Impact of pretreatment and downstream processing technologies on economics and energy in cellulosic ethanol production

Biotechnology for Biofuels

Deepak Kumar¹  Ganti S Murthy¹ 

[1] Biological and Ecological Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, USA

关键词: process economics.;    process model;    pretreatment;    cellulosic ethanol;    Grass straw;   

Others  :  798430
DOI  :  10.1186/1754-6834-4-27

 received in 2011-06-04, accepted in 2011-09-05,  发布年份 2011

【 摘 要 】

Background

While advantages of biofuel have been widely reported, studies also highlight the challenges in large scale production of biofuel. Cost of ethanol and process energy use in cellulosic ethanol plants are dependent on technologies used for conversion of feedstock. Process modeling can aid in identifying techno-economic bottlenecks in a production process. A comprehensive techno-economic analysis was performed for conversion of cellulosic feedstock to ethanol using some of the common pretreatment technologies: dilute acid, dilute alkali, hot water and steam explosion. Detailed process models incorporating feedstock handling, pretreatment, simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation, ethanol recovery and downstream processing were developed using SuperPro Designer. Tall Fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb) was used as a model feedstock.

Results

Projected ethanol yields were 252.62, 255.80, 255.27 and 230.23 L/dry metric ton biomass for conversion process using dilute acid, dilute alkali, hot water and steam explosion pretreatment technologies respectively. Price of feedstock and cellulose enzymes were assumed as $50/metric ton and 0.517/kg broth (10% protein in broth, 600 FPU/g protein) respectively. Capital cost of ethanol plants processing 250,000 metric tons of feedstock/year was $1.92, $1.73, $1.72 and $1.70/L ethanol for process using dilute acid, dilute alkali, hot water and steam explosion pretreatment respectively. Ethanol production cost of $0.83, $0.88, $0.81 and $0.85/L ethanol was estimated for production process using dilute acid, dilute alkali, hot water and steam explosion pretreatment respectively. Water use in the production process using dilute acid, dilute alkali, hot water and steam explosion pretreatment was estimated 5.96, 6.07, 5.84 and 4.36 kg/L ethanol respectively.

Conclusions

Ethanol price and energy use were highly dependent on process conditions used in the ethanol production plant. Potential for significant ethanol cost reductions exist in increasing pentose fermentation efficiency and reducing biomass and enzyme costs. The results demonstrated the importance of addressing the tradeoffs in capital costs, pretreatment and downstream processing technologies.

【 授权许可】

   
2011 Kumar and Murthy; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 6.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

