The Discrepancy between The Programs and Disaster Management Policy in Klapanunggal District, Bogor, West Java

4th International Seminar on Ocean and Coastal Engineering, Environmental and Natural Disaster Management

地球科学;生态环境科学

Puspito Sari, D.A.^1 ; Listiyowati, I.^2 ; Nefianto, T.^3 ; Lasmono^3

Environmental Engineering Program Study, Faculty of Engineering and Computer Sciences, Universitas Bakrie, Indonesia^1

Bogor City Public Health Office, Bogor, Indonesia^2

Disaster Management for National Security Program Study, Faculty of Defense Management, Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia^3

关键词: Disaster management;    Food insecurity;    Food security;    Natural disasters;    Relief programs;    West javas;   

Others  :  https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/135/1/012011/pdf
DOI  :  10.1088/1755-1315/135/1/012011

学科分类：环境科学（综合）

来源: IOP

【 摘 要 】

Bogor regency consists of 40 districts, 23 are prone tonatural disasters. Klapanunggal district is listed in 10 districts declared as most vulnerable to natural disasters. Natural disasters could lead to loss of property and infrastructure damage and will affect the food security in the region. Food shortages is one example of the condition which causes food insecurity. The aim of this research is to analyze the government's food security strategy in anticipation of disaster with a case study of food insecurity in Klapanunggal district. The analysis suggested that; 1) FSVA is an appropriate program to identify food shortage areas, 2) Food Shortage Relief Program (Program Penanganan Daerah Rawan Pangan-PDRP) is the optimal efforts in reducing food shortages in the region, 3)The mismatch between FSVA indicators and Food Shortage Relief Program makes Klapanunggal district difficult in achievingfree status food-shortage. Based on the analysis, it is suggested that the implementation of Food Shortages Relief Program could be carried out based on the priority issues and implemented with integrated coordination and assistance among stakeholders. Such priority issues, integrated coordination and assistance are fully analyzed in this study.