Distribution of natural radioactivity around mechanized and non-mechanized mining regions
- 24 Downloads
Abstract
This study was conducted to assess the radiological impacts of mining activities in mechanized and non-mechanized mining sites in order to build up database records for non-nuclear industries. Measurements of 226Ra, 226Th and 40K in 50 soil samples collected from these sites were carried out using gamma spectrometry system. The investigations showed that the highest concentrations of these radionuclides were 32, 37 and 648 Bq/kg, respectively . The average values in the mechanized region were 16 ± 7, 22 ± 9 and 366 ± 148 Bq/kg, respectively, while in non-mechanized region they were 9 ± 4, 12 ± 6 and 111 ± 68 Bq/kg, respectively. Spearman’s rank correlation test resulted in significant correlations (at 0.01 level) between 226Ra and 232Th (0.6) and 40K (0.8) in the mechanized region, while 232Th correlated with 40K (0.445) in the non-mechanized region. At 0.05 level, only 232Th is correlated with 40K in mechanized area (0.58). Between the two groups, only 40K in the mechanized area showed significant correlation to 232Th in the non-mechanized area (0.497) at 0.05 level. The 226Ra/232Th ratios were 0.88 ± 0.66 and 0.77 ± 0.23 in the two regions, while 226Ra/40K ratios were much lower than natural. This is attributed to weathering and metrological conditions rather than mining activity. Some radiological parameters were assessed displayed in general, significantly low values when compared with average global and recommended values. It can be concluded that both mechanized mining and non-mechanized mining do not significantly alter the levels of natural radioactive elements and do not give rise to a significant radiation exposure for the mining workers or population.
Keywords
Radioactivity Mechanized and non-mechanized mining Dose indices Environmental monitoringNotes
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Majmaah University for the financial support of this project.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
References
- Ademola AK, Bello AK, Adejumobi AC (2014) Determination of natural radioactivity and hazard in soil samples in and around gold mining area in Itagunmodi, south-western Nigeria. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 7(3):249–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Al-Geed AMMA, Sam AK (2000) Radiological evaluation of gold mining activities in Ariab (Eastern Sudan). Radiat Prot Dosimetry 88(4):335–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Anjos RM, Umisedob N, da Silva AAR, Estellitaa L, Rizzottoc M, Yoshimura EM, Velascoc H, Santos AMA (2010) Occupational exposure to radon and natural gamma radiation in the La Carolina, a former gold mine in San Luis Province, Argentina. J Environ Radioact 101(2):153–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bashier EH, Salih I, Sam AK (2012) Gis predictive mapping of terrestrial gamma radiation in the Northern State. Radiat Prot Dosim, Sudan. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncs022,151(3):500-10 Google Scholar
- Chandrasekaran A, Ravisankar R, Senthilkumar G, Thillaivelavan K, Dhinakaran B, Vijayagopal P, Venkatraman B (2014) Spatial distribution and lifetime cancer risk due to gamma radioactivity in Yelagiri Hills, Tamilnadu, India. Egypt J Basic Appl Sci 1(1):38–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Darko EO, Tetteh GK, Akaho EHK (2005) Occupational radiation exposure to norms in a gold mine. Radiat Prot Dosim 114(4):538–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Doyi OC, Oppon ET, Glover G, Gbeddy W Kokroko (2013) Assessment of occupational radiation exposure in underground artisanal gold mines in Tongo, Upper East Region of Ghana. J Environ Radioact 12:77–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Durand JF (2012) The impact of gold mining on the Witwatersrand on the rivers and karst system of Gauteng and North West Province, South Africa. J Afr Earth Sci 68:24–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ebaid YY, El-Tahwy MS, El-Lakany AA, Garcia SR, Brooks GH (2000) Environmental radioactivity measurements of Egyptian soils. J Radianalyt Nucl Chem 243(2):543–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gilmore G (2008) Practical gamma-ray spectrometry, 2nd edn. Wiley, WarrigtonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Idriss H, Salih I, Alaamer AS, Abdelgalil MY, Salih SA, Hasan AM, Ahamed MM (2014) Study of radon in soil gas, trace elements and climatic parameters around South Kordofan state, Sudan. Environ Earth Sci 72(2):335–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Idriss H, Salih I, Alaamer AS, Saleh A, Abdelgali MY (2016) Environmental-Impact Assessment of Natural Radioactivity around a Traditional Mining Area in Al-Ibedia, Sudan. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 70(4):783–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Idriss H, Salih I, Alaamer AS, AL-Rajhi MA, Osman A, Adreani TE et al (2018) Health risk profile for terrestrial radionuclides in soil around artisanal gold mining area at Alsopag, Sudan. Acta Geophys 66(4):673–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP (1990) Recommendations of the ICRP. ICRP Pub No. 60. Pergamon Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Jallad KN (2016) Radiation hazard indices and excess lifetime cancer risk in sand from the northern and eastern regions of Kuwait. Environ Earth Sci 75(2):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Leopold K, Michalik B, Wiegand J (2007) Availability of radium isotopes and heavy metals from scales and tailings of Polish hard coal mining. J Environ Radioact 94(3):137–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Odumo OB, Mustapha AO, Patel JP, Angeyo HK (2011) Radiological survey and assessment of associated activity concentration of the naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM) in the Migori artisanal gold mining belt of southern Nyanza, Kenya. Appl Radiat Isotop 69(6):912–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pappa FK, Tsabaris C, Ioannidou A, Patiris DL, Kaberi H, Pashalidis I, Vlastou R (2016) Radioactivity and metal concentrations in marine sediments associated with mining activities in Ierissos Gulf, North Aegean Sea, Greece. Appl Radiat Isot 116:22–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Saleh H, Shayeb MA (2014) Natural radioactivity distribution of southern part of Jordan (Ma′an) Soil. Ann Nucl Energy 65:184–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Salih I, Ali S, Eisa S, Idriss H (2014) Radiation exposure of workers in storage areas for building materials. J Taibah Univ Sci 8(4):394–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Servitzoglou NG, Stoulos S, Katsantonis D, Papageorgiou M, Siountas A (2018) Natural radioactivity studies of phosphate fertilizers applied on Greek farm soils used for wheat cultivation. Radiat Prot Dosim 181(3):190–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Singh J, Singh H, Singh S, Bajwa BS, Sonkawade RG (2009) Comparative study of natural radioactivity levels in soil samples from the Upper Siwaliks and Punjab, India using gamma-ray spectrometry. J Environ Radioact 100(1):94–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (1982) Ionizing radiation: Sources and biological effects. Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (1993) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation Report the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- UNSCEAR (1988) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic) (2000) Exposures from natural sources. Report to general assembly. Annex B, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- WHO (2015) World Health Organization report: world health statistics. Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- WHO (2016) Environmental and occupational health hazards associated with artisanal and small-scale gold mining. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- Winde F, Brugge D, Nidecker A, Ruegg U (2017) Uranium from Africa: an overview on past and current mining activities—Re-appraising associated risks and chances in a global context. J Afr Earth Sc 129:759–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar