Redesign of Transjakarta Bus Driver's Cabin

2nd International Manufacturing Engineering Conference; 3rd Asia-Pacific Conference on Manufacturing Systems

Safitri, Dian Mardi^1 ; Azmi, Nora^1 ; Singh, Gurbinder^1 ; Astuti, Pudji^1

Laboratory of Work System Design and Ergonomics, Industrial Engineering Department, Trisakti University, Jakarta, Indonesia^1

关键词: Anthropometric data;    Classification trees;    Design and manufactures;    Design improvements;    Generic approach;    Generic products;    House of Quality;    Rapid upper limb assessments;   

Others  :  https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/114/1/012086/pdf
DOI  :  10.1088/1757-899X/114/1/012086

来源: IOP

【 摘 要 】

Ergonomic risk at work stations with type Seated Work Control was one of the problems faced by Transjakarta bus driver. Currently "Trisakti" type bus, one type of bus that is used by Transjakarta in corridor 9, serving route Pinang Ranti - Pluit, gained many complaints from drivers. From the results of Nordic Body Map questionnaires given to 30 drivers, it was known that drivers feel pain in the neck, arms, hips, and buttocks. Allegedly this was due to the seat position and the button/panel bus has a considerable distance range (1 meter) to be achieved by drivers. In addition, preliminary results of the questionnaire using Workstation Checklist identified their complaints about uncomfortable cushion, driver's seat backrest, and the exact position of the AC is above the driver head. To reduce the risk level of ergonomics, then did research to design the cabin by using a generic approach to designing products. The risk analysis driver posture before the design was done by using Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA), Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA), and Quick Exposure Checklist (QEC), while the calculation of the moment the body is done by using software Mannequin Pro V10.2. Furthermore, the design of generic products was done through the stages: need metric-matrix, house of quality, anthropometric data collection, classification tree concept, concept screening, scoring concept, design and manufacture of products in the form of two-dimensional. While the design after design risk analysis driver posture was done by using RULA, REBA, and calculation of moments body as well as the design visualized using software 3DMax. From the results of analysis before the draft design improvements cabin RULA obtained scores of 6, REBA 9, and the result amounted to 57.38% QEC and moment forces on the back is 247.3 LbF.inch and on the right hip is 72.9 LbF.in. While the results of the proposed improvements cabin design RULA obtained scores of 3, REBA 4, and the moment of force on the back is 90.3 LbF.in and on the right hip is 70.6 LbF.in. This indicated improvement cabin design can reduce ergonomic risk with lower scores on several parts of the body.