels from terrestrial plants? Trends Biotechnol 2008, 26:351-352.
• [5]Chisti Y: Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol Adv 2007, 25:13.
• [6]Dismukes GC, Carrieri D, Bennette N, Ananyev GM, Posewitz MC: Aquatic phototrophs: efficient alternatives to land-based crops for biofuels. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2008, 19:235-240.
• [7]Malcata FX: Microalgae and biofuels: a promising partnership? Trends Biotechnol 2011, 29:542-549.
• [8]Williams PJB, Laurens LML: Microalgae as biodiesel & biomass feedstocks: review & analysis of the biochemistry, energetics & economics. Energ Environ Sci 2010, 3:554-590.
• [9]Chisti Y: Biodiesel from microalgae beats bioethanol. Trends Biotechnol 2008, 26:126-131.
• [10]Sissine F: Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007: A Summary of Major Provisions; Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, Order Code RL34294. Washington, DC; 2007:22.
• [11]John S, et al.: A look back at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Aquatic Species Program [electronic resource] : biodiesel from algae. Golden, Colo: National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 1998.
• [12]Huntley M, Redalje D: CO2 Mitigation and renewable Oil from photosynthetic microbes: a New appraisal. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 2007, 12:573-608.
• [13]Brentner LB, Eckelman MJ, Zimmerman JB: Combinatorial life cycle assessment to inform process design of industrial production of algal biodiesel. Environ Sci Technol 2011, 45:7060-7067.
• [14]Brune DE, Lundquist TJ, Benemann JR: Microalgal Biomass for. Potential for Replacement of Fossil Fuels and Animal Feeds. ASCE: Greenhouse Gas Reductions; 2009.
• [15]Clarens AF, Nassau H, Resurreccion EP, White MA, Colosi LM: Environmental impacts of algae-derived biodiesel and bioelectricity for transportation. Environ Sci Technol 2011, 45:7554-7560.
• [16]Clarens AF, Resurreccion EP, White MA, Colosi LM: Environmental life cycle comparison of algae to other bioenergy feedstocks. Environ Sci Technol 2010, 44:1813-1819.
• [17]Collet P, Hélias A, Lardon L, Ras M, Goy R-A, Steyer J-P: Life-cycle assessment of microalgae culture coupled to biogas production. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:207-214.
• [18]Jorquera O, Kiperstok A, Sales EA, Embiruçu M, Ghirardi ML: Comparative energy life-cycle analyses of microalgal biomass production in open ponds and photobioreactors. Bioresour Technol 2010, 101:1406-1413.
• [19]Kadam KL: Microalgae production from power plant flue gas: Environmental implications on life cycle basis; NREL/TP-510-29417. National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 2001.
• [20]Murphy CF, Allen DT: Energy-water nexus for mass cultivation of algae. Environ Sci Technol 2011, 45:5861-5868.
• [21]Shirvani T, Yan X, Inderwildi OR, Edwards PP, King DA: Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas analysis for algae-derived biodiesel. Energ Environ Sci 2011, 4:3773-3778.
• [22]Soratana K, Landis AE: Evaluating industrial symbiosis and algae cultivation from a life cycle perspective. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:6892-6901.
• [23]Stephenson AL, Kazamia E, Dennis JS, Howe CJ, Scott SA, Smith AG: Life-cycle assessment of potential algal biodiesel production in the united kingdom: a comparison of raceways and Air-lift tubular bioreactors. Energy Fuel 2010, 24:4062-4077.
• [24]Vasudevan V, Stratton RW, Pearlson MN, Jersey GR, Beyene AG, Weissman JC, Rubino M, Hileman JI: Environmental performance of algal biofuel technology options. Environ Sci Technol 2012, 46:2451-2459.
• [25]Campbell PK, Beer T, Batten D: Life cycle assessment of biodiesel production from microalgae in ponds. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:50-56.
• [26]Xu L, Brilman DWF, Withag JAM, Brem G, Kersten S: Assessment of a dry and a wet route for the production of biofuels from microalgae: Energy balance analysis. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:5113-5122.
• [27]Yang J, Xu M, Zhang XZ, Hu QA, Sommerfeld M, Chen YS: Life-cycle analysis on biodiesel production from microalgae: water footprint and nutrients balance. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:159-165.
• [28]Li Y, Horsman M, Wu N, Lan CQ, Dubois-Calero N: Biofuels from microalgae. Biotechnol Prog 2008, 24:815-820.
