SAW, TOPSIS, PROMETHEE Method as a Comparison Method in Measuring Procurement of Goods and Services Auction System

International Conference on Informatics, Engineering, Science and Technology

计算机科学;工业技术

Pangaribuan, P.^1 ; Beniyanto, A.^1

Program Studi Sistem Informasi, Fakultas Teknik Dan Ilmu Komputer, Universitas Komputer Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia^1

关键词: Comparison methods;    Multi criteria decision making;    PROMETHEE;    Promethee method;   

Others  :  https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/407/1/012045/pdf
DOI  :  10.1088/1757-899X/407/1/012045

来源: IOP

【 摘 要 】

In the procurement of goods and services POKJA conduct auctions and decide the results of the auction. The decision taken will assist POKJA to asses and deterMine the winner of procurement and goods and services auction. Decision making base on some criteria and complexity in the assessment of attribute and benefit. Multi - criteria decision making helps to find best alternative base on existing data. Aim of this paper is to compare three available multi - criteria decision making (MCDM) methods (SAW, TOPSIS and PROMETHEE) for the auction application. Multi-criteria decision making is needed to calculate the strength in each stage of the procurement selection process. Where multi-criteria decision making decision support system is used in seeing the strength and rank ranking of the winning candidate for goods and services procurement. The result of the research are Promethee method that is good in performance, stability, saw, and topsis. They are good in computation and transparency base on analysis rank, reference rank and review rank. The implication is to provide alternative to select the winner of goods and services auction.