This article is available for purchase or by subscription. See below.
Abstract
|
We discuss the axioms for an –angulated
category, recently introduced by Geiss, Keller and Oppermann in [J. Reine Angew.
Math. 675 (2013) 101–120]. In particular, we introduce a higher “octahedral
axiom”, and show that it is equivalent to the mapping cone axiom for an
–angulated
category. For a triangulated category, the mapping cone axiom, our octahedral axiom
and the classical octahedral axiom are all equivalent.
|
PDF Access Denied
Warning:
We have not been able to recognize your IP address 47.88.87.18
as that of a subscriber to this journal.
Online access to the content of recent issues is by
subscription, or purchase of single articles.
Please contact your institution's librarian suggesting a subscription, for example by using our journal-recommendation form.
Or, visit our
subscription page
for instructions on purchasing a subscription.
You may also contact us at
contact@msp.org or by using our contact form.
Or, you may purchase this single article for USD 29.95:
Keywords
triangulated categories, $n$–angulated categories,
octahedral axiom
|
Mathematical Subject Classification 2010
Primary: 18E30
|
Publication
Received: 18 November 2012
Revised: 8 March 2013
Accepted: 12 March 2013
Published: 2 July 2013
|
|