A Study on Course Management System Implementation in Indonesian Higher Education Institutions

International Conference on Industrial and Systems Engineering 2017

Saputra, Y.A.^1 ; Singgih, M.L.^1 ; Latiffianti, E.^1 ; Suryani, E.^2 ; Mudjahidin^2

Department of Industrial Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Kampus ITS, Sukolilo-Surabaya

60111, Indonesia^1

Department of Information System, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Kampus ITS, Sukolilo-Surabaya

60111, Indonesia^2

关键词: Communication forums;    Course management systems;    Higher education;    Higher education institutions;    Learning methods;    Management tasks;    Success measurement;    Users' satisfactions;   

Others  :  https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/337/1/012059/pdf
DOI  :  10.1088/1757-899X/337/1/012059

来源: IOP

【 摘 要 】

Information technology development nowadays has brought new colors in the higher education learning process. In Indonesia, the current trend showed a higher use of CMS to support the existing conventional learning method in the classrooms. This paper attempts to understand the characteristics of CMS implementation based on a survey at several higher education institutions in Indonesia. There were 9 selected higher education institutions observed in this study. The objectives were to find out the CMS implementation in terms of: 1) the management of CMS implementation, 2) the evaluation, 3) originality of materials, platform, and feature; and 4) participation level. The result showed that the use of CMS in these institutions, in general, was to support the classroom conventional learning method by providing a repository of lecture notes and communication forum/media outside the classroom. The management task mostly was taken care by a specific unit. A Moodle (freeware) was found as a typical platform in use, and none of the institutions chose to use paid platform i.e. Blackboard. The accessibility of CMS used was kept closed for limited group of people due to high cost of material originality assurance. Observation also found that there was not much attempts in evaluating the success of CMS implementation in each institution, whereas the success measurement was limited to the users' satisfaction level. The majority of institutions claimed a good internal participation level (with lecturers and students as the main users), but in general we found that lecturer participation in most institutions were low or even very low.