【 参考文献 】

• [1]Renewable Fuels Association (RFA) [http://www.ethanolrfa.org/pages/statistics] webcite
• [2]Taherzadeh MJ, Karimi K: Enzymatic-based hydrolysis processes for ethanol from lignocellulosic materials: A review. BioResources 2007, 2:707-738.
• [3]Sun Y, Cheng J: Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresource technology 2002, 83:1-11.
• [4]Teymouri F, Laureano-Pérez L, Alizadeh H, Dale BE: Ammonia fiber explosion treatment of corn stover. Applied biochemistry and biotechnology 2004, 115:951-963.
• [5]Alizadeh H, Teymouri F, Gilbert TI, Dale BE: Pretreatment of switchgrass by ammonia fiber explosion (AFEX). Applied biochemistry and biotechnology 2005, 124:1133-1141.
• [6]Bansal P, Hall M, Realff MJ, Lee JH, Bommarius AS: Modeling cellulase kinetics on lignocellulosic substrates. Biotechnology Advances 2009, 27:833-848.
• [7]Zheng Y, Pan Z, Zhang R, Jenkins BM: Kinetic modeling for enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated creeping wild ryegrass. Biotechnology and bioengineering 2009, 102:1558-1569.
• [8]Rawe BA: Breakthroughs and Challenges in the Production of Cellulosic Ethanol. MMG 445 Basic Biotechnology eJournal 2008, 4:10-15.
• [9]Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B, Elander R, Lee Y, Holtzapple M, Ladisch M: Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource technology 2005, 96:673-686.
• [10]da Costa Sousa L, Chundawat SPS, Balan V, Dale BE: Cradle-to-grave'assessment of existing lignocellulose pretreatment technologies. Current opinion in biotechnology 2009, 20:339-347.
• [11]Ballesteros M, Oliva J, Negro M, Manzanares P, Ballesteros I: Ethanol from lignocellulosic materials by a simultaneous saccharification and fermentation process (SFS) with Kluyveromyces marxianus CECT 10875. Process Biochemistry 2004, 39:1843-1848.
• [12]Bjerre AB, Olesen AB, Fernqvist T, Plöger A, Schmidt AS: Pretreatment of wheat straw using combined wet oxidation and alkaline hydrolysis resulting in convertible cellulose and hemicellulose. Biotechnology and bioengineering 1996, 49:568-577.
• [13]Laser M, Schulman D, Allen SG, Lichwa J, Antal MJ: A comparison of liquid hot water and steam pretreatments of sugar cane bagasse for bioconversion to ethanol. Bioresource technology 2002, 81:33-44.
• [14]Lloyd TA, Wyman CE: Combined sugar yields for dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment of corn stover followed by enzymatic hydrolysis of the remaining solids. Bioresource technology 2005, 96:1967-1977.
• [15]Mosier N, Hendrickson R, Ho N, Sedlak M, Ladisch MR: Optimization of pH controlled liquid hot water pretreatment of corn stover. Bioresource technology 2005, 96:1986-1993.
• [16]Sun Y, Cheng JJ: Dilute acid pretreatment of rye straw and bermudagrass for ethanol production. Bioresource technology 2005, 96:1599-1606.
• [17]Linde M, Galbe M, Zacchi G: Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of steam-pretreated barley straw at low enzyme loadings and low yeast concentration. Enzyme and microbial technology 2007, 40:1100-1107.
• [18]Kumar D, Murthy G: Pretreatments and Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Grass Straws for Ethanol Production in the Pacific Northwest US. Biological engineering 2011, 3:97-110.
• [19]Aden A, Ruth M, Ibsen K, Jechura J, Neeves K, Sheehan J, Wallace J, Montague L, Slayton A, Lukas J: Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing co-current dilute acid prehydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis for corn stover. NREL/TP-510-32438, Golden, Colorado. National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 2002.
• [20]Zhu Y, Lee Y, Elander RT: Optimization of dilute-acid pretreatment of corn stover using a high-solids percolation reactor. Applied biochemistry and biotechnology 2005, 124:1045-1054.
• [21]Wyman CE, Dale BE, Elander RT, Holtzapple M, Ladisch MR, Lee Y: Comparative sugar recovery data from laboratory scale application of leading pretreatment technologies to corn stover. Bioresource technology 2005, 96:2026-2032.
• [22]Xu J: Alkaline Pretreatment of Switchgrass for Ethanol Production. In PhD. North Carolina State University, Biological and Agricultural Engineering; 2011.
• [23]Kumar P, Barrett DM, Delwiche MJ, Stroeve P: Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2009, 48:3713-3729.
• [24]Brodeur G, Yau E, Badal K, Collier J, Ramachandran K, Subramanian R: Chemical and Physicochemical Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass: A Review. Enzyme research 2011., 2011
• [25]Keller FA, Hamilton JE, Nguyen QA: Microbial pretreatment of biomass. Applied biochemistry and biotechnology 2003, 105:27-41.
• [26]Tucker MP, Kim KH, Newman MM, Nguyen QA: Effects of temperature and moisture on dilute-acid steam explosion pretreatment of corn stover and cellulase enzyme digestibility. Applied biochemistry and biotechnology 2003, 105:165-177.
• [27]Nguyen QA, Tucker MP, Keller FA, Eddy FP: Two-stage dilute-acid pretreatment of softwoods. Applied biochemistry and biotechnology 2000, 84:561-576.
• [28]Chum HL, Johnson DK, Black SK, Overend RP: Pretreatment-catalyst effects and the combined severity parameter. Applied biochemistry and biotechnology 1990, 24:1-14.
• [29]Kazi FK, Fortman JA, Anex RP, Hsu DD, Aden A, Dutta A, Kothandaraman G: Techno-economic comparison of process technologies for biochemical ethanol production from corn stover. Fuel 2010, 89:S20-S28.
• [30]Laser M, Jin H, Jayawardhana K, Lynd LR: Coproduction of ethanol and power from switchgrass. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 2009, 3:195-218.
• [31]Eggeman T, Elander RT: Process and economic analysis of pretreatment technologies. Bioresource technology 2005, 96:2019-2025.
• [32]Gnansounou E, Dauriat A: Techno-economic analysis of lignocellulosic ethanol: A review. Bioresource technology 2010, 101:4980-4991.