• [29]Luo DX, Hu ZS, Choi DG, Thomas VM, Realff MJ, Chance RR: Life Cycle Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions for an Ethanol Production Process Based on Blue-Green Algae. Environ Sci Technol 2010, 44:8670-8677.
• [30]Batan L, Quinn J, Willson B, Bradley T: Net energy and greenhouse Gas emission evaluation of biodiesel derived from microalgae. Environ Sci Technol 2010, 44:7975-7980.
• [31]Khoo HH, Sharratt PN, Das P, Balasubramanian RK, Naraharisetti PK, Shaik S: Life cycle energy and CO(2) analysis of microalgae-to-biodiesel: preliminary results and comparisons. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:5800-5807.
• [32]Agusdinata DB, Zhao F, Ileleji K, DeLaurentis D: Life cycle assessment of potential biojet fuel production in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 2011, 45:9133-9143.
• [33]Chowdhury R, Viamajala S, Gerlach R: Reduction of environmental and energy footprint of microalgal biodiesel production through material and energy integration. Bioresour Technol 2012, 108:102-111.
• [34]Sander K, Murthy G: Life cycle analysis of algae biodiesel. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2010, 15:704-714.
• [35]Lardon L, Hélias A, Sialve B, Steyer J-P, Bernard O: Life-cycle assessment of biodiesel production from microalgae. Environ Sci Technol 2009, 43:6475-6481.
• [36]Schenk P, Thomas-Hall S, Stephens E, Marx U, Mussgnug J, Posten C, Kruse O, Hankamer B: Second generation biofuels: high-efficiency microalgae for biodiesel production. Bioenergy Research 2008, 1:20-43.
• [37]Ferreira AF, Marques AC, Batista AP, Marques PASS, Gouveia L, Silva CM: Biological hydrogen production by Anabaena sp. – Yield, energy and CO2 analysis including fermentative biomass recovery. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2012, 37:179-190.
• [38]Ferreira AF, Ortigueira J, Alves L, Gouveia L, Moura P, Silva CM: Energy requirement and CO2 emissions of bioH2 production from microalgal biomass. Biomass and Bioenergy 2013, 49:249-259.
• [39]Ferreira AF, Ribeiro LA, Batista AP, Marques PASS, Nobre BP, Palavra AMF, da Silva PP, Gouveia L, Silva C: A biorefinery from Nannochloropsis sp. microalga – Energy and CO2 emission and economic analyses. Bioresour Technol 2013, 138:235-244.
• [40]Xu L, Weathers PJ, Xiong XR, Liu CZ: Microalgal bioreactors: Challenges and opportunities. Eng Life Sci 2009, 9:178-189.
• [41]Benemann JR, Oswald PI: Systems and economic analysis of microalgae ponds for conversion of CO2 to biomass–Final report; DOE/PC/93204–T5. Pittsburgh Energy Technology Center: Department of Energy; 1996.
• [42]NREL: National solar radiation database (1961–1990). National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Ed. Golden, CO; 1994.
• [43]Harmelen T, Oonk H: Microalge biofixation process: applications and potential contributions to greenhouse gas mitigation options. Apeldoorn, The Netherlands: TNO Built Environment and Geosciences; 2006.
• [44]Uduman N, Qi Y, Danquah MK, Forde GM, Hoadley A: Dewatering of microalgal cultures: A major bottleneck to algae-based fuels. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2010, 2(1):012701-15.
• [45]Matos CT, Santos M, Nobre BP, Gouveia L: Nannochloropsis sp. biomass recovery by Electro-Coagulation for biodiesel and pigment production. Bioresour Technol 2013, 134:219-226.
• [46]Goldman JC: Outdoor algal mass-cultures.2. photosynthetic yield limitations. Water Res 1979, 13:119-136.
• [47]Weyer KM, Bush DR, Darzins A, Willson BD: Theoretical maximum algal Oil production. Bioenergy Research 2010, 3:204-213.
• [48]Becker EW: Micro-algae as a source of protein. Biotechnol Adv 25:207-210.
• [49]Power Profiler. http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/energy-and-you/how-clean.html webcite
• [50]Kadam KL: Environmental implications of power generation via coal-microalgae cofiring. Energy 2002, 27:905-922.
• [51]Mohn FH: Experiences and Strategies in the recovery of biomass from mass cultures of microalgae. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1980.
• [52]Ecoinvent Centre: Ecoinvent data v2.0. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Ed. Dubendorf; 2007.
