IntroductionTumour mutational burden (TMB) is an important emerging biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). The stability of TMB values across distinct EBUS tumour regions is not well defined in advanced lung cancer patients.MethodsThis study included a whole-genome sequencing cohort (n=11, LxG cohort) and a targeted Oncomine TML panel cohort (n=10, SxD cohort), where paired primary and metastatic samples were obtained by endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA).ResultsThe LxG cohort displayed a strong correlation between the paired primary and metastatic sites, with a median TMB score of 7.70 ± 5.39 and 8.31 ± 5.88 respectively. Evaluation of the SxD cohort demonstrated greater inter-tumoural TMB heterogeneity, where Spearman correlation between the primary and metastatic sites fell short of significance. Whilst median TMB scores were not significantly different between the two sites, 3 out of 10 paired samples were discordant when using a TMB cut-off of 10 mutations per Mb. In addition, PD-L1 copy number and KRAS mutations were assessed, demonstrating the feasibility of performing multiple molecular tests relevant to ICI treatment using a single EBUS sample. We also observed good consistency in PD-L1 copy number and KRAS mutation, where cut-off estimates were consistent across the primary and metastatic sites.ConclusionsAssessment of TMB acquired by EBUS from multiple sites is highly feasible and has the potential to improve accuracy of TMB panels as a companion diagnostic test. We demonstrate similar TMB values across primary and metastatic sites, however 3 out of 10 samples displayed inter-tumoural heterogeneity that would alter clinical management.

ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to investigate the clinical characteristics and diagnostic and therapeutic methods of bladder metastasis after radical prostatectomy and to improve its diagnosis and treatment.MethodsThe clinical data of four patients with bladder metastasis after radical prostatectomy were retrospectively analyzed from January 2011 to December 2021. Three cases suffered from intermittent gross hematuria, and only one case was found to have an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value. Transurethral resection of bladder tumor was performed in four cases, in which one case also underwent resection of urethral mass. Three cases received endocrine therapy, one of which added intravesical instillation and radiation therapy. Another case received chemotherapy based on comprehensive treatment.ResultsAccording to the pathological and immunohistochemical results, three cases were acinar adenocarcinoma of the prostate with Gleason score of 9, and all cases were PSA positive and negative for cytokeratin 7 (CK7) and GATA binding protein 3 (GATA-3). One case was small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the prostate and was positive for chromogranin A (CGA), synaptophysin (SYN), and cluster of differentiation 56 (CD56). During the follow-up period of 4 to 13 months, one case was lost to follow-up and three cases were alive.ConclusionBladder metastasis after radical prostatectomy is rare, and pathology combined with immunohistochemistry is the gold standard for its diagnosis. Pathological type determines its treatment. Systemic treatment is essential, and local treatment is the most palliative means. Early diagnosis and treatment is significant for better prognosis.

ObjectiveFor elderly patients aged ≥75 with esophageal cancer, whether surgical treatment is safe and effective and whether it is feasible to use a relatively radical “no tube, no fasting” fast-track recovery protocol remain topics of debate. We conducted a retrospective analysis to shed light on these two questions.MethodsWe retrospectively collected the data of patients who underwent McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) combined with early oral feeding (EOF) on postoperative day 1 between April 2015 and December 2017 at Medical Group 1, Ward 1, Department of Thoracic Surgery of our hospital. Preoperative characteristics, postoperative complications, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, duration of anastomotic leakage (day), hospital stay, and survival were evaluated.ResultsTwenty-three elderly patients with esophageal cancer underwent surgery with EOF. No significant difference was observed in intraoperative measures. The incidence of postoperative complications was 34.8% (8/23). Two patients (8.7%) were terminated early during the analysis of the feasibility of EOF. For all 23 patients, the mean hospital stay was 11.4 (5-42) days, and the median survival was 51 months.ConclusionPatients aged ≥75 with resectable esophageal cancer can achieve long-term survival with active surgical treatment. Moreover, the “no tube, no fasting” fast-track recovery protocol is safe and feasible for elderly patients.

BackgroundAcute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous hematopoietic malignancy. Patient prognosis cannot be accurately assessed in National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk stratification subgroups based on the current criteria. This study aimed to develop a novel prognostic score model for the quantitative prediction of prognosis in AML.ResultsWe developed a prognostic risk scoring model of AML using differentially expressed genes to predict prognosis in patients with AML. Furthermore, we evaluated the effectiveness and clinical significance of this prognostic model in 4 AML cohorts and 905 patients with AML. A prognostic risk scoring model of AML containing eight prognosis-related genes was constructed using a multivariate Cox regression model. The model had a higher predictive value for the prognosis of AML in the training and validation sets. In addition, patients with lower scores had significantly better overall survival (OS) and even-free survival (EFS) than those with higher scores among patients with intermediate-risk AML according to the NCCN guidelines, indicating that the model could be used to further predict the prognosis of the intermediate-risk AML populations. Similarly, patients with high scores had remarkably poor OS and EFS in the normal-karyotype populations, indicating that the scoring model had an excellent predictive performance for patients with AML having normal karyotype.ConclusionsOur study provided an individualized prognostic risk score model that could predict the prognosis of patients with AML.