liquid velocity (11.2 – 27.6 mm/s), wall heat flux (26 – 66 kW/m2), and the location of nucleation site (0 – 180° from the bottom of the heater). A thin film heater with a narrow heating strip proposed in this study generates boiling bubbles in a restricted region on a horizontal heater. Therefore, the quality of the visualization of the sliding bubbles improved significantly. Furthermore, an artificial cavity created on the heating strip could control the location of the nucleation cavity so that it improved the surface condition difference between the polyimide-based heater and the metal heater. The two synchronized high-speed cameras captured the behavior of the bubbles from two perpendicular measurement angles. The configurations of the bubbles were identified by an image processing method based on shadowgraphy from the two images, and the results of the image processing includes various boiling bubble parameters, such as the departure and lift-off of bubble, bubble volume transient, bubble velocity, bubble frequency, etc. In particular, the volume of the non-spherical bubble was calculated by a three-dimensional reconstruction method, which defines a specific cross-section configuration at each elevation using stereoscopic images. The two verification steps confirmed that the reconstruction method has allowable errors and the monoscopic visualization method has a limitation for deformed bubble measurement.Based on the experimental observations, the force balance analysis of the sliding bubble on the horizontal tube was performed. The previous force balance model for the sliding bubble on a horizontal plate was improved for sliding bubble on the horizontal tube by introducing additional forces and representing them in cylindrical coordinates. The circumferential force balance analysis estimated the local liquid velocity, not obtained in experiment. The radial force balance analysis estimated the local liquid velocity gradient and predicted the lift-off point of the sliding bubble. As a result, the dominant forces determining bubble behavior confirmed in this study are the surface tension, contact pressure force, buoyancy and added mass force. Meanwhile, the lift force, buoyancy and added mass force are dominant near the lift-off. Finally, the study based on the experimental observation and analysis results figured out the transients of the bubble behavior parameters. It could be the foundation of developing a prediction model of bubble behavior by simplifying and improving on several parameters.
【 预 览 】
附件列表
Files
Size
Format
View
Experimental Measurement and Force Balance Analysis of Sliding Vapor Bubble Behavior on a Horizontal Tube