期刊论文详细信息
Archives of Public Health
Factors associated with data quality in the routine health information system of Benin
Yolaine Glèlè Ahanhanzo1  Laurent T Ouedraogo2  Alphonse Kpozèhouen2  Yves Coppieters1  Michel Makoutodé3  Michèle Wilmet-Dramaix1 
[1] Center of research in Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Clinical Research, School of Public Health, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
[2] Epidemiology and Biostatistics Department, Public Health Regional Institute, University of Abomey-Calavi, Abomey-Calavi, Benin
[3] Environment and Health Department, Public Health Regional Institute, University of Abomey-Calavi, Abomey-Calavi, Benin
关键词: Health information systems;    Related factors;    Data quality;   
Others  :  1070612
DOI  :  10.1186/2049-3258-72-25
 received in 2014-01-16, accepted in 2014-05-09,  发布年份 2014
PDF
【 摘 要 】

Background

Routine health information systems (RHIS) are crucial to the acquisition of data for health sector planning. In developing countries, the insufficient quality of the data produced by these systems limits their usefulness in regards to decision-making. The aim of this study was to identify the factors associated with poor data quality in the RHIS in Benin.

Methods

This cross-sectional descriptive and analytical study included health workers who were responsible for data collection in public and private health centers. The technique and tools used were an interview with a self-administered questionnaire. The dependent variable was the quality of the data. The independent variables were socio-demographic and work-related characteristics, personal and work-related resources, and the perception of the technical factors. The quality of the data was assessed using the Lot Quality Assurance Sampling method. We used survival analysis with univariate proportional hazards (PH) Cox models to derive hazards ratios (HR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Focus group data were evaluated with a content analysis.

Results

A significant link was found between data quality and level of responsibility (p = 0.011), sector of employment (p = 0.007), RHIS training (p = 0.026), level of work engagement (p < 0.001), and the level of perceived self-efficacy (p = 0.03). The focus groups confirmed a positive relationship with organizational factors such as the availability of resources, supervision, and the perceived complexity of the technical factors.

Conclusion

This exploratory study identified several factors associated with the quality of the data in the RHIS in Benin. The results could provide strategic decision support in improving the system’s performance.

【 授权许可】

   
2014 Glèlè Ahanhanzo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files Size Format View
20141017163008861.pdf 365KB PDF download
Figure 2. 30KB Image download
Figure 1. 34KB Image download
【 图 表 】

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

【 参考文献 】
  • [1]Statistique Canada: Le cadre d’assurance de la qualité de Statistique Canada. Ottawa: Ministry Of Industry; 2002.
  • [2]RHINO Program: PRISM. [http://rhinonet.org/prism/ webcite]
  • [3]Boone D, Cloutier S, Lins S, Makulec A: Botswana’s Integration Data Quality Assurance into Standards operating procedures: Adaptation of the Routine Data Quality Assessment Tool. Chapel Hill: Measure Evaluation; 2013.
  • [4]Aqil A, Lippeveld T, Hozumi D: PRISM framework: a paradigm shift for designing, strengthening and evaluating routine health information systems. Health Policy Plan 2009, 24:217-228.
  • [5]Adeya G, Bigirimana A, Cavanaugh K, Miller Franco L: Rapid Assessment of the Health System in Benin, 2006. U.S. Agency for International Development, USAID; 2007.
  • [6]Health Systems S20/20: Health system assessment in Bénin. Bethesda: Abt Associates; 2012.
  • [7]Health Metrics Network: Rapport d’évaluation du Système National d’Information et de Gestion Sanitaires du Bénin. Genève: World Health Organisation; 2007.
  • [8]Jutand M, Salamon R: [Lot quality assurance sampling: methods and applications in public health]. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2000, 48:401-408.
  • [9]Lemeshow S, Taber S: Lot quality assurance sampling: single- and double-sampling plans. World Health Stat Q 1991, 44:115-132.
  • [10]Rhoda DA, Fernandez SA, Fitch DJ, Lemeshow S: LQAS: User Beware. Int J Epidemiol 2010, 39:60-68.
  • [11]Seppala P, Mauno S, Feldt T, Hakanen J, Kinnunen U, Tolvanen A, Schaufeli WB: The Construct Validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Multisample and Longitudinal Evidence. J Hapiness Stud 2009, 10:459-481.
  • [12]Schaufeli WB, Salanova M: Work engagement: an emerging psychological concept and its implications for organizations. In Research in social issues in management. 5th edition. Edited by Gilliland SW, Steiner DD, Skarlicki DP. Greenwich: Information Age Publishers; 2007.
  • [13]Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Salanova M: The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire. A cross –national study. Educ Psychol Meas 2006, 66:701-716.
  • [14]Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB: Tests manuels UWES: UWES-9 version française. [http://www.wilmarschaufeli.nl/publications/Schaufeli/Tests/UWES_F_9.pdf webcite]
  • [15]Hotchkiss DR, Aqil A, Lippeveld T, Mukooyo E: Evaluation of the Performance of Routine Information System Management (PRISM) framework: evidence from Uganda. BMC Health Serv Res 2010, 10:188. BioMed Central Full Text
  • [16]Aqil A, Lippeveld T: Improving Routine Health Information System for a better health management : Routine Health Information system Course participant guide. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina; 2011.
  • [17]Dumont A, Gueye M, Sow A, Diop I, Konate MK, Dambe P, Abrahamowicz M, Fournier P: [Using routine information system data to assess maternal and perinatal care services in Mali and Senegal (QUARITE trial)]. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2012, 60:489-496.
  • [18]Chaled MK, Bellali H, Alaya NB, Ali M, Mahmoudi B: Auditing the quality of immunization data in Tunisia. Asian Pac J Trop Dis 2013, 3:65-70.
  • [19]Grammatikopoulos IA, Koupidis SA, Moralis D, Sadrazamis A, Athinaiou D, Giouzepas I: Job motivation factors and performance incentives as efficient management tools: A study among mental health professionals. Archives of Hellenic Med 2013, 30:46-58.
  • [20]Gopalan SS, Mutasa R, Friedman J, Das A: Health sector demand-side financial incentives in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review on demand- and supply-side effects. Soc Sci Med 2013. In Press
  • [21]Fleming N: The bonus myth. New Sci 2011, 210:40-43.
  • [22]Ministry Of Health: Plan National de Développement Sanitaire (PNDS) 2009–2018. Cotonou: Ministry Of Health; 2009.
  • [23]Ministry Of Health: Evaluation de la qualité des données des formations sanitaires au Bénin. Cotonou: World Health Organization; 2013.
  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:25次 浏览次数:14次