Sustainability and vulnerability: Understanding the anomaly from disaster perspectives. Case study: Glagaharjo Village in Mount Merapi

3rd International Conference of Planning in the Era of Uncertainty

Depari, C.D.A.^1

Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Kampus II Fakultas Teknik, Jalan Babarsari No.44, Yogyakarta

55281, Indonesia^1

关键词: Consensus methods;    High exposures;    Human safety;    Likert scale;   

Others  :  https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/70/1/012035/pdf
DOI  :  10.1088/1755-1315/70/1/012035

来源: IOP

【 摘 要 】

In its concern for human safety, the Government's policy to relocate those living in disaster prone areas is twofold: it is perceptibly profound yet socially cataclysmic. This anomaly, created by the contradiction between the need for sustainability and the fact of vulnerability, could be found in the case of Mount Merapi. Communities living in the hazardous zone of Merapi, particularly those in Glagaharjo Village, are acknowledged for their persistent rejection of relocation programs despite their high exposure to the catastrophic impacts of eruptions. To mitigate the impacts, a safe and conducive dwelling place which considers the characteristics of these affected communities must be encouraged. This research adopts a consensus method towards responses obtained through a Likert scale-questionnaire and measured with a statistical program. Prior this process, theoretical reviews toward the concept of place attachment, place dependence and place identity was established in order to determine the research variables for the questionnaire.