|
|
Recent Issues |
Volume 17, 1 issue
Volume 16, 6 issues
Volume 16
Issue 6, 3073–3719
Issue 5, 2459–3071
Issue 4, 1827–2458
Issue 3, 1253–1825
Issue 2, 621–1251
Issue 1, 1–620
Volume 15, 6 issues
Volume 15
Issue 6, 3107–3729
Issue 5, 2479–3106
Issue 4, 1863–2477
Issue 3, 1239–1862
Issue 2, 623–1238
Issue 1, 1–622
Volume 14, 6 issues
Volume 14
Issue 6, 3141–3763
Issue 5, 2511–3139
Issue 4, 1881–2509
Issue 3, 1249–1879
Issue 2, 627–1247
Issue 1, 1–625
Volume 13, 6 issues
Volume 13
Issue 6, 3099–3731
Issue 5, 2471–3097
Issue 4, 1857–2469
Issue 3, 1243–1856
Issue 2, 625–1241
Issue 1, 1–624
Volume 12, 4 issues
Volume 12
Issue 4, 1901–2517
Issue 3, 1265–1899
Issue 2, 643–1263
Issue 1, 1–641
Volume 11, 5 issues
Volume 11
Issue 5, 2477–3084
Issue 4, 1861–2475
Issue 3, 1243–1860
Issue 2, 625–1242
Issue 1, 1–624
Volume 10, 4 issues
Volume 10
Issue 4, 1865–2468
Issue 3, 1245–1863
Issue 2, 627–1244
Issue 1, 1–625
Volume 9, 4 issues
Volume 9
Issue 4, 1885–2502
Issue 3, 1255–1883
Issue 2, 625–1254
Issue 1, 1–624
Volume 8, 4 issues
Volume 8
Issue 4, 1855–2414
Issue 3, 1223–1853
Issue 2, 615–1222
Issue 1, 1–613
Volume 7, 4 issues
Volume 7
Issue 4, 1633–2270
Issue 3, 1135–1632
Issue 2, 529–1134
Issue 1, 1–528
Volume 6, 5 issues
Volume 6
Issue 5, 2031–2518
Issue 4, 1519–2029
Issue 3, 1025–1517
Issue 2, 513–1024
Issue 1, 1–512
Volume 5, 4 issues
Volume 5
Issue 4, 1291–1732
Issue 3, 865–1290
Issue 2, 443–864
Issue 1, 1–442
Volume 4, 2 issues
Volume 4
Issue 2, 647–1272
Issue 1, 1–645
Volume 3, 2 issues
Volume 3
Issue 2, 623–1292
Issue 1, 1–622
Volume 2, 2 issues
Volume 2
Issue 2, 591–1204
Issue 1, 1–590
Volume 1, 2 issues
Volume 1
Issue 2, 627–790
Issue 1, 1–625
|
|
|
|
|
This article is available for purchase or by subscription. See below.
Abstract
|
Motivated by string topology and the arc operad, we introduce the notion of
quasi-operads and consider four (quasi)-operads which are different varieties of the
operad of cacti. These are cacti without local zeros (or spines) and cacti proper as
well as both varieties with fixed constant size one of the constituting loops. Using
the recognition principle of Fiedorowicz, we prove that spineless cacti are
equivalent as operads to the little discs operad. It turns out that in terms of
spineless cacti Cohen’s Gerstenhaber structure and Fiedorowicz’ braided
operad structure are given by the same explicit chains. We also prove that
spineless cacti and cacti are homotopy equivalent to their normalized versions as
quasi-operads by showing that both types of cacti are semi-direct products of the
quasi-operad of their normalized versions with a re-scaling operad based on
.
Furthermore, we introduce the notion of bi-crossed products of quasi-operads and
show that the cacti proper are a bi-crossed product of the operad of cacti
without spines and the operad based on the monoid given by the circle group
.
We also prove that this particular bi-crossed operad product is homotopy
equivalent to the semi-direct product of the spineless cacti with the group
. This
implies that cacti are equivalent to the framed little discs operad. These
results lead to new CW models for the little discs and the framed little discs
operad.
|
PDF Access Denied
Warning:
We have not been able to recognize your IP address 47.88.87.18
as that of a subscriber to this journal.
Online access to the content of recent issues is by
subscription, or purchase of single articles.
Please contact your institution's librarian suggesting a subscription, for example by using our journal-recommendation form.
Or, visit our
subscription page
for instructions on purchasing a subscription.
You may also contact us at
contact@msp.org or by using our contact form.
Or, you may purchase this single article for USD 29.95:
Keywords
cacti, (quasi-)operad, string topology, loop space,
bi-crossed product, (framed) little discs, quasi-fibration
|
Mathematical Subject Classification 2000
Primary: 55P48
Secondary: 55P35, 16S35
|
Publication
Received: 9 January 2004
Revised: 16 March 2005
Accepted: 30 March 2005
Published: 15 April 2005
|
|