• [33]Galbe M, Sassner P, Wingren A, Zacchi G: Process engineering economics of bioethanol production. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology 2007, 108:303-327.
• [34]McAloon A, Taylor F, Yee W, Ibsen K, Wooley R: Determining the cost of producing ethanol from corn starch and lignocellulosic feedstocks. NREL/TP-580-28893, Golden, Colorado. National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 2000.
• [35]Kwiatkowski JR, McAloon AJ, Taylor F, Johnston DB: Modeling the process and costs of fuel ethanol production by the corn dry-grind process. Industrial Crops and Products 2006, 23:288-296.
• [36]Ramírez EC, Johnston DB, McAloon AJ, Singh V: Enzymatic corn wet milling: engineering process and cost model. Biotechnology for Biofuels 2009, 2:2. BioMed Central Full Text
• [37]Wooley R, Ruth M, Sheehan J, Ibsen K, Majdeski H, Galvez A: Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing co-current dilute acid prehydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis current and futuristic scenarios. NREL/TP-580-2615, Golden, Colorado. National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 1999.
• [38]Banowetz GM, Boateng A, Steiner JJ, Griffith SM, Sethi V, El-Nashaar H: Assessment of straw biomass feedstock resources in the Pacific Northwest. Biomass and Bioenergy 2008, 32:629-634.
• [39]Steiner J, Griffith S, Mueller-Warrant G, Whittaker G, Banowetz G, Elliott L: Conservation practices in western Oregon perennial grass seed systems. I. Impacts of direct seeding and maximal residue management on production. Agronomy Journal 2006, 98:177-186.
• [40]Aaron AL: The Estimating Process. In The Engineer's cost handbook: tools for managing project costs. Edited by Westney RE. New York- Basel: Marcel Dekker; 1997:1-40.
• [41]Wyman CE, Dale BE, Elander RT, Holtzapple M, Ladisch MR, Lee Y: Coordinated development of leading biomass pretreatment technologies. Bioresource technology 2005, 96:1959-1966.
• [42]Hendriks A, Zeeman G: Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource technology 2009, 100:10-18.
• [43]Spatari S, Bagley DM, MacLean HL: Life cycle evaluation of emerging lignocellulosic ethanol conversion technologies. Bioresource technology 2010, 101:654-667.
• [44]Delgenes J, Moletta R, Navarro J: Effects of lignocellulose degradation products on ethanol fermentations of glucose and xylose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Zymomonas mobilis, Pichia stipitis, and Candida shehatae. Enzyme and microbial technology 1996, 19:220-225.
• [45]Lawford HG, Rousseau JD: Performance testing of Zymomonas mobilis metabolically engineered for cofermentation of glucose, xylose, and arabinose. Applied biochemistry and biotechnology 2002, 98:429-448.
• [46]Ballesteros I, Negro MJ, Oliva JM, Cabañas A, Manzanares P, Ballesteros M: Ethanol production from steam-explosion pretreated wheat straw. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 2006, 130:496-508.
• [47]Barta Z, Reczey K, Zacchi G: Techno-economic evaluation of stillage treatment with anaerobic digestion in a softwood-to-ethanol process. Biotechnology for Biofuels 2010, 3:1-11. BioMed Central Full Text
• [48]Equipment cost database [http://www.matche.com/EquipCost/index.htm] webcite
• [49]Mani S, Sokhansanj S, Tagore S, Turhollow A: Techno-economic analysis of using corn stover to supply heat and power to a corn ethanol plant-Part 2: Cost of heat and power generation systems. Biomass and Bioenergy 2010, 34:356-364.
• [50]Kadam KL, Rydholm EC, McMillan JD: Development and validation of a kinetic model for enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass. Biotechnology progress 2004, 20:698-705.
• [51]Novozymes [http:/ / www.bioenergy.novozymes.com/ cellulosic-ethanol/ novozymes-cellulosic-solutions/ ] webcite
• [52]Prasad SB: Biomass-fired steam power cogeneration system: a theoretical study. Energy conversion and management 1995, 36:65-77.
• [53]Sendich EN, Laser M, Kim S, Alizadeh H, Laureano-Perez L, Dale B, Lynd L: Recent process improvements for the ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX) process and resulting reductions in minimum ethanol selling price. Bioresource technology 2008, 99:8429-8435.
• [54]Wallace B: Cost Estimation for a Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Pioneer Plant. NREL Technical Memo. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 2003.
• [55]Wingren A, Galbe M, Zacchi G: Techno Economic Evaluation of Producing Ethanol from Softwood: Comparison of SSF and SHF and Identification of Bottlenecks. Biotechnology progress 2003, 19:1109-1117.
• [56]Wingren A, Söderström J, Galbe M, Zacchi G: Process Considerations and Economic Evaluation of Two Step Steam Pretreatment for Production of Fuel Ethanol from Softwood. Biotechnology progress 2004, 20:1421-1429.
• [57]Hamelinck CN, Hooijdonk G, Faaij APC: Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: techno-economic performance in short-, middle-and long-term. Biomass and Bioenergy 2005, 28:384-410.
• [58]Bertilsson M, Andersson J, Lidén G: Modeling simultaneous glucose and xylose uptake in Saccharomyces cerevisiae from kinetics and gene expression of sugar transporters. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering 2008, 31:369-377.
• [59]Chandrakant P, Bisaria V: Simultaneous bioconversion of glucose and xylose to ethanol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the presence of xylose isomerase. Applied microbiology and biotechnology 2000, 53:301-309.
• [60]Wang Z, Keshwani DR, Redding AP, Cheng JJ: Alkaline pretreatment of coastal bermudagrass for bioethanol production. ASABE Annual International Meeting; Rhode Island Convention Center Providence, Rhode Island 2008.
• [61]Lee JM, Shi J, Venditti RA, Jameel H: Autohydrolysis pretreatment of Coastal Bermuda grass for increased enzyme hydrolysis. Bioresource Technology 2009, 100:6434-6441.