|
|
Recent Issues |
Volume 17, 1 issue
Volume 16, 6 issues
Volume 16
Issue 6, 3073–3719
Issue 5, 2459–3071
Issue 4, 1827–2458
Issue 3, 1253–1825
Issue 2, 621–1251
Issue 1, 1–620
Volume 15, 6 issues
Volume 15
Issue 6, 3107–3729
Issue 5, 2479–3106
Issue 4, 1863–2477
Issue 3, 1239–1862
Issue 2, 623–1238
Issue 1, 1–622
Volume 14, 6 issues
Volume 14
Issue 6, 3141–3763
Issue 5, 2511–3139
Issue 4, 1881–2509
Issue 3, 1249–1879
Issue 2, 627–1247
Issue 1, 1–625
Volume 13, 6 issues
Volume 13
Issue 6, 3099–3731
Issue 5, 2471–3097
Issue 4, 1857–2469
Issue 3, 1243–1856
Issue 2, 625–1241
Issue 1, 1–624
Volume 12, 4 issues
Volume 12
Issue 4, 1901–2517
Issue 3, 1265–1899
Issue 2, 643–1263
Issue 1, 1–641
Volume 11, 5 issues
Volume 11
Issue 5, 2477–3084
Issue 4, 1861–2475
Issue 3, 1243–1860
Issue 2, 625–1242
Issue 1, 1–624
Volume 10, 4 issues
Volume 10
Issue 4, 1865–2468
Issue 3, 1245–1863
Issue 2, 627–1244
Issue 1, 1–625
Volume 9, 4 issues
Volume 9
Issue 4, 1885–2502
Issue 3, 1255–1883
Issue 2, 625–1254
Issue 1, 1–624
Volume 8, 4 issues
Volume 8
Issue 4, 1855–2414
Issue 3, 1223–1853
Issue 2, 615–1222
Issue 1, 1–613
Volume 7, 4 issues
Volume 7
Issue 4, 1633–2270
Issue 3, 1135–1632
Issue 2, 529–1134
Issue 1, 1–528
Volume 6, 5 issues
Volume 6
Issue 5, 2031–2518
Issue 4, 1519–2029
Issue 3, 1025–1517
Issue 2, 513–1024
Issue 1, 1–512
Volume 5, 4 issues
Volume 5
Issue 4, 1291–1732
Issue 3, 865–1290
Issue 2, 443–864
Issue 1, 1–442
Volume 4, 2 issues
Volume 4
Issue 2, 647–1272
Issue 1, 1–645
Volume 3, 2 issues
Volume 3
Issue 2, 623–1292
Issue 1, 1–622
Volume 2, 2 issues
Volume 2
Issue 2, 591–1204
Issue 1, 1–590
Volume 1, 2 issues
Volume 1
Issue 2, 627–790
Issue 1, 1–625
|
|
|
|
|
This article is available for purchase or by subscription. See below.
Abstract
|
In this article we study a partial ordering on knots in
where
if there is an epimorphism from the knot group of
onto the knot group
of which preserves
peripheral structure. If
is a –bridge knot
and , then it is
known that must
also be –bridge.
Furthermore, Ohtsuki, Riley and Sakuma give a construction which, for a given
–bridge knot
, produces infinitely
many –bridge
knots with
. After characterizing
all –bridge
knots with
or less distinct boundary slopes, we use this to prove that in any such pair,
is
either a torus knot or has 5 or more distinct boundary slopes. We also prove that
–bridge
knots with exactly 3 distinct boundary slopes are minimal with respect to the partial
ordering. This result provides some evidence for the conjecture that all pairs of
–bridge
knots with
arise from the Ohtsuki–Riley–Sakuma construction.
|
PDF Access Denied
Warning:
We have not been able to recognize your IP address 47.88.87.18
as that of a subscriber to this journal.
Online access to the content of recent issues is by
subscription, or purchase of single articles.
Please contact your institution's librarian suggesting a subscription, for example by using our journal-recommendation form.
Or, visit our
subscription page
for instructions on purchasing a subscription.
You may also contact us at
contact@msp.org or by using our contact form.
Or, you may purchase this single article for USD 29.95:
Keywords
knot, $2$–bridge, boundary slope, epimorphism
|
Mathematical Subject Classification 2000
Primary: 57M25
|
Publication
Received: 8 February 2010
Revised: 4 May 2010
Accepted: 10 May 2010
Published: 1 June 2010
|
|