• [53]Deru MP: NREL U.S. Life Cycle Inventory Database Roadmap; NREL Report No. BR-550-45153. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Dept. of Energy: Golden, CO; 2009:80401.
• [54]King CW, Webber ME: Water intensity of transportation. Environ Sci Technol 2008, 42:7866-7872.
• [55]Gerbens-Leenes PW, Hoekstra AY, van der Meer T: The water footprint of energy from biomass: a quantitative assessment and consequences of an increasing share of bio-energy in energy supply. Ecol Econ 2009, 68:1052-1060.
• [56]Dominguez-Faus R, Powers SE, Burken JG, Alvarez PJ: The water footprint of biofuels: a drink or drive issue? Environ Sci Technol 2009, 43:3005-3010.
• [57]Chiu Y-W, Walseth B, Suh S: Water embodied in bioethanol in the united states. Environ Sci Technol 2009, 43:2688-2692.
• [58]Gerbens-Leenes W, Hoekstra AY, van der Meer TH: The water footprint of bioenergy. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2009, 106:10219-10223.
• [59]Shuttleworth WJ: Putting the'vap'into evaporation. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions 2007, 11(1):210-244.
• [60]NOAA: Monthly Average Precipitation. National Climatic Data Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; 2006.
• [61]Weissman JC, Goebel R: Design and analysis of microalgal open pond systems for the purpose of producing fuels: a subcontract report. USA: Solar Energy Research Inst., Golden, CO; 1987.
• [62]Benemann JR: CO2 mitigation with microalgae systems. Energy Conv Manag 1997, 38:S475-S479.
• [63]Ho SH, Chen CY, Lee DJ, Chang JS: Perspectives on microalgal CO(2)-emission mitigation systems - A review. Biotechnol Adv 2011, 29:189-198.
• [64]Cho S, Lee D, Luong TT, Park S, Oh YK, Lee T: Effects of Carbon and Nitrogen Sources on Fatty Acid Contents and Composition in the Green Microalga, Chlorella sp 227. J Microbiol Biotechnol 2011, 21:1073-1080.
• [65]Lv JM, Cheng LH, Xu XH, Zhang L, Chen HL: Enhanced lipid production of Chlorella vulgaris by adjustment of cultivation conditions. Bioresour Technol 2010, 101:6797-6804.
• [66]Sukenik A, Shelef G: Algal autoflocculation—verification and proposed mechanism. Biotechnol Bioeng 1984, 26:142-147.
• [67]Bhave R, Kuritz T, Powell L, Adcock D: Membrane-based energy efficient dewatering of microalgae in biofuels production and recovery of value added Co-products. Environ Sci Technol 2012, 46:5599-5606.
• [68]Hanotu J, Bandulasena HCH, Zimmerman WB: Microflotation performance for algal separation. Biotechnol Bioeng 2012, 109:1663-1673.
• [69]Jensen KR, Allen RP, Keys D: Water Remediation and Biosolids Collection System and Associated Methods. Washington DC; 2012. US Patent 20,120,228,232
• [70]Mukhtar S, Wagner K, Gregory L: Field demonstration of the performance of a Geotube® dewatering system to reduce phosphorus and other substances from dairy lagoon effluent. Texas: Water Resources Institute; http://texaseden.org/disaster-resources/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/field-demo-geotube-dewatering-system-reduce-dairy-effluent.pdf 2009, 1:86145
• [71]Bhatnagar A, Chinnasamy S, Singh M, Das KC: Renewable biomass production by mixotrophic algae in the presence of various carbon sources and wastewaters. Appl Energy 2011, 88:3425-3431.
• [72]Rawat I, Kumar RR, Mutanda T, Bux F: Dual role of microalgae: phycoremediation of domestic wastewater and biomass production for sustainable biofuels production. Appl Energy 2011, 88:3411-3424.
• [73]Fortier M-OP, Sturm BS: Geographic Analysis of the Feasibility of Collocating Algal Biomass Production with Wastewater Treatment Plants. Environ Sci Technol 2012, 46:11426-11434.
• [74]Sialve B, Bernet N, Bernard O: Anaerobic digestion of microalgae as a necessary step to make microalgal biodiesel sustainable. Biotechnol Adv 2009, 27:409-416.
• [75]Hughes A, Kelly M, Black K, Stanley M: Biogas from macroalgae: is it time to revisit the idea? Biotechnology for Biofuels 2012, 5:86. BioMed Central Full Text