Chromosomal aberrations accumulate in polyploid cells of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) Gábor Méhes Email author Norbert Speich Magdolna Bollmann Reinhard Bollmann Article Received: 26 July 2004 Accepted: 03 August 2004 DOI :
10.1007/BF03033742
Cite this article as: Méhes, G., Speich, N., Bollmann, M. et al. Pathol. Oncol. Res. (2004) 10: 142. doi:10.1007/BF03033742
13
Citations
53
Downloads
Abstract Persistant infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) of the uterine cervix is related with cytological atypia (SIL), the oncogenic potential of which is unclear in a given time point of monitoring. HPVinduced genetic instability result in polyploidization as well as in low frequency random chromosome aberrations in squamous cells. In the present work we analyzed whether highly polyploid/aneuploid cells reflect genomic changes at the chromosomal level. 13 samples with the cytological diagnosis of HSIL were analyzed for HPV type and nuclear DNA content measured by laser scanning cytometry (LSC). Hyperdiploid cells with >5c and with >9c DNA content were further analyzed for numerical aberrations of the chromosomes 3 and 17 by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) following repositioning. Cells with >5c DNA content were found more frequently than cells with >9c DNA content (5–98 and 1–44 cells, respectively). The FISH analysis demonstrated frequent polysomies, however, the rate of aneusomy (other than 2, 4, 8 or 16 chromosome copies) was significantly higher in cells with >9c DNA content than in cells with >5c DNA content or the normal diploid cells. The imbalance of chromosome 3 and 17 copy number was also increased in cells with >9c DNA content. Moreover, in three out of the 13 analyzed HSIL samples, recurrent abnormal chromosome 3/17 ratio was demonstrated in a significant part of the cells, indicating a common origin of these cells. Highly polyploid/aneuploid cells in HSIL accumulate cytogenetic aberrations detectable by FISH analysis. These cells may reflect early changes with tumorigenic potential in a very concentrated fashion.
Keywords HPV aneuploidy chromosome cytology cervix
References 1.
Zur Hausen H : Human papillomaviruses in the pathogenesis of anogenital cancer. Virology 184: 9–13, 1991
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 2.
Ferenczy A, Franco E : Persistent human papillomavirus infection and cervical neoplasia. Lancet Oncol 3:11–167, 2002
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 3.
Bosch FX, Lorincz A, Munoz N, et al : The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. J Clin Pathol 55:244–265, 2002
PubMed Google Scholar 4.
Zielinsky GD, Snijders PJF, Rozendaal L, et al. HVP presence precedes abnormal cytology in women developing cervical cancer and signals false negative smears. Br J Cancer 85: 398–404, 2001
CrossRef Google Scholar 5.
The 1988 Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologic diagnoses. Acta Cytol 33: 567–72, 1989
6.
Solomon D, Davay D, Kurman R, et al : The Bethesda 2001 Workshop: The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology of reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA 287: 2114–2119, 2002
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 7.
Böcking A, Chatelain R : Diagnostic and prognostic value of DNA cytometry in gynaecologic cytology. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 11: 177–186, 1989
PubMed Google Scholar 8.
Hanselaar AG, Vooijs GP, Mayall BH, et al : DNA changes in progressive cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Anal Cell Pathol 4: 315–324, 1992
PubMed Google Scholar 9.
Winkler B, Crum CP, Fujii T, et al : Koilicytic lesions of the cervix: the relationship of mitotic abnormalities to the presence of papillomavirus antigens and nuclear DNA-content. Cancer 53: 1081–1087, 1984
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 10.
Bibbo M, Dytch HE, Alenghat E, et al : DNA ploidy profiles as indicators in CIN lesions. Am J Clin Pathol 92: 261–265, 1989
PubMed Google Scholar 11.
Bollmann R, Bollmann M, Henson DE, Bodo M : DNA-cytometry confirms the utility of the Bethesda System for the classification of Papanicolaou smears. Cancer 93: 222–228, 2001
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 12.
Bollmann R, Mehes G, Torka R, et al : HPV typing and DNA ploidy determination in squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) in liquid fixed cytological samples. Cancer 99: 57–62, 2003
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 13.
Bollmann R, Mehes G, Torka R, et al : Determination of features indicating progression in ASCUS: HPV typing and DNA ploidy analysis from liquid based cytological samples. Cancer 99: 113–117, 2003
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 14.
Tarnok A, Gerstner AO : Clinical applications of laser scanning cytometry. Cytometry 50: 133–143, 2002
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 15.
Hanselaar AG, Böcking A, Gundlach H, et al : International Consensus Conference on the Fight Against Cervical Cancer IAC Task Force 8 Summary, Chicago, Illinois, USA: Summary statement on quantitative cytochemistry (DNA and molecular biology): Task Force 8. Acta Cytol 45: 499–501, 2001
PubMed Google Scholar 16.
Feoli-Fonseca JC, Oligny LL, Filion M, et al : Two-tier polymerase chain reaction direct sequencing method for detecting an typing human papillomaviruses in pathological specimens. Diagn Mol Pathol 7: 317–323, 1998
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 17.
Jacobs MV, Snijders PJ, van den Brule JC, et al : A general Primer GP5+/GP6+-Mediated PCR-Enzyme Immunoassay Method for Rapid Detection of 14 High-Risk and 6 Low-Risk Human Papillomavirus Genotypes in Cervical Scrapings. J Clin Microbiol 35: 791–795, 1997
PubMed Google Scholar 18.
Bauer HM, Greer CE, Manos MM : Determination of genital HPV infection using consensus PCR. In: Herrington CS and McGee JO (ed.): Diagnostic molecular pathology: a practical approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992
Google Scholar 19.
Duensing S, Duensing A, Flores ER, et al : Centrosome abnormalities and genomic instability by episomal expression of human papillomavirus type 16 in raft cultures of human keratinocytes. J Virol 75: 7712–7716, 2001
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 20.
Skyldberg B, Fujioka K, Hellström AC, et al : Human papillomavirus infection, centrosome aberration and genetic stability in cervical lesions. Mod Pathol 14: 279–284, 2001
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 21.
Southern SA, Herrington CS : Differential cell cycle regulation by low — and high-risk human papillomaviruses in low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix. Cancer Res 58: 2941–2945, 1998
PubMed Google Scholar 22.
Giannoudis A, Evans MF, Southern SA, Herrington CS : Basal keratinocyte tetrasomy in low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions of the cervix is restricted to high and intermediate risk HPV infection but is not type-specific. Br J Cancer 82: 424–428, 2000
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 23.
Hopman AH, Voorter CE, Ramaekers FC : Detection of genomic changes in cancer by in situ hybridization. Mol Biol Rep 19: 31–44, 1994
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 24.
Bollmann R, Torka R, Schmitz J, et al : Determination of ploidy and steroid receptor status in breast cancer by laser scanning cytometry. Cytometry 50: 210–215, 2002
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 25.
Atkin NB, Baker MC, Fox MF : Chromosome changes in 43 carcinomas of the cervix uteri. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 44: 229–241, 1990
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 26.
Umayahara K, Numa F, Suehiro Y, et al : Comparative genomic hybridization detects genetic alterations during early stages of cervical cancer progression. Genes Chrom Cancer 33: 98–102, 2002
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 27.
Kirchhoff M, Rose H, Petersen BL, et al : Comparative genomic hybridization reveals a recurrent pattern of chromosomal aberrations in severe dysplasia/carcinoma in situ of the cervic and in advanced stage cervical carcinoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 24: 144–150, 1999
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 28.
Hidalgo A, Schewe C, Petersen S, et al : Human papillomavirus status and chromosomal imbalances in primary cervical carcinomas and tumour cell lines. Eur J Cancer 36: 542–548, 2000
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 29.
Brink AATP, Wiegant JCAG, Szuhai K, et al : Simultaneous mapping of human papillomavirus integration sites and molecular karyotyping in short term cultures of cervical carcinomas by using 49color combined binary ratio labeling fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 134: 145–150, 2002
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar 30.
Bulten J, Poddighe PJ, Robben JC, et al : Interphase cytogenetic analysis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Pathol 152: 495–503, 1998
PubMed Google Scholar 31.
Aubele M, Zitzelsberger H, Schenck U, et al : Distinct cytogenetic alterations in squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix revealed by laser-assisted microdissection and comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer 84: 375–379, 1998
PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar © Arányi Lajos Foundation 2004
Authors and Affiliations Gábor Méhes Email author Norbert Speich Magdolna Bollmann Reinhard Bollmann 1. Institute of Pathology Bonn-Duisdorf Germany 2. Department of Pathology University of Pécs Pécs Hungary 3. Institute of Molecular Pathology and Gene Diagnostics Bonn Germany