Mathematizing Process of Junior High School Students to Improve Mathematics Literacy Refers PISA on RCP Learning

3rd International Conference on Mathematics, Science and Education 2016

数学;自然科学;教育

Wardono^1 ; Mariani, S.^1 ; Hendikawati, P.^1 ; Ikayani^1

Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia^1

关键词: Cognitive styles;    Junior high schools;    Mathematical problems;    Mathematics literacy;    Mixed method;   

Others  :  https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/824/1/012049/pdf
DOI  :  10.1088/1742-6596/824/1/012049

来源: IOP

【 摘 要 】

Mathematizing process (MP) is the process of modeling a phenomenon mathematically or establish the concept of a phenomenon. There are two mathematizing that is Mathematizing Horizontal (MH) and Mathematizing Vertical (MV). MH as events changes contextual problems into mathematical problems, while MV is the process of formulation of the problem into a variety of settlement mathematics by using some appropriate rules. Mathematics Literacy (ML) is the ability to formulate, implement and interpret mathematics in various contexts, including the capacity to perform reasoning mathematically and using the concepts, procedures, and facts to describe, explain or predict phenomena incident. If junior high school students are conditioned continuously to conduct mathematizing activities on RCP (RME-Card Problem) learning, it will be able to improve ML that refers PISA. The purpose of this research is to know the capability of the MP grade VIII on ML content shape and space with the matter of the cube and beams with RCP learning better than the scientific learning, upgrade MP grade VIII in the issue of the cube and beams with RCP learning better than the scientific learning in terms of cognitive styles reflective and impulsive the MP grade VIII with the approach of the RCP learning in terms of cognitive styles reflective and impulsive This research is the mixed methods model concurrent embedded. The population in this study, i.e., class VIII SMPN 1 Batang with sample two class. Data were taken with the observation, interviews, and tests and analyzed with a different test average of one party the right qualitative and descriptive. The results of this study demonstrate the capability of the MP student with RCP learning better than the scientific learning, upgrade MP with RCP learning better compare with scientific learning in term cognitive style of reflective and impulsive. The subject of the reflective group top, middle, and bottom can meet all the process of MH indicators are then the subject of the reflective upper and intermediate group can meet all the MV indicators but to lower groups can only fulfill some MV indicators. The subject is impulsive upper and middle group can meet all the MH indicators but to lower groups can only meet some MH indicator, then the subject is impulsive group can meet all the MV indicators but for middle and the bottom group can only fulfill some MV indicators.