Automatic image registration performance for two different CBCT systems; variation with imaging dose

17th International Conference on the Use of Computers in Radiation Therapy

物理学;计算机科学

Barber, J.^1,3 ; Sykes, J.R.^2 ; Holloway, L.^3 ; Thwaites, D.I.^3

Nepean Cancer Care Centre, Penrith, NSW, Australia^1

St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, United Kingdom^2

Institute of Medical Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia^3

关键词: Automatic image registration;    Automatic image registration algorithms;    Correlation ratio;    Prostate volume;    Registration error;    Registration performance;    Residual error;    Target registration errors;   

Others  :  https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/489/1/012070/pdf
DOI  :  10.1088/1742-6596/489/1/012070

学科分类：计算机科学（综合）

来源: IOP

【 摘 要 】

The performance of an automatic image registration algorithm was compared on image sets collected with two commercial CBCT systems, and the relationship with imaging dose was explored. CBCT images of a CIRS Virtually Human Male Pelvis phantom (VHMP) were collected on Varian TrueBeam/OBI and Elekta Synergy/XVI linear accelerators, across a range of mAs settings. Each CBCT image was registered 100 times, with random initial offsets introduced. Image registration was performed using the grey value correlation ratio algorithm in the Elekta XVI software, to a mask of the prostate volume with 5 mm expansion. Residual registration errors were calculated after correcting for the initial introduced phantom set-up error. Registration performance with the OBI images was similar to that of XVI. There was a clear dependence on imaging dose for the XVI images with residual errors increasing below 4mGy. It was not possible to acquire images with doses lower than ∼5mGy with the OBI system and no evidence of reduced performance was observed at this dose. Registration failures (maximum target registration error > 3.6 mm on the surface of a 30mm sphere) occurred in 5% to 9% of registrations except for the lowest dose XVI scan (31%). The uncertainty in automatic image registration with both OBI and XVI images was found to be adequate for clinical use within a normal range of acquisition settings.