Association Between Histological Type of Tumour Growth and Patient Survival in T2-T3 Lymph Node-Negative Rectal Cancer Treated with Sphincter-Preserving Total Mesorectal Excision Bartlomiej Szynglarewicz Rafal Matkowski Email author Agnieszka Halon Aleksandra Lacko Marcin Stepien Jozef Forgacz Marek Pudelko Jan Kornafel Article First Online: 15 September 2009 Received: 12 February 2009 Accepted: 01 September 2009 DOI :
10.1007/s12253-009-9207-4
Cite this article as: Szynglarewicz, B., Matkowski, R., Halon, A. et al. Pathol. Oncol. Res. (2010) 16: 201. doi:10.1007/s12253-009-9207-4
Abstract For rectal cancer patients without nodal metastases the identification of unfavourable factors can be helpful for the better selection for adjuvant therapy and multimodality treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of clinico-histological parameters on prognosis in node-negative rectal cancer patients. One hundred and thirty-nine consecutive node negative rectal cancer patients with complete five-year follow-up were studied prospectively. All of them underwent curative anterior resection with total mesorectal excision technique. Seventy-eight patients with tumour penetration beyond the bowel wall received neo-adjuvant short-course radiation (25 Gy) followed by surgery within 1 week and postoperative chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in six cycles or adjuvant radiochemotherapy: irradiation (50.4 Gy) combined with chemotherapy (as above). Cancer-specific survival was calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Variables significant in univariate analysis by log-rank test (P < 0.05) entered the Cox proportional hazard model. Survival was decreased for males, older patients (>60 years) with extraperitoneal, poorly differentiated cancers, tumours with mucinous histology and with the absence of lymphocytic infiltration but with the lack of statistical importance. Prognosis was significantly improved for patients with T2 tumours versus T3 (P < 0.01) and with cancers with expanding growth comparing to diffusely infiltrating ones (P < 0.01). In multivariate analysis these parameters significantly and independently influenced survival (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively). Diffusely infiltrating growth of tumour can reflect the more aggressive cancer behaviour and unfavourable course of disease despite the optimised local control. Apart from the extent of tumour penetration the type of invasive margin can be an additional parameter helpful for the optimal treatment planning and better patient selection for postoperative chemotherapy.
Keywords Anterior resection Invasive margin character Lymphocytic infiltration Rectal cancer Total mesorectal excision
References 1.
Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RDH (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery- the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69:613–616
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 2.
Dorudi S, Steele RJ, McArdle CS (2002) Surgery for colorectal cancer. Br Med Bull 64:101–118
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 3.
Cecil TD, Sexton R, Moran BJ, Heald RJ (2004) Total mesorectal excision results in low local recurrence rates in lymph node-positive rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1145–1149
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 4.
Colquhoun P, Wexner SD, Cohen A (2003) Adjuvant therapy is valuable in the treatment of rectal cancer despite total mesorectal excision. J Surg Oncol 83:133–139
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 5.
Merchant NB, Guillem JG, Paty PB et al (1999) T3N0 rectal cancer: results following sharp mesorectal excision and no adjuvant therapy. J Gastrointest Surg 3:642–647
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 6.
Price T, Pittman K, Patterson W et al (2008) Management and survival trends in colorectal cancer. Clin Oncol 20:626–630
CrossRef Google Scholar 7.
Jass JR, Love S, Northover JM (1987) A new prognostic classification for rectal cancer. Lancet 1:1303–1306
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 8.
Jass JR, O’Brien MJ, Riddel HR et al (2007) Recommendations for the reporting of surgically resected specimens of colorectal carcinoma. Virchows Arch 450:1–13
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 9.
Szynglarewicz B, Matkowski R, Forgacz J et al (2007) Clinical factors in prediction of prognosis after anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum. Oncol Rep 17:471–476
PubMed Google Scholar 10.
Katsumata D, Fukui H, Ono Y et al (2008) Depth of tumor invasion in locally advanced rectal cancer correlates with patient’s prognosis: the usefulness of elastic stain for its measurement. Surg Today 38:115–122
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 11.
Bori R, Sejben I, Svebis M et al (2009) Heterogeneity of pT3 colorectal carcinomas according to the depth of invasion. Pathol Oncol Res (in press). doi
10.1007/s12253-009-9149-x
12.
Miyoshi M, Ueno H, Hashiguchi Y et al (2006) Extent of mesorectal tumor invasion as a prognostic factor after curative surgery for T3 rectal cancer patients. Ann Surg 243:492–498
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 13.
Yoshida K, Yoshimatsu K, Otani T et al (2008) The depth of tumor invasion beyond the outer border of the muscularis propria as a prognostic factor for T3 rectal/rectosigmoid cancer. Anticancer Res 28:1773–1778
PubMed Google Scholar 14.
Szynglarewicz B, Matkowski R, Maciejczyk A et al (2008) Combined-modality therapy with sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision for locally advanced rectal cancer: patient’s age and long-term outcome. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 17:49–52
PubMed Google Scholar 15.
Compton CC (2003) Colorectal carcinoma: Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Molecular Features. Mod Pathol 16:376–388
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 16.
Nagtegaal I, Gaspar C, Marijnen C et al (2004) Morphological changes in tumour type after radiotherapy are accompanied by changes in gene expression profile but not in clinical behaviour. J Pathol 204:183–292
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 17.
Sternberg A, Mizrahi A, Amar M, Groisman G (2006) Detection of venous invasion in surgical specimens of colorectal carcinoma: the efficacy of various types of tissue blocks. J Clin Pathol 59:207–210
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 18.
Harrison JC, Dean PJ, el-Zeky F et al (1994) From Dukes to Jass: pathological prognostic indicators in rectal cancer. Hum Pathol 25:498–505
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 19.
Quirke P, Dixon MF, Clayden AD et al (1987) Prognostic significance of DNA aneuploidy and cell proliferation in rectal adenocarcinomas. J Pathol 151:285–291
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 20.
Scott NA, Rainwater LM, Wieand HS et al (1987) The relative prognostic value of flow cytometric DNA analysis and conventional clinicopathologic criteria in patients with operable rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 30:513–520
CrossRef Google Scholar 21.
Secco GB, Fardelli R, Campora E et al (1990) Prognostic value of Jass’ histological classification in left colon and rectal cancer: a multivariate analysis. Digestion 47:71–80
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 22.
Ueno H, Jones A, Jass JR, Talbot IC (2002) Clinicopathological significance of the “keloid-like” collagen and myxoid stroma in advanced rectal cancer. Histopathology 40:327–334
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 23.
Cianchi F, Messerini L, Palomba A et al (1997) Character of the invasive margin in colorectal cancer: does it improve prognostic information of Dukes staging? Dis Colon Rectum 40:1170–1175
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 24.
Jimenez-Anula J, Luque RJ, Gaforio JJ, Delgado M (2005) Prognostic value of invasive growth pattern in sporadic colorectal cancer. Cir Esp 77:337–342
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 25.
Shimomura T, Ishiguro S, Konishi H et al (2004) New indication for endoscopic treatment of colorectal carcinoma with submucosal invasion. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 19:48–55
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 26.
De Quay N, Cerottini JP, Albe X et al (1999) Prognosis in Dukes’ B colorectal carcinoma: the Jass classification revisited. Eur J Surg 65:588–592
Google Scholar 27.
Ilyas M, Novelli M, Wilkinson K et al (1997) Tumour recurrence is associated with Jass grouping but not with differences in E-cadherin expression in moderately differentiated Dukes’ B colorectal cancers. J Clin Pathol 50:218–222
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 28.
Gagliardi G, Stepniewska KA, Hershman MJ et al (1995) New grade-related prognostic variable for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 82:599–602
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 29.
Neoptolemos JP, Oates GD, Newbold KM et al (1995) Cyclin/proliferation cell nuclear antigen immunohistochemistry does not improve the prognostic power of Dukes’ or Jass’ classifications for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 82:184–187
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 30.
LiDestri G, Rinzivillo C, Vasquez E et al (2001) Evaluation of the prognostic accuracy of Astler-Coller’s and Jass’ classifications of colorectal cancer. Tumori 87:127–129
Google Scholar 31.
Fisher ER, Robinsky B, Sass R, Fisher B (1989) Relative prognostic value of the Dukes and the Jass systems in rectal cancer. Findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Projects (Protocol R-01). Dis Colon Rectum 32:944–949
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 32.
Deans GT, Heatley M, Anderson N et al (1994) Jass’ classification revisited. J Am Coll Surg 179:11–17
PubMed Google Scholar 33.
Dundas SA, Laing RW, O’Cathain A et al (1988) Feasibility of new prognostic classification for rectal cancer. J Clin Pathol 41:1273–1276
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar 34.
Jass JR, Ajioka Y, Allen JP et al (1996) Assessment of invasive growth pattern and lymphocytic infiltration in colorectal cancer. Histopathology 28:543–548
CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar © Arányi Lajos Foundation 2009
Authors and Affiliations Bartlomiej Szynglarewicz Rafal Matkowski Email author Agnieszka Halon Aleksandra Lacko Marcin Stepien Jozef Forgacz Marek Pudelko Jan Kornafel 1. 2nd Department of Surgical Oncology Lower Silesian Oncology Center Wroclaw Poland 2. Department of Oncology Wroclaw Medical University Wroclaw Poland 3. Department of Pathology Wroclaw Medical University Wroclaw Poland 4. Chair of Oncology, Lower Silesian Oncology Centre Wroclaw Medical University Wroclaw